Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:51:42.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Health Care Reform to Public Health Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Micah L. Berman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

According to Congressional Budget Office projections, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act or Act) — assuming it survives the pending legal challenges and is fully implemented — will provide health insurance to 34 million additional Americans by 2021. This will increase the percentage of non-elderly Americans with health insurance from the current rate of 83 percent to 95 percent. Although enactment of the Affordable Care Act constitutes a historic step forward in the nearly century-long effort to ensure universal health insurance coverage, relatively little in the Act focused on the potentially transformative impact of public health efforts that prevent disease. Chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer, stroke, and diabetes are now responsible for more than 75 percent of health care costs, and reducing the incidence of these diseases — which are often entirely preventable — could dramatically improve the nation’s physical and fiscal health.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , Fall 2011 , pp. 328 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Congressional Budget Office, “CBO's Analysis of the Major Health Care Legislation Enacted in March 2010,” available at <http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/121xx/doc12119/03–30-Health-CareLegislation.pdf> (last visited June 6, 2011). (last visited June 6, 2011).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Congressional+Budget+Office,+“CBO's+Analysis+of+the+Major+Health+Care+Legislation+Enacted+in+March+2010,”+available+at++(last+visited+June+6,+2011).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Chronic Diseases,” available at <http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/AAG/chronic.htm> (last visited June 6, 2011); Williams, D. R. et al., “Beyond the Affordable Care Act: Achieving Real Improvements in Americans' Health,” Health Affairs 29, no. 8 (2010): 1481–1488: At 1481 (“Although improved access to health care is essential…reducing the risk of getting sick in the first place is even more important to improving the nation's health.”).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gostin, L. O. Bloche, M. G., “Politics of Public Health: A Response to Gostin,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46, no. 3, Supp. (2003): S160–S175, at S163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinnis, J. M. et al., “The Case for More Active Policy Attention to Health Promotion,” Health Affairs 21, no. 2 (2002): 78–93, at 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farley, T. A., “Reforming Health Care or Reforming Health?” American Journal of Public Health 99, no. 4 (2009): 588–590, at 589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, M. L., “A Public Health Perspective on Health Care Reform,” Health Matrix 21, no. 2 (2011): 352–383.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Parmet, W. E., Populations, Public Health, and the Law (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2010): At 17.Google Scholar
See Berman, , supra note 7, at 360–361.Google Scholar
Schneider, M., Introduction to Public Health, 3rd ed. (Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2011): At 6.Google Scholar
Ashton, J. Seymour, H., The New Public Health (Milton Keynes and Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1988): At vii.Google ScholarPubMed
Id.Google Scholar
Baum, F., The New Public Health, 3rd. ed. (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2008): At 14.Google Scholar
See Farley, , supra note 6, at 589.Google Scholar
See Berman, , supra note 7, at 356–360.Google Scholar
See Ashton, Seymour, , supra note 12, at vii.Google Scholar
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. 111–148,” 1001 (2010).Google Scholar
See Berman, , supra note 7, at 372.Google Scholar
See Mokdad, A. H. et al., “Actual Causes of Death in the United States, 2000,” JAMA 291, no. 10 (2004): 1238–1245, at 1238 (finding that “[t]he leading causes of death in 2000 were tobacco (435,000 deaths; 18.1% of total US deaths), poor diet and physical inactivity (400,000 deaths; 16.6%), and alcohol consumption (85,000 deaths; 3.5%)”).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, J. Yosifon, D., “The Situational Character: A Critical Realist Perspective on the Human Animal,” Georgetown Law Journal 93, no. 1 (2004): 1–179, at 177–178.Google Scholar
Id., at 6.Google Scholar
See Baum, , supra note 14, at 473. The impact of such educational campaigns is “particularly limited in disadvantaged communities.” Id., at 475.Google Scholar
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111–148,” 4004 (2010).Google Scholar
Id. § 4206.Google Scholar
See Baum, , supra note 14, at 472 (spelling modified).Google Scholar
See Yosifon, D. G., “Resisting Deep Capture: The Commercial Speech Doctrine and Junk-Food Advertising to Children,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 39, no. 1 (2006): 507–601, at 591.Google Scholar
Gostin, L. O., Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint, 2nd ed. (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2008): At 4.Google Scholar
Callahan, D. Jennings, B., “Ethics and Public Health: Forging a Strong Relationship,” American Journal of Public Health 92, no. 2 (2002): 169–176, at 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, e.g., Tucker, C., “Behavior the Best Medicine?” Atlanta Journal-Constitution, April 18, 2010, at 22A (summarizing Republican criticisms that the Affordable Care Act would undermine “personal responsibility”).Google Scholar
Langer, G., “Poll: Concern, But Little Action on Obesity,” ABC News, May 30, 2004, available at <http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/Living/Obesity_poll_040530.html> (last visited June 6, 2011).+(last+visited+June+6,+2011).>Google Scholar
Sherry, K., “Uphill Climb for ‘Prevention’; GOP Legislators See No Health Savings in Parks and Similar Projects,” Chicago Tribune, August 5, 2009, at C14.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Editorial, “So Much for that Ounce of Prevention,” New York Times, April 25, 2011, at 24.Google Scholar
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111–148, § 1501 (2010).Google Scholar
Parmet, W. E., “The Individual Mandate: Implications for Public Health Law,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39, no. 3 (2011): 401–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. A., “The Scope and Limits of Public Health Law,” Perspective in Biology and Medicine 46, no. 3, Supp. (2003): S199–209, at S206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Benforado, A. Hanson, J., “The Great Attributional Divide: How Divergent Views of Human Behavior Are Shaping Legal Policy,” Emory Law Journal 57, no. 2 (2008): 311–408, at 324–325.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id., at 324.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M. B. Brownell, K.D., “Actions Necessary to Prevent Childhood Obesity: Creating the Climate for Change,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35, no. 1 (2007): 78–89, at 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownell, K. D. et al., “Personal Responsibility and Obesity: A Constructive Approach to a Controversial Issue,” Health Affairs 29, no. 3 (2010): 378–386, at 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id., at 384–385.Google Scholar
Office of the First Lady, “Remarks by the First Lady at a Grocery Manufacturers Association Conference,” March 16, 2010, available at <http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-first-lady-a-grocery-manufacturers-association-conference> (last visited June 6, 2011).+(last+visited+June+6,+2011).>Google Scholar
See Malone, R. E., “The Tobacco Industry,” in Wiist, W. H., ed., The Bottom Line or Public Health (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2010): At 167, 171.Google Scholar
Gostin, L. O. Gostin, K. G., “A Broader Liberty: JS Mill, Paternalism, and the Public's Health,” Public Health 123, no. 3 (2009): 214–221, at 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Benning v. Vermont, 641 A.2d 757, 762 (Vt. 1994) (“Although plaintiffs argue that the only person affected by the failure to wear a helmet is the operator of the motorcycle, the impact of that decision would be felt well beyond that individual. Such a decision imposes great costs on the public…. Whether in taxes or insurance rates, our costs are linked to the actions of others and are driven up when others fail to take preventive steps that would minimize health care consumption.”).Google Scholar
See Gostin, Gostin, , supra note 46.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Gostin, also notes that “[a]nother defense of paternalism holds that people face constraints (both internal and external) on the capacity to pursue their own interests.” Id. (spelling modified). This argument concedes that public health regulations are paternalistic, but argues that they can be justified by the cognitive constraints and cultural influences that make it difficult for people to make decisions that are in their own best interest. Although people do indeed face such cognitive limitations, justifying public health interventions on this basis is a political non-starter. As mentioned in the text, people are deeply committed to the belief that they are fully autonomous, rational agents, however erroneous that belief may be.Google Scholar
See id., at 215.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, “Obesity and Overweight,” March 2011, available at <http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html> (last visited June 6, 2011) (noting that “[o]nce considered a high-income country problem, overweight and obesity are now on the rise in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in urban settings”).+(last+visited+June+6,+2011)+(noting+that+“[o]nce+considered+a+high-income+country+problem,+overweight+and+obesity+are+now+on+the+rise+in+low-+and+middle-income+countries,+particularly+in+urban+settings”).>Google Scholar
