Abstract
Animal husbandry has been accused ofmaltreating animals, polluting the environment, and soon. These accusations were thought to be answered whenthe Dutch research program ``Sustainable TechnologicalDevelopment'' (STD) suggested a government-initiatedconversion from meat to novel protein foods (NPFs).STD reasoned that if consumers converted from meat toNPFs, non-sustainable animal husbandry would no longerbe needed. Whereas STD only worried about how toconstruct NPFs with a meat bite, this paper drawsattention to the presumed, but problematic, role forthe government in the execution of the STDsuggestions. Although vegetarians take the credo ``YouAre What You Eat'' literally and accuse non-vegetariansof being beasts, a different interpretation is morepromising: eating meat has become a leading thread inmany lifestyles and narratives of self-identity. Sincethe freedom to follow your own lifestyle orconsumptive preferences is a core value incontemporary affluent societies, governmentintervention in the formation and satisfaction ofconsumer preferences for meat dishes is a precariousissue. Hence, NPFs might be interesting for a smallfraction of society, but we had better not expect toomuch from a government-initiated conversion from meatto NPFs as the answer to animal husbandry'sproblems.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Achterhuis, H., De Erfenis van de Utopie (Amsterdam: Ambo, 1998).
Berlin, I., Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969).
Bourdieu, P., Distinction (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1984).
Brink, B. van den, The Tragedy of Liberalism (Utrecht: Utrecht University, 1997).
Douglas, M., Thought Styles (London: Sage Publications, 1996).
Feinberg, J., Harm to Others (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).
Feinberg, J., Harm to Self(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).
Giddens, A., Modernity and Self-Identity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991).
Hartogh, G. den, “The Limits of Liberal Neutrality,” Philosophica 56(2) (1995), 59-89.
Jacobs, F. C. L. M., “Liberalisme en Paternalisme,” in A. W. Musschenga and F. C. L. M. Jacobs (eds.), De Liberale Moraal en haar Grenzen (Kampen: Kok, 1992), 219-237.
Kuijer, O. de, L. Jansen, and C. Bakker (eds.), DTO Sleutel Voeden (Den Haag: Interdepartementaal Onderzoekprogramma Duurzame Technologische Ontwikkeling, 1997).
Kymlicka, W., Contemporary Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).
MacIntyre, A., After Virtue (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981).
Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, Facts and Figures 1997/98 (The Hague, 1997).
Mulhall, S. and A. Swift, Liberals and Communitarians (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).
Newholm, T., “Consumer Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Indicative, Legitimation and Regulatory Role in Agricultural and Food Ethics,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12(2), pp. 153-164.
Parfit, D., Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).
Rawls, J., Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).
Raz, J., The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).
Rippe, K. P., “Novel Foods and Consumer Rights. Concerning Food Policy in a Liberal State,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12(1), pp. 71-80.
Sandel, M., Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).
Scoccia, D., “Paternalism and Respect for Autonomy,” Ethics 100 (1990), 318-334.
Taylor, C., Sources of the Self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books, 1983).
Wissenburg, M., Green Liberalism (London: UCL Press, 1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beekman, V. You are What You Eat: Meat, Novel Protein Foods, and Consumptive Freedom. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12, 185–196 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009555118131
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009555118131