Skip to main content
Log in

Critical Events in the Ethics of U.S. Corporation History

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The history of corporations in the United States (U.S.) is much older than the country, as it must be understood in the context of the history of peoples of Europe who eventually dominated the North American continent in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. These European settlers came, in part, to achieve economic prosperity for themselves and, in many cases, for early forerunners of the modern corporation. These business organizations had predecessors in Europe millennia earlier as ancient Romans had developed a functional and successful form of corporation for the purpose of conducting commerce in the Roman Empire. In the decades that followed the founding of the U.S. in 1776, corporations evolved from rare, small, closely controlled business organizations with a multitude of restrictions to very large, very powerful modern institutions that enjoy many of the legal rights of humans. With this evolution came ethical issues, as (1) the ethical distance was altered between corporate decision-makers and those affected by those decisions, and (2) many of the legal rights of individual humans were extended, through litigation, to corporations. This article explains the historical development of the U.S. corporation and identifies 20 Critical Events in the Ethics of Corporation History (CEECH). An understanding of these historical events may facilitate comprehension of many of the current ethical issues associated with a legal organizational form that profoundly affects business and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson R.: 2005, ‘Moral Distance: What Do We Owe to Unknown Strangers?’, Philosophical Forum 36(1):31-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aljalian, N.N.: 1999, ‘Fourteenth Amendment Personhood: Fact or Fiction?’, St. John’s Law Review 73(2), 1-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amar, A.R.: 1998, The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction (Yale University Press, New Haven).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, J.: 2004, The Corporation (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A.A.: 1964, ‘Economic Power and the Free Society’, in A. Hacker (ed.), The Corporation Takeover (Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, A.L.: 1937, Big Business: Its Growth and Its Place (Twentieth Century Fund, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierman, H.: 2010 ‘The 1929 Stock Market Crash’, EH.Net Encyclopedia, http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/Bierman.Crash, 2 April 2010.

  • Bravin, J.: 2009, ‘Sotomayor Issues Challenge to a Century of Corporate Law’, Wall Street Journal September 17, A19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunting, D.: 1986, The Rise of Large American Corporations, 1889-1919 (Garland Publishing, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Responsive Politics: 2010 ‘Top All-Time Donors’, Center for Responsive Politics Website, http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php, 12 March 2010.

  • Charnovitz, S.: 2010 ‘Addressing Environmental and Labor Issues in the World Trade Organization’, Progressive Policy Institute Website, http://www.ppionline.org, 4 February 2010.

  • Chatterjee, D.K.: 2003, ‘Moral Distance: Introduction’, The Monist 86(3), 327-332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Columbo, R.J.: 2008, ‘Ownership, Limited: Reconciling Traditional and Progressive Corporate Law via an Aristotelian Understanding of Ownership’, Journal of Corporation Law 34(1), 248-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, P., Brammer, S., and Millington, A.: 2004, ‘An Empirical Examination of Institutional Investor Preferences for Corporate Social Performance’, Journal of Business Ethics 52(1), 27-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craven, W. F.: 1997, The Virginia Company of London, 1606–1624 (Genealogical Publishing Company, Baltimore).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaware State Government Website: 2010, http://www.corp.delaware.gov/aboutagency.shtml, 12 March 2010.

  • Derber, C.: 1998, Corporation Nation (St. Martin’s Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engerman, S.L.: 1972, ‘Some Economic Issues Relating to Railroad Subsidies and the Evaluation of Land Grants’, The Journal of Economic History 32(2), 443-463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine September 13, 4–9.

  • Fritzche, D.J.: 1991, ‘A Model of Decision-Making Incorporating Ethical Values’, Journal of Business Ethics 10(11), 841-852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, L.: 1975, The Public Image of Big Business in America, 1880-1940 (John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gepken-Jager, E. and Van Solinge, G.: 2005, VOC 1602-2002: 400 Years of Company Law (Kluwer, Deventer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J.M., Harris, J.H., and Topaloglu, S.: 2003, ‘The Dynamics of Institutional and Individual Trading’, Journal of Finance 58(6), 2285-2230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, W. and Schoenfeldt, L.F.: 2001, ‘Resolving Ethical Dilemmas through International Human Resource Management: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective’, Human Resource Management Review 11, 55-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubbs, K.E.: 1998, ‘Profits and Prophets’, World Trade 11(3), 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, A.: 1964, ‘Corporate America’, in A. Hacker (ed.), The Corporation Takeover (Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, T.: 2002, Unequal Protection (Rodale, Kutztown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Internal Revenue Service: 2010, http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/00cosec3.pdf, 20 April 2010.

