Proclus' Commentary on the Cratylus in Context: Ancient Theories of Language and NamingThe Cratylus contains Plato s important, yet ambiguous discussion of language. By studying the reception of this text in antiquity, this book explores the various ideas on language and its relation to philosophy in the Platonic tradition. This discussion provides the backdrop for a detailed analysis of the commentary on the dialogue by Proclus. His, often original, views on language are, it appears, the product of a critical reevaluation of those of his predecessors, whereas his interpretation of the Cratylus throws new light on that dialogue. This book will thus be of interest both to students of Plato and the Platonic tradition, as well as to those working on ancient theories of language. |
Contents
Scene | 1 |
Chapter | 31 |
Chapter Three | 61 |
Chapter Four | 93 |
Chapter Five | 135 |
Divine Names | 161 |
Chapter Seven | 201 |
Bibliography | 219 |
Indices | 229 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
according Alcinous Ammonius ancient appears argues argument Aristotle Aristotle’s Àrst assumes believes called Categories cause chapter claim Commentary commentators concepts contains convention correctness correctness of names Crat Cratylus critical deÀnition derives Dexippus dialectic dialectician dialogue discussion distinguishes divide divine names especially eternal etymology example existence explains expression fact follows Forms give given gods Greek hand hence Hermogenes holds human Iamblichus images important indicates individuals Intellect intelligible interest interpretation issue knowledge language logical look material matter means Middle name-giver nature Neoplatonists objects observes ordinary Parm particular passage philosophical Plato Platonists Plotinus Porphyry position present primarily Proclus Proclus In Crat question reality realm reason refers relation remark seems seen semantic theory sense sensible Socrates soul sounds statues Stoic suggests things thought trans translation true turn types understand universe whereas Zeus μ μ