See Brownell, et al., supra note 42, at 379.Google Scholar
Those who view public health issues through the individualist/biomedical perspective often fail to recognize that public health issues pose collective action problems because they see individual decision making as the key to health. See, e.g., Epstein, R., “In Defense of the ‘Old’ Public Health: The Legal Framework for the Regulation of Public Health,” Brooklyn Law Review 69, no. 4 (2006): 1421–1470, at 1425–1426. But when the “public health paradigm” is employed, the collective action problems are apparent. For example, “[a]gricultural subsidies have helped bring us high-fructose corn syrup, factory farming, fast food, a two-soda-a-day habit and its accompanying obesity,” but no individual has an incentive to push for reforming such incentives. M. Bittman, “Don't End Agricultural Subsidies, Fix Them,” New York Times, March 1, 2011, available at <http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/01/dont-end-agricultural-subsidies-fix-them/> (last visited June 6, 2011). To the contrary, the higher cost of unsubsidized products is likely to be much more salient to individuals than the more diffuse public health benefits.Google Scholar
See Korobkin, R., “Libertarian Welfarism,” California Law Review 97, no. 6 (2007): 1651–1685, at 1676–1677.Google Scholar
See Parmet, , supra note 9, at 17.Google Scholar
Emphasis on the democratic process should not be misconstrued as license to trample on individual rights. The objections to public health policies, however, are often grounded in an overbroad conception of individual rights and business rights that has no basis in law. For example, there simply is no constitutionally protected “right to smoke,” and smoke-free laws do not impinge on the legal rights of either smokers or business owners. See Graff, S. K., Tobacco Control Legal Consortium, “There Is No Constitutional Right to Smoke: 2008,” available at <http://publichealthlawcenter.org/sites/default/files/resources/tclc-syn-constitution-2008_0.pdf> (last visited June 6, 2011).+(last+visited+June+6,+2011).>Google Scholar
See supra note 20 and accompanying text; see also National Prevention Council, “National Prevention Strategy: America's Plan for Better Health and Wellness,” available at <http://www.healthcare.gov/center/councils/nphpphc/strategy/report.pdf> (last visited June 18, 2011) (listing “Tobacco Free Living,” “Preventing Drug Abuse and Excessive Alcohol Use,” “Healthy Eating,” and “Active Living” among the nation's top preventive health priorities). (last visited June 18, 2011) (listing “Tobacco Free Living,” “Preventing Drug Abuse and Excessive Alcohol Use,” “Healthy Eating,” and “Active Living” among the nation's top preventive health priorities).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=See+supra+note+20+and+accompanying+text;+see+also+National+Prevention+Council,+“National+Prevention+Strategy:+America's+Plan+for+Better+Health+and+Wellness,”+available+at++(last+visited+June+18,+2011)+(listing+“Tobacco+Free+Living,”+“Preventing+Drug+Abuse+and+Excessive+Alcohol+Use,”+“Healthy+Eating,”+and+“Active+Living”+among+the+nation's+top+preventive+health+priorities).>Google Scholar
Brownell, K. D. Frieden, T. R., “Ounces of Prevention – The Public Policy Case for Taxes on Sugared Beverages,” New England Journal of Medicine 360, no. 18 (2009): 1805–1808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
For a list of the group's members, visit <http://nofoodtaxes.com/about/#coalition> (last visited June 6, 2011). (last visited June 6, 2011).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=For+a+list+of+the+group's+members,+visit++(last+visited+June+6,+2011).>Google Scholar
Hamburger, T. Geiger, K., “Soda Tax Fizzles: Targeting Lawmakers and Nutritionists, Beverage Firms Put a Stopper in Campaign,” Los Angeles Times, February 7, 2010, at A1.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See generally Nestle, M., Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health, 2nd ed. (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2007) (discussing efforts by various industries to influence food-related policies); McGarity, T. O. Wagner, W. E., Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008) (surveying efforts by tobacco manufacturers, asbestos producers, and others to manipulate or mischaracterize scientific findings in order to avoid regulation or liability).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
This effort to control the terms in which a problem is conceptualized and discussed has been referred to by David Yosifon and Jon Hanson as “deep capture.” See, e.g., Hanson, J. Yosifon, D., “The Situation: An Introduction to the Situational Character, Critical Realism, Power Economics, and Deep Capture,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152, no. 1 (2003): 129–346.Google Scholar
