Skip to main content
Log in

You are What You Eat: Meat, Novel Protein Foods, and Consumptive Freedom

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Animal husbandry has been accused ofmaltreating animals, polluting the environment, and soon. These accusations were thought to be answered whenthe Dutch research program ``Sustainable TechnologicalDevelopment'' (STD) suggested a government-initiatedconversion from meat to novel protein foods (NPFs).STD reasoned that if consumers converted from meat toNPFs, non-sustainable animal husbandry would no longerbe needed. Whereas STD only worried about how toconstruct NPFs with a meat bite, this paper drawsattention to the presumed, but problematic, role forthe government in the execution of the STDsuggestions. Although vegetarians take the credo ``YouAre What You Eat'' literally and accuse non-vegetariansof being beasts, a different interpretation is morepromising: eating meat has become a leading thread inmany lifestyles and narratives of self-identity. Sincethe freedom to follow your own lifestyle orconsumptive preferences is a core value incontemporary affluent societies, governmentintervention in the formation and satisfaction ofconsumer preferences for meat dishes is a precariousissue. Hence, NPFs might be interesting for a smallfraction of society, but we had better not expect toomuch from a government-initiated conversion from meatto NPFs as the answer to animal husbandry'sproblems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Achterhuis, H., De Erfenis van de Utopie (Amsterdam: Ambo, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I., Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., Distinction (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, B. van den, The Tragedy of Liberalism (Utrecht: Utrecht University, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., Thought Styles (London: Sage Publications, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J., Harm to Others (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J., Harm to Self(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., Modernity and Self-Identity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartogh, G. den, “The Limits of Liberal Neutrality,” Philosophica 56(2) (1995), 59-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, F. C. L. M., “Liberalisme en Paternalisme,” in A. W. Musschenga and F. C. L. M. Jacobs (eds.), De Liberale Moraal en haar Grenzen (Kampen: Kok, 1992), 219-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijer, O. de, L. Jansen, and C. Bakker (eds.), DTO Sleutel Voeden (Den Haag: Interdepartementaal Onderzoekprogramma Duurzame Technologische Ontwikkeling, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., Contemporary Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A., After Virtue (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, Facts and Figures 1997/98 (The Hague, 1997).

  • Mulhall, S. and A. Swift, Liberals and Communitarians (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newholm, T., “Consumer Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Indicative, Legitimation and Regulatory Role in Agricultural and Food Ethics,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12(2), pp. 153-164.

  • Parfit, D., Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippe, K. P., “Novel Foods and Consumer Rights. Concerning Food Policy in a Liberal State,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12(1), pp. 71-80.

  • Sandel, M., Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoccia, D., “Paternalism and Respect for Autonomy,” Ethics 100 (1990), 318-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C., Sources of the Self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wissenburg, M., Green Liberalism (London: UCL Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beekman, V. You are What You Eat: Meat, Novel Protein Foods, and Consumptive Freedom. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12, 185–196 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009555118131

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009555118131

Navigation