Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:12:52.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Many Feminists Does It Take To Make A Joke? Sexist Humor and What's Wrong With It

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Memo Bergmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper I am concerned with two questions: What is sexist humor? and what is wrong with it? To answer the first question, I briefly develop a theory of humor and then characterize sexist humor as humor in which sexist beliefs (attitudes/norms) are presupposed and are necessary to the fun.

Concerning the second question, I criticize a common sort of argument that is supposed to explain why sexist humor is offensive: although the argument explains why sexist humor feels offensive, it does not place responsibility for the offense in the humorist or audience that enjoys sexist humor. I develop an alternate account of the offense in sexist humor that places responsibility for offense in precisely those quarters.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , Spring 1986 , pp. 63 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergson, Henry. 1956. Laughter. In Comedy edited by Sypher, Wylie. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne. 1974. A rhetoric of irony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, Anthony J. and Gadfield, Nicholas J., 1976. Is sexual humor sexist? Journal of Communication 26 (3): 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ted. 1978. Metaphor and the cultivation of intimacy. Critical Inquiry 5 (1): 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sousa, Ronald. 1981. The ethics of laughter. University of Toronto. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Eastman, Max. 1937. The enjoyment of laughter. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Gruner, Charles R. 1978. Understanding laughter. Chicago: Nelson‐Hall.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter. 1982. Laughter. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 61 (Supp. vol.): 213–228.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1960. Observations on the feeling of the beautiful and the sublime. Trans. Goldthwait, John T. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Gloria and Blakely, Mary Kay. 1982. Pulling our own strings. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Cromwell. 1970. A book. Scarborough, Ontario: The Vanity Press.Google Scholar
Koestler, Arthur. 1975. The act of creation. London: Pan Books.Google Scholar
Korsmeyer, Carolyn. 1977. The hidden joke: Generic uses of masculine terminology. In Feminism and philosophy, edited by Vetterling‐Braggin, Mary, Elliston, Frederick H. and English, Jane. Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams & Co.Google Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris. 1981. Women and men speaking. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Maria, (surname unpublished). 1981. Do feminists laugh? Open Forum (Dartmouth College) (Nov. 1).Google Scholar
Miller, Casey and Swift, Kate. 1977. Words and women. Garden City, NJ: Anchor/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Monro, D. H. 1951. Argument of laughter. Victoria: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Morreall, John. 1982. A new theory of laughter. Philosophical Studies 42: 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morreall, John. 1983. Taking laughter seriously. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, George M. 1980. Towards a cognitive model of humor. Smith College. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Weisstein, Naomi. 1973. Why we aren't laughing …anymore. Ms 2 (5): 49–51 and 88–90.Google Scholar