Skip to main content
Log in

Liberalization of Peru's formal seed sector

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the 1990s, the Government of Peru began to aggressivelyprivatize agriculture. The government stopped loaning money to farmers' cooperatives and closed the government rice-buying company. The government even rented out most of its researchstations and many senior scientists lost their jobs. As part of this trend, the government eliminated its seed certification agency. Instead, private seed certification committees were set up with USAID funding and technical advise from a US university. The committees were supposed to become self-financing (bycertifying seed grown by small seed producers) and each committee was supposed to encourage the development of a group of small seed-producing firms, clustered around the seedcertification agency. The amazing thing is that many of the seed committees actually accomplished these goals. The agronomists who staffed the committees stood by their jobs,even after US funding ended, even though the committees' income was (at best) modest, and occasionally under the threat of violence from the extreme left. Some seed certificationcommittees failed and others did not. Some of the problems with Peruvian agricultural liberalization can be seen in regard to the seed programs of maize, rice, potatoes, and beans. For example, the government abandoned most research, yet could not resist creating certain distortions in the seed market (e.g.,buying large amounts of seed and distributing them for political ends).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentley, J. W. and D. Vasques (1998). The Seed Potato System in Bolivia: Organisational Growth and Missing Links. London: ODI Agricultural Research and Extension Network (AgREN). Network Paper No. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Córdova, O. D., G. L. Tejada, and R. R. Portilla (1998). Supervisión y Evaluación a los Comités Departamentales y Regionales de Semilla. Informe Final. Lima: Ministerio de Agricultura (SENASA and Inspectoría General).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fano, H. (1999). La papa en el PerÚ. Lima: Ministerio de Agricultura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, S. and J. Srivastava (1994). “The roles of the private and public sectors in enhancing the performance of seed systems.” The World Bank Research Observer 9: 97-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg, J. (1988). First the Seed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pray, C. and B. Ramaswami (1991). A Framework for Seed Policy Analysis in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: IFPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • SENASA (1998). Productores de Semilla Registrados (Libro Antiguo y Libro Actual). Lima: Ministerio de Agricultura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, R. (ed.) (1997). New Seed and Old Laws. Regulatory Reform and the Diversification of National Seed Systems. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, R. (2000). Strategies for Seed System Development in Sub-Saharan Africa, ICRISAT Working Paper. Patancheru, India: ICRISAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, R. and S. Pal. (in press). “The Private delivery of public crop varieties. Rice in Andhra Pradesh.” World Development.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bentley, J.W., Tripp, R. & de la Flor, R.D. Liberalization of Peru's formal seed sector. Agriculture and Human Values 18, 319–331 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011986101112

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011986101112

Navigation