Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T15:33:11.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Traditional prejudice remains outside of the WEIRD world

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2012

Michal Bilewicz
Michal Bilewicz*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Center for Research on Prejudice, University of Warsaw, 00-183 Warsaw, Poland. bilewicz@psych.uw.edu.plhttp://bilewicz.socialpsychology.org/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dixon et al. accurately describe subtle mechanisms of discrimination that inhibit minorities' collective action in modern democratic societies. This commentary suggests that in contemporary non-Western societies, where ethnic conflicts are more violent, traditional overt forms of prejudice still exist and predict discrimination of ethnic and racial minorities. Thus, prejudice reduction models should and do improve intergroup relations in such contexts.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 6 , December 2012 , pp. 427 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, G. (1954) The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1999) Moral disengagement in the preparation of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review 3:193–209.Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M. & Krzemiński, I