Americans Against Food Taxes, “Camping” (Television Commercial) (2010), available at <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zmDwMNaTzA&NR=1> (last visited June 6, 2011).+(last+visited+June+6,+2011).>Google Scholar
Chaloupka, F. J. et al., “Effectiveness of Tax and Price Policies in Tobacco Control,” Tobacco Control 20, no. 3 (2011): 235–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiist, W. H., “Public Health and the Anticorporate Movement: Rationale and Recommendations,” American Journal of Public Health 96, no. 8 (2006): 1370–1375, at 1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, D. S. Nestle, M., “Can the Food Industry Play a Constructive Role in the Obesity Epidemic?” JAMA 300, no. 15 (2008): 1808–1811, at 1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, e.g., Kluger, R., Ashes to Ashes: America's Hundred-Year Cigarette War, the Public Health, and the Unabashed Triumph of Philip Morris (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1997): At 333–334 (discussing how the tobacco industry inserted a preemption provision into the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act “that would have an effect not fully grasped by [tobacco control advocates] for the better part of twenty years”). The impact of the 2009 Federal Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, which was the product of negotiations between tobacco control advocates and Philip Morris, has yet to be seen. Cf. Glantz, S. A. et al., “Compromise or Capitulation” US Food and Drug Administration Jurisdiction Over Tobacco Products,” PLoS Medicine 6, no. 7 (2007): e1000118, at 2.Google Scholar
See, e.g., North Carolina Gen. Stat. § 130A-491 (2011); Lexington Fayette County Food & Bev. Ass'n v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Gov't, 131 S.W.3d 745 (Ky. 2004) (upholding Lexington, Kentucky's smoke-free law).Google Scholar
See Mello, M. M., “New York City's War on Fat,” New England Journal of Medicine 360, no. 19 (2009): 2015–2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Complete Streets Coalition, “Complete Streets Policy Analysis 2010: A Story of Growing Strength,” available at <http://www.completestreets.org/webdocs/resources/cs-policyanalysis.pdf> (last visited June 6, 2011).+(last+visited+June+6,+2011).>Google Scholar
See Ashe, M. et al., “Land Use Planning and the Control of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Fast Food Restaurants,” American Journal of Public Health 93, no. 9 (2003): 1404–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Glennon, T., “Lawyers and Caring: Building an Ethic of Care into Professional Responsibility,” Hastings Law Journal 43, no. 4 (2009): 1175–1186, at 1177 (“[Legal] faculty reinforce the vision of a social world peopled by separate individuals in competition with one another through both the content of their courses and the teaching methodologies they employ. The legal system is presented as an endless series of bipolar disputes, of individual persons or businesses in competition before the courts. Each dispute appears as unconnected to other disputes. The parties are isolated from social or institutional structures. Issues of race, gender and class are often muted. Legal disputes that do not appear in judicial opinions simply do not exist.”).Google Scholar
See Parmet, , supra note 9, at 55.Google Scholar
Id., at 54; see also Hanson, Yosifon, , supra note 21, at 13–20 (discussing examples of how “dispositionism” is embedded into various doctrinal fields of law).Google Scholar
See Rabin, R. L., “Institutional and Historical Perspectives on Tobacco Tort Liability,” in Rabin, R. L. Sugarman, S. D., eds., Smoking Policy: Law, Politics, and Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993): 110–130, at 122–125 (discussing the tobacco companies' use of the assumption of risk defense and their attempts to codify a “common-knowledge defense”); Parmet, , supra note 9 at 225 (explaining the individualistic assumptions underlying the assumption of risk defense).Google Scholar
“Jones/Day Liability Summary” (1986) (Bates No. 681879272), available at <http://tobaccodocuments.org/landman/37575.html#images> (last visited June 6, 2011) (emphasis added).+(last+visited+June+6,+2011)+(emphasis+added).>Google Scholar
Newby, P. K., “Moving Forward the Discussion on Childhood Obesity,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35, no. 1 (2007): 7–9 (introducing symposium articles considering “solutions beyond the individual”).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Parmet, , supra note 9.Google Scholar
See Leonard, E. W., “State Constitutionalism and the Right to Health Care,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 12, no. 5 (2010): 1325–1406, at 1379.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. J. et al., “Lloyd K. Garrison Lecture Reunion and Roundtable Transcript,” Pace Environmental Law Review 19, no. 2 (2002): 755–804, at 756 (discussing the conscious decision by legal academics and practitioners to establish environmental law as a distinct field in the late 1960s).Google Scholar
See Gostin, , supra note 28, at 4.Google Scholar