Skip to main content
Log in

Relational and Intrinsic Moral Roots: A Brief Contrast of Confucian and Hindu Concepts of Duty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Analects. 2003. Edward Slingerland, trans. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagavad Gitā. 2004. Barbara Stoller-Miller, trans. New York: Bantam Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boodberg, Peter. 1953. “The Semasiology of Some Primary Confucian Concepts.” Philosophy East and West 2: 317–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjea, Tara. 2002. Knowledge and Freedom in Indian Philosophy. London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Qiyong 郭齊勇. 2007. “Is Confucian Ethics a Consanguinism?” Dao 6: 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Qingping 劉清平. 2007. “Confucianism and Corruption: An Analysis of Shun’s Two Actions Described by Mencius.” Dao 6: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mencius. 2003. D.C. Lau, trans. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas L. Berger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berger, D.L. Relational and Intrinsic Moral Roots: A Brief Contrast of Confucian and Hindu Concepts of Duty. Dao 7, 157–163 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9063-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9063-z

Keywords

Navigation