Skip to main content
Log in

Hermeneutics and Science Education: The role of history of science

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eger's contribution towards a reapprochment of Hermeneutics, Science and Science Education is very welcome. His focus on the problem of misconceptions is relevant. All the same in our opinion some not minor points need a clarification. We will try to argue that: a) Hermeneutics cannot be reduced to a semantical interpretation of science texts; its phenomenological aspects have to be taken in account. b) Science has an unavoidable historical dimension; original papers and advanced textbooks are the real depositaries of scientific research. Standard textbooks are a caricature not worth it of a hermeneutical analysis. c) A parallelism can be traced between two dicothomies: the lifeworld of hermeneutics and the scienceworld of epistemology on one side and the extraordinary and the normal science on the other. d) For an overcoming of the misconceptions' problem we propose that the previous dicothomies be bridged through a hermeneutical phenomenological approach to science education that stresses the alternative, historical interpretations of natural phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apel, K.O.: 1973, 1976, Transformation der Philosophie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

  • Apel, K.O.: (in press), History of Science as a Problem of Hermeneutics. An Argument with Karl Popper's “Third-World”-Hermeneutics, Proceedings of the “Conference on Science and Hermeneutics” (Veszprém 1993), O. Kiss & L. Ropolyi (eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht.

  • Blumenberg, H.: 1960, Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie, Bonn.

  • Blumenberg, H.: 1981, Die Lesbarkeit der Welt, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R.: 1979, ‘Metaphor and Theory Change: What is “Metaphor” and Metaphor for?’, in Metaphor and Thought, A. Ortony (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchdahl, G.: 1992, Kant and the Dynamics of Reason, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchdahl, G.: 1993, Science & Education 2, 149–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eger, M.: 1993, Science & Education 1, 337–348; 1993, Science & Education 2, 1–29 and 303–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.G.: 1960, 1965, Wahrheit und Methode, Mohr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannetto, E.: (in press), Heidegger and the Question of Physics, Proceedings of the “Conference on Science and Hermeneutics” (Veszprém 1993), O. Kiss & L. Ropolyi (eds), Reidel, Dordrecht.

  • Giannetto, E., Tarsitani, C. & Vicentini, M.: 1992, ‘The Relations between Epistemology, History of Science and Science Teaching from the Point of View of the Research on Mental Representations’, in The History and Philosophy of Science in Science Education, S. Hill (ed.), University of Kingston, Kingston, 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.: 1927, Sein und Zeit, Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.: 1954, ‘Die Frage nach der Technik’, in Vorträge und Aufsätze, Neske, Pfullingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.: 1959, Unterwegs zur Sprache, Neske, Pfullingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.: 1954, 1959, Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie, in Husserliana, Gesammelte Werke 6, Nijhoff, The Hague.

  • Kuhn, T.S.: 1979, ‘Metaphor in Science’, in Metaphor and Thought, A. Ortony (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.: 1994, History, Philosophy and Science Teaching: A Useful Alliance, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olby, R.C., Cantor, G.N., Christie, J.R.R. & Hodge M.J.S. (eds.): 1990, Companion to the History of Modern Science, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H.: 1902, La science et l'hypothèse, Flammarion, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H.: 1905, La valeur de la science, Flammarion, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (ed.): 1967, The Linguistic Turn, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1991, ‘Is Natural Science a Natural Kind?’, in Objectivity, Relativism and Truth. Philosophical Papers I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1979, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1914, Our Knowledge of the External World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, J.A. (guest ed.): 1993, The Big Picture, a special issue of the British Journal for the History of Science 26(91).

  • Whitehead, A.N.: 1920, The Concept of Nature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1922, Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung. Tractatus logico-philosophicus, with an introduction by B. Russell, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophische Untersuchungen. (Philosophical Investigations), Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bevilacqua, F., Giannetto, E. Hermeneutics and Science Education: The role of history of science. Sci Educ 4, 115–126 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486579

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486579

Keywords

Navigation