Abstract
When I was pondering what I should write about Lakatos in this article, I ran into what seemed an insuperable difficulty. On one hand I thought that part of my job should be to give a portrait of Lakatos’ personal manner. This would be informative from the point of view of history of thought, as it would help people read his works with greater understanding. And it would be interesting, if I succeeded at all: everyone who knew Lakatos would agree that he was one of the most remarkable people they had met. On the other hand memorial essays tend to give portraits which are all sweetness and light. But such a portrait of Lakatos would not be a portrait of Lakatos. Everyone has his dark and his light side; sometimes we see one, occasionally the other. But in Lakatos both were simultaneously and brilliantly displayed at every instant. It would be trying to describe bitter sweet chocolate with the vocabulary for milk chocolate. On the other hand, to give no description at all would be a real loss.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Agassi, J., ‘Sensationalism’, Mind (1966); ‘The Nature of Scientific Problems and Their Roots in Metaphysics’, in M. Bunge (ed.), The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy.
Berkson, W., Fields of Force: The Development of a World View from Faraday To Einstein; ‘Review of Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge’, in The Journal of Critical Analysis 4, No. 3; ‘Rationality and Science’, talk given before the 1974 Philosophy of Science Association.
Feyerabend, P., ‘Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism’, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3.
Finocchiaro, M., ‘Review of Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge’, in Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 3, No. 4.
Lakatos, Imre, ‘Proofs and Refutations’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (1963–64). ‘Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69; ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs’ in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, and ‘History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions’, in PSA 1970, vol. VIII of Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (ed. by R. Buck and R. Cohen), D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Popper, Karl, Logic of Scientific Discovery, Conjectures and Refutations, Objective Knowledge (especially ‘The Aim of Science); and ‘Replies to Lakatos’ in P. A. Schupp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berkson, W. (1976). Lakatos One and Lakatos Two: An Appreciation. In: Cohen, R.S., Feyerabend, P.K., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1451-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1451-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0655-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1451-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive