The Metaphoric Fallacy to a Deductive Inference

Authors

  • Michael P Berman Brock University
  • Brian A Lightbody Brock University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v30i2.1192

Keywords:

metaphor, fallacy, analogy, critical thinking, reasoning

Abstract

Our article identifies and describes the metaphoric fallacy to a deductive inference (MFDI) that is an example of incorrect reasoning along the lines of the false analogy fallacy. The MFDI proceeds from informal semantical (metaphorical) claims to a supposedly formally deductive and necessary inference. We charge that such an inference is invalid. We provide three examples of the MFDI to demonstrate the structure of this invalid form of reasoning. Our goal is to contribute to the set of known informal fallacies.

Author Biographies

Michael P Berman, Brock University

Associate Professor

Philosophy Department

Brian A Lightbody, Brock University

Assistant Professor Philosophy Department

Downloads

Published

2010-07-20

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 2 (2010)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright for each article published in Informal Logic belongs to its author(s). Informal Logic has the right of first publication. Permission to reprint any article that appears in Informal Logic MUST be obtained in writing from the author(s). In addition to any form of acknowledgement required by the author(s), the following notice must be added to the statement of copyright permission made in the reprint (with the appropriate numbers replacing the ellipses): [Article Title] was originally published in Informal Logic, [year], Volume ..., Number ..., pp. ...-... .