  • Iyer, A.A.: 2006, ‘The Missing Dynamic: Corporations, Individuals and Contracts’, Journal of Business Ethics 67(4), 393-406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, H.S. and Rassekh, F.: 2000, ‘Smith, Friedman, and Self-Interest in Ethical Society’, Business Ethics Quarterly 10(3), 659-674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamani, A.: 2010 ‘The Case Against Corporate Social Responsibility’, Wall Street Journal August 23, R1.

  • Kaysen, C.: 1996, ‘Introduction and Overview’, in C. Kaysen (ed.), The American Corporation Today (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T.A.: 1996, ‘The American Corporation as an Employer: Past, Present, and Future Possibilities’, in C. Kaysen (ed.), The American Corporation Today (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuschnik, B.: 2008, ‘The Sarbanes Oxley Act: “Big Brother is Watching You” or Adequate Measures of Corporate Governance’, Rutgers Business Law Journal 5(1), 64-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W.: 1998, ‘Law and Finance’, The Journal of Political Economy 106(6), 1113-1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, L.W.: 2001, Origins of the Bill of Rights (Yale University Press, New Haven).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liptak, A.: 2010, ‘Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit’, New York Times January 21, A1.

  • Manne, H. G.: 2008, ‘Milton Friedman Was Right’, Wall Street Journal November 24, A12.

  • Manning, R.C.: 1984, ‘Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Personhood’, Journal of Business Ethics, 3(1), 77-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, C.J.: 1990, ‘Personalizing the Impersonal: Corporations and the Bill of Rights’, Hastings Law Journal, 41(3), 577-667.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCraw, T.K.: 1988, ‘The Evolution of the Corporation in the United States’, in J.R. Meyer and J.M. Gustafson (eds.), The U.S, Business Corporation: An Institution in Transition (Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, Massachusetts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellema, G.: 2003, ‘Responsibility, Taint, and Ethical Distance in Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 47(2), 125-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micklethwait, J. and Wooldridge, A.: 2003, The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea (Random House, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P.: 1981, ‘The Rise (and Retreat) of a Market: English Joint Stock Shares in the Eighteenth Century’, The Journal of Economic History 41(3), 559-577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nace, T.: 2003, Gangs of America: the Rise of Corporate Power and the Disabling of Democracy (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Constitution Center: 2010, http://www.constitutioncenter.org/timeline/, 3 April 2010.

  • Nederman, C.U.: 1987, ‘Sovereignty, War, and the Corporation: Hegel on the Medieval Foundations of the Modern State’, The Journal of Politics 49(2), 500-520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmyer, R.K.: 2001, John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court (Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, R.N.: 1951, Business Organization and Combination (Prentice Hall, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, R.S.: 1990, ‘The Central Distinction in the Theory of Corporate Moral Personhood’, Journal of Business Ethics 9(6), 473-480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, N.: 1985, ‘Wine and Wealth in Ancient Italy’, The Journal of Roman Studies 75, 1-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reader, S.: 2003, ‘Distance, Relationship and Moral Obligation’, The Monist 86(3), 367-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J.O.: 1985, America’s Business (Hill and Wang, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, M.J.: 1996, ‘From Antitrust to Corporation Governance? The Corporation and the Law: 1959-1994’, in C. Kaysen (ed.), The American Corporation Today (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Royden, H.: 1989, ‘The Tenure of Office of the Quinquennales in the Roman Professional Collegia’, The American Journal of Philology 110(2), 303-315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, D.: 2005, ‘Corporate Codes of Conduct and the Value of Autonomy’, Journal of Business Ethics 59, 3-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.: 1910, The Wealth of Nations (Dent, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.D. and Dyer, D.: 1996, ‘The Rise and Transformation of the American Corporation’, in C. Kaysen (ed.), The American Corporation Today (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedlow, R.S.: 1991, The Rise of the American Business Corporation (Harwood Academic Publishers, Philadelphia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L.: 1996, ‘Almost Everywhere: Surging Inequality and Falling Real Wages’, in C. Kaysen (ed.), The American Corporation Today (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau: 1890, Report on Transportation Business in the United States at the Eleventh Census (U.S. Federal Government, Washington).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S.: 2002, Corporations and the Third Way (Hart Publishing, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willan, T.S.: 1956, The Early History of the Russia Company, 1553-1603 (Manchester University Press, Manchester).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C.A.: 1999, ‘The Securities and Exchange Commission and Corporate Social Transparency’, Harvard Law Review 112(6), 1197-1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zyglidopoulos, S.C. and Fleming, P.J.: 2008, ‘Ethical Distance in Corrupt Firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 78(2), 265-274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Douglas Beets.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beets, S.D. Critical Events in the Ethics of U.S. Corporation History. J Bus Ethics 102, 193–219 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0805-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0805-1

Keywords

Navigation