Abstract
Rationality in decision making is commonly assessed by comparing choice performance against normative standards. We argue that such a performance-centered approach blurs the distinction between rational choice and adaptive behavior. Instead, rational choice should be assessed with regard to the way individuals make analytic decisions. We suggest that analytic decisions can be made in two different modes in which control processes are directed at different levels. In a RUN mode, thought is directed at controlling the operation of a decision strategy. In the JUMP mode, the individual analyses the interpretation of the decision situation as well as the appropriateness of alternative strategies. We suggest that a decision should be considered “rational” when an individual is able to switch between these modes and balance their interaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson NH (1971) Integration theory and attitude change. Psychol Rev 78:171–206
Athay M, Darley JM (1981) Toward an interaction-centered theory of personality. In: Cantor N, Kihlstrom JF (eds) Personality, cognition and social interaction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 281–308
Atkinson JW (1957) Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychol Rev 64:359–372
Beach LR, Mitchell TR (1978) A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Acad Manage Rev 3:439–449
Betsch T (2005) Preference theory—an affect-based approach to recurrent decision making. In: Betsch T, Haberstroh S (eds) The routines of decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J, pp 39–65
Betsch T, Glöckner A (2010) Intuition in judgment and decision making: extensive thinking without effort. Psychol Inq 21:279–294
Betsch T, Haberstroh S (2005) Research on the routines of decision making: advances and prospects. In: Betsch T, Haberstroh S (eds) The routines of decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 359–376
Betsch T, Fiedler K, Brinkmann J (1998) Behavioral routines in decision making: the effects of novelty in task presentation and time pressure on routine maintenance and deviation. Eur J Soc Psychol 28:861–878
Betsch T, Haberstroh S, Glöckner A, Haar T, Fiedler K (2001) The effects of routine strength on information acquisition and adaptation in recurrent decision making. Organ Behav Hum Dec 84:23–53
Betsch T, Haberstroh S, Molter B, Glöckner A (2004) Oops, I did it again—relapse errors in routinized decision making. Organ Behav Hum Dec 93:62–74
Camerer CF, Hogarth RM (1999) The effects of financial incentives in experiments: a review and capital‐labor‐production framework. J Risk Uncertain 19:7–42
Davidson D (1982) Rational animals. Dialectica 36:318–327
Edwards W (1954) The theory of decision making. Psychol Bull 51:380–417
Epstein S (2010) Demystifying intuition: what it is, what is does, and how it does it. Psychol Inq 21:295–312
Evans JStBT (2008) Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 59:255–278
Evans JStBT (2010) Intuition and reasoning: a dual process perspective. Psychol Inq 21:313–326
Fazio RH (1990) Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: the MODE model as an integrative framework. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 23:75–109
Fiedler K (2001) Affective states trigger processes of assimilation and accommodation. In: Martin LM, Clore GL (eds) Theories of mood and cognition: a user’s guidebook. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 85–98
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1974) Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychol Rev 81:59–74
Flavell L (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. Am Psychol 34:906–911
Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, The ABC Research Group (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gladwell M (2005) Blink: the power of thinking without thinking. Penguin, London
Glöckner A, Betsch T (2008) Modelling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgm Dec Mak 3:215–228
Haines BA, Moore C (2003) Integrating themes from cognitive and social cognitive development into the study of judgment and decision making. In: Schneider SL, Shanteau J (eds) Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 246–283
Hertwig R, Ortmann A (2001) Experimental practices in economics: a methodological challenge for psychologists. Behav Brain Sci 24:383–451
Hogarth RM (2010) The challenge of intuition. Psychol Inq 21:338–353
Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (eds) (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Klein G (1999) Sources of power—how people make decisions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Korsgaard C (2009) The activity of reason. Proc Address APA 83:23–41
Kruglanski A, Gigerenzer G (2011) Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychol Rev 118:97–109
Künzler R, Bakker CM (2001) Female preferences for single and combined traits in computeranimated stickleback males. Behav Ecol 12:681–685
Nisbett RE, Ross L (1980) Human inference and shortcoming of social judgment. Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, NJ
Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1988) Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. J Exp Psychol Learn 14:534–552
Piaget J, Inhelder B (1951/1975) The origin of the idea of chance in children. London
Searle (2001) Rationality in action. MIT Press, Cambridge
Siegler RS (1996) Emerging minds: the process of change in children’s thinking. Oxford University Press, New York
Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69:99–118
Stanovich KE (2009) Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: is it time for a tri-process theory? In: Evans J, Frankish K (eds) In two minds: dual processes and beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, pp 55–88
Stanovich KE, West RE, Toplak ME (2011) The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models. Dev Rev 31:103–118
Wilson TD, Schooler JW (1991) Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. J Pers Soc Psychol 60:181–192
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Betsch, T., Held, C. Rational decision making: balancing RUN and JUMP modes of analysis. Mind Soc 11, 69–80 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-011-0097-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-011-0097-2