Abstract
The Müller-Lyer illusion is the natural consequence of the construction of the vertebrate eye, retina and visual processing system. Due to imperfections in the vertebrate eye and retina and due to the subsequent processing in the system by ever increasing receptive fields, the visual information becomes less and less precise with respect to exact location and size. The consequence of this is that eventually the brain has to calculate ‘a weighted mean value’ of the information, which is spread out over a population of neurons. In the case of the Müller-Lyer illusion this inevitably leads to extension of one and reduction of the other line. The arguments presented explain several published experimental results concerning the Müller-Lyer illusion and shed new light upon the philosophical neutrality of observation sentences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auerbach, F.: 1894, ‘Erklärung der Brentanoschen optischen Täuschung’,Zeitschrift für Psychologie III, 498–504.
Brentano, F.: 1889, ‘Optische Urteilstäuschungen’,Dubois-Reymonds Archiv für Physiologie VII, 263–270.
Churchland, P.: 1988, ‘Perpetual Plasticity and Theoretical Neutrality: A Reply to Jerry Fodor’,Philosophy of Science 55, 167–187.
Coren, S. and Girgus, J.S.: 1978,Seeing is Deceiving, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
Cowey, A. and Stroerig, P.: 1992, ‘Reflexions on Blindsight’, in A.D. Milner and M.D. Rugg (eds),The Neuropsychology of Consciousness, Academic Press, London, pp. 11–37.
Dennett, D.: 1978,Brainstorms, Harvester Press, Hassocks.
Ebbinghaus, H.: 1913,Grundzüge der Psychologie, Ullmann, Leipzig.
Fodor, J.A.: 1983,The Modularity of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Fodor, J.A.: 1984, ‘Observation Reconsidered’,Philosophy of Science 51, 23–43.
Fodor, J.A.: 1988, ‘A Reply to Churchland's Perceptual Plasticity and Theoretical Neutrality’,Philosophy of Science 55, 188–198.
Galambos, R. Norton, T.T., and Frommer, G.P.: 1967, ‘Optic Tract Lesions Sparing Pattern Vision in Cats’,Experimental Neurology 18, 8–25.
Goldberg, M.E., Eggers, H.M. and Gouras, P.: 1991, ‘The Ocular Motor System’, in E.R. Kandel, J.H. Schwartz and T.M. Jessell (eds.),Principles of Neural Science. Elsevier., New York, 3rd ed., Amsterdam, pp. 660–680.
Gregory, R.L.: 1970,The Intelligent Eye, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.
Heymans, G.: 1895, ‘Quantitative Untersuchungen ueber das “Optisches Paradoxon”’,Zeitschrift für Psychologie IX, 221–255.
Hubel, D.H.: 1988,Eye Brain and Vision, The Scientific American Library, New York.
Hubel, D.H. and Wiesel, T.N.: 1977, ‘Functional Architecture of Macaque Monkey Visual Cortex’,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 198, 1–59.
Kalat, J.W.: 1992,Biological Psychology, 4th ed., Wadsworth, Belmont.
Kandel, E.R.: 1991, ‘Perception of Motion, Fepth, and Gorm’, in E.R. Kandel, J.H. Schwartz and T.M. Jessell (eds.),Principles of Neural Science 3rd ed, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 400–465.
Kandel, E.R. and Jessell, T.M.: 1991, ‘Touch’, in E.R. Kandel, J.H. Schwarzz and T.M. Jessell: 1991,Principles of Neural Science, Elsevier, New York, Amsterdam, pp. 367–385.
Lipps, Th.: 1892, ‘Zu Fr.Brentano's “Ueber ein Optisches Paradoxon”’,Zeitschrift für Psychologie III, 498–504.
Mahowald. M.A. and Mead, M.P.: 1991, ‘The Silicon Retina: A Chip Based on the Neural Architecture of the Eye Proves a New, More Powerful Way of Doing Computations’,Scientific American 5, 40–46.
Müller-Lyer, F.C.: 1889, ‘Optiche Urteilstäuschungen’,Dubois-Reymonds Archiv für Physiologie VII, 263–270.
Müller-Lyer, F.C.: 1896, ‘Ueber Kontrast und Konfluxion’,Zeitschift für Psychologie X, 421–431.
Quine, W.V.O.: 1993, ‘In Praise of Observation Sentences’,Journal of Philosophy 3, 107–117.
Révész, G.: 1934, ‘System der optischen und haptischen Raumtäuschungen’,Zeitschrift für Psychologie 131, 296–375.
Rhodes, R. and Planzer, R.: 1989,Human Physiology, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Orlando.
Rock, I.: 1984,Perception, Freeman & Co, New York and Oxford.
Routenberg, A.: 1980, ‘Redundency in the Nervous System as Substrate for Consciousness: Relation to Anatomy and Chemistry of Remembering’, in J.M. Davidson and R.J. Davidson (eds.),The Psychobiology of Consciousness, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 105–127.
Segall, M.H., Campbell, D.T., and Herskovits, M.J.: 1963, ‘Cultural Differences in the Perception of Geometric Illusions’,Science 139, 769–771.
Tessier-Lavigne, M.: 1991, ‘Phototransduction and Information Processing in the Retina’, in E.R. Kandel, J.H. Schwartz and T.M. Jessell (eds.),Principles of Neuroscience, 3rd ed., Elsevier, New York, Amsterdam, pp. 400–420.
Van den Berg, T.J.T.P.: 1990, ‘Intraoculair strooilincht’,Klinische Fysica 4, 139–142.
Van den Berg, T.J.T.P., IJspeert, J.K. and De Waard, P.W.T.: 1991, ‘Dependence of Intraocular Straylight on Pigmentation and Light Transmission through the Ocular Wall’,Vision Research 31, 1361–1367.
Van Heerden, J. and Draaisma, D.: 1992, ‘De Müller-Lyer Illusie’, in D. Draaisma (ed.),Een Laboratorium voor de Ziel, Historische Uitgeverij, Groningen, pp. 40–52.
Van Norren, D. and Tiemeijer, L.F.: 1986, ‘Spectral Reflectance of the Human Eye’,Vision Research 26, 313–320.
Weikrantz, L., Wattington, E.K., Sanders, M.D. and Marchal, J.: 1974, ‘Visual Capacity in the Hemianoptic Field Following a Restricted Occipital Ablation’,Brain 97, 709–728.
Wundt, W.: 1893,Grundzüge der Physiologische Psychologie, Verlag von Wilhem Engelmann, Leipzig.
Zeki, S.: 1992, ‘The Visual Image in Mind and Brain’,Scientific American, September, 69–76.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bermond, B., Van Heerden, J. The Muller-Lyer illusion explained and its theoretical importance reconsidered. Biol Philos 11, 321–338 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128785
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128785