Skip to main content
Log in

Conjunction-based Sorites: A Misguided Objection to Degree-Theoretic (Fuzzy) Solutions to Sorites Paradoxes

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1987, Crispin Wright argued that degree-theoretic (fuzzy) solutions to the Sorites paradox fail because the solutions do not work when the paradox is restated using a conjunctive major premise. I show that Wright is incorrect: degree-theoretic solutions also work when the paradox is stated with a conjunctive major premise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Łukasiewicz, J., & Tarski, A. (1930). Untersuchungen über den Aussagenkalkül. Comptes rendus des séances de la Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie, 23(iii), 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hájek, P. (1998). Metamathematics of fuzzy logic. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gottwald, S. (2001). A Treatise on many-valued logics. Baldock: Research Studies Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merrie Bergmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergmann, M. Conjunction-based Sorites: A Misguided Objection to Degree-Theoretic (Fuzzy) Solutions to Sorites Paradoxes. J Philos Logic 39, 1–4 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-009-9121-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-009-9121-y

Keywords

Navigation