Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T17:13:07.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beyond personal ownership: Examining the complexities of ownership in culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2023

Russell W. Belk
Affiliation:
Schulich School of Business, York University, North York, ON, Canada rbelk@schulich.yorku.ca
Özgün Atasoy
Affiliation:
Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland ozgun.atasoy@unibas.ch

Abstract

We argue that ownership is a highly flexible concept, shaped by both innate and learned aspects, and heavily influenced by culture. Boyer's model focuses solely on universal personal ownership, neglecting other forms such as shared ownership, fractionalized property rights, and the ownership of the meanings and memories attached to possessions. A comprehensive understanding requires considering diverse human relationships with objects.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belk, R. (2020). Commodification as a part of marketization. In Chaudhuri, H. R. & Belk, R. W. (Eds.), Marketization: Theory and evidence from emerging economies (pp. 3172). Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. Free Press.Google Scholar
Rochat, P. (2014). Origins of possession: Owning and sharing in development. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widlok, T. (2017). Anthropology and the economy of sharing. Routledge.Google Scholar
Woodburn, J. (1982). Egalitarian societies. Man, 17(3), 431451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar