Abstract
This paper argues, mainly on thebasis of Rawls's savings principle,Wissenburg's restraint principle, Passmore'schains of love, and De-Shalit'stransgenerational communities, for a doubleinterpretation of sustainable development as aprinciple of intergenerational justice and afuture-oriented green ideal. This doubleinterpretation (1) embraces the restraintprinciple and the argument that no individualcan claim an unconditional right to destroyenvironmental goods as a baseline that couldjustify directive strategies for governmentintervention in non-sustainable lifestyles, and(2) suggests that people's concerns about thedeterioration of nature and the environmentarticulate future-oriented narratives ofself-identity that could fuel non-directivestrategies to develop further responsibilitiestowards nearby future generations. Sustainabledevelopment, thus, provides sound arguments torestrict people's freedom to follow their ownlifestyles, when these lifestyles transgressedthe baseline of the restraint principle.However, the individual freedom of choiceshould not be restricted for any furtherenvironmental considerations. Non-directivestrategies are thus to stimulate thedevelopment of such further responsibilitiestowards nearby future generations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arrler, F., “Ecological Utilisation Space-Operationalizing Sustainability,” Paper Presented at the SAP/ISEE Moral and Political Reasoning in Environmental Practice Conference (Oxford, 1999).
Barry, B., “Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice,” in A. Dobson (ed.), Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999), pp. 93-117.
Bauman, Z., Modernity and the Holocaust (Polity Press, Cambridge, 1989).
Beck, U., Gegengifte: Die Organisierte Unverantwortlichkeit (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1988).
Beckerman, W., “Sustainable Development and our Obligations to Future Generations,” in A. Dobson (ed.), Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999), pp. 71-92.
Calvino, I., If on a Winter's Night a Traveler (Harcourt Brace and Company, San Diego, 1981).
Coesèl, M., De NJN, een Gemeenschap van Individualisten: De Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse Jeugdbond voor Natuurstudie [The NJN, a Community of Individualists: The History of the Dutch Youth Organisation for Nature Study] (Opulus Press, Leiden, 1997).
De-Shalit, A., Why Posterity Matters. Environmental Politics and Future Generations (Routledge, London, 1995).
Dobson, A., Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998).
English, J., “Justice between Generations,” Philosophical Studies 31 (1977), pp. 91-104.
Gert, B., Morality: Its Nature and Justification (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998).
Giddens, A., The Consequences of Modernity (Polity Press, Cambridge, 1990).
Giddens, A., Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Polity Press, Cambridge, 1991).
Giddens, A., Beyond Left and Right. The Future of Radical Politics (Polity Press, Cambridge, 1994).
Golding, M. P., “Obligations to Future Generations,” The Monist 56 (1972), pp. 85-99.
Hardin, G., “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science 162 (1968), pp. 1243-1248.
Hickman, L. A., “Nature as Culture. John Dewey's Pragmatic Realism,” in A. Light and E. Katz (eds.), Environmental Pragmatism (Routledge, London, 1996), pp. 50-72.
Korthals,M., “Ethical Dilemmas in Sustainable Agriculture,” Food Ethics Review 1 (2000).
Light, A., “Environmental Pragmatism as Philosophy or Metaphilosophy? On the Weston-Katz Debate,” in A. Light and E. Katz (eds.), Environmental Pragmatism (Routledge, London, 1996), pp. 325-338.
Light, A., “Methodological Pragmatism for Bioethics-AModest Proposal,” in J. Keulartz, M. Korthals, M. Schermer and T. Swierstra (eds.), Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002), pp. 77-95.
Manning, R., “Environmental Ethics and Rawls' Theory of Justice,” Environmental Ethics 3 (1981), pp. 155-165.
Margadant-van Arcken, M. J. A., Dierenjuf: Natuureducatie en de Relatie tussen Jonge Kinderen en Dieren [Animal Teacher: Nature Education and the Relation between Young Children and Animals] (Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, 1988).
Norton, B. G., “The Constancy of Leopold's Land Ethics,” in A. Light and E. Katz (eds.), Environmental Pragmatism (Routledge, London, 1996a), pp. 84-102.
Norton. B. G., “Integration or Reduction. Two Approaches to Environmental Values,” in A. Light and E. Katz (eds.), Environmental Pragmatism (Routledge, London, 1996b), pp. 105-138.
Norton, B., “Ecology and Opportunity: Intergenerational Equity and Sustainable Options,” in A. Dobson (ed.), Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999), pp. 118-150.
O'Neill, J., Ecology, Policy and Politics. Human Well-Being and the Natural World (Routledge, London, 1993).
O'Riordan, T. and A. Jordan, “The Precautionary Principle in Contemporary Environmental Politics,” Environmental Values 4 (1995), pp. 191-212.
Ophuls, W., Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity (Freeman, San Francisco, CA, 1977).
Parfit, D., Reasons and Persons (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984).
Passmore, J., Man's Responsibility for Nature (Gresham Press, Old Woking, 1980).
Perrings, C., “Reserved Rationality and the Precautionary Principle: Technological Change, Time and Uncertainty in Environmental Decision Making,” in R. Costanza (ed.), Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability (Columbia University Press, New York, 1991), pp. 153-166.
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1972).
Rawls, J., Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press, New York, 1993).
Raz, J., The Morality of Freedom (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986).
Riphagen, M., “Over Natuur, Techniek en Fenomenologie,” [About Nature, Technology and Phenomenology] in L. Pijnenburg (ed.), Vijandbeelden in de Filosofie. Acta van de 19de Nederlands-Vlaamse Filosofiedag (Landbouwuniversiteit, Wageningen, 1997), pp. 233-240.
Thero, D. P., “Rawls and Environmental Ethics: A Critical Examination of the Literature,” Environmental Ethics 17 (1995), pp. 93-106.
Toulmin, S., “The Tyranny of Principles. Regaining the Ethics of Discretion,” The Hastings Center Report (December) (1981), pp. 31-39.
UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development), Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development (United Nations Publications, New York, 1992).
Verweij, M., Preventive Medicine. Between Obligation and Aspiration (Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, 1998).
Vollebergh, H., “Betwistbare (On)zekerheid. Het Nut van Geobjectiveerde Duurzame Risico's [Contested (Un)Certainty. The Value of Objectivated Sustainable Risks],” TPE 17(4) (1995), pp. 93-98.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), Our Common Future. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987).
Weston, A., “Beyond Intrinsic Value. Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics,” in A. Light and E. Katz (eds.), Environmental Pragmatism (Routledge, London, 1996), pp. 285-306.
Wissenburg, M., Green Liberalism. The Free and the Green Society (UCL Press, London, 1998).
Zweers, W., Participeren aan de Natuur. Ontwerp voor een Ecologisering van het Wereldbeeld [Participating in Nature. Design for a Naturalisation of our Worldview] (Uitgeverij Jan van Arkel, Utrecht, 1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beekman, V. Sustainable Development and Future Generations. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17, 3–22 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAGE.0000010842.88648.36
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAGE.0000010842.88648.36