Abstract
This article discusses how inference to the best explanation (IBE) can be justified as a practical meta-argument. It is, firstly, justified as a practical argument insofar as accepting the best explanation as true can be shown to further a specific aim. And because this aim is a discursive one which proponents can rationally pursue in—and relative to—a complex controversy, namely maximising the robustness of one’s position, IBE can be conceived, secondly, as a meta-argument. My analysis thus bears a certain analogy to Sellars’ well-known justification of inductive reasoning (Sellars, In: Essays in honour of Carl G. Hempel, 1969); it is based on recently developed theories of complex argumentation (Betz, In: Theorie dialektischer Strukturen, 2010a).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Betz, G. (2010a). Theorie dialektischer Strukturen. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
Betz G. (2010b) Petitio principii and circular argumentation as seen from a theory of dialectical structures. Synthese 175(3): 327–349
Betz G. (2012a) On degrees of justification. Erkenntnis 77(2): 237–272
Betz, G. (2012b). Debate dynamics: How controversy improves our beliefs. Synthese Library. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bondarenko A., Dung P. M., Kowalski R. A., Toni F. (1997) An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 93(1–2): 63–101
Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C. (2005). On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation framesworks. In ECSQARU, pp. 378–389
Dung P. M. (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2): 321–358
Earman J. (1992) Bayes or bust? A critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Prentice-Hall foundations of philosophy series. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hitchcock, C. (2007). The lovely and the probable. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXXIV(2), 433–440.
Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (2005). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach (3rd edn.). Chicago: Open Court.
Hume D. (1935) Dialogues concerning natural religion. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lipton P. (2004) Inference to the best explanation. Routledge, London
Losee J. (2001) A historical introduction to the philosophy of science. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mayo D. (1996) Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Okasha S. (2000) Van Fraassen’s critique of inference to the best explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31A(4): 691–710
Railton P. (1978) A deductive-nomological model of probabilistic explanation. Philosophy of Science 45(2): 206–226
Schupbach, J. N. (2011). Studies in the logic of explanatory power. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Schupbach J. N., Sprenger J. (2011) The logic of explanatory power. Philosophy of Science 78(1): 105–127
Sellars W. (1969) Are there non-deductive logics?. In: Rescher N. (eds) Essays in honour of Carl G. Hempel. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 83–103
Thagard P. (1988) Computational philosophy of science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Thagard P. (1992) Conceptual revolutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton
van Fraassen B. C. (1989) Laws and symmetry. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Weber M. (2009) The crux of crucial experiments: Duhem’s problem and inference to the best explanation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60(1): 19–49
Williams B. (1973) Deciding to believe. In: Williams B. (eds) Problems of the self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 136–151
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
The Below is the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Betz, G. Justifying inference to the best explanation as a practical meta-syllogism on dialectical structures. Synthese 190, 3553–3578 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0210-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0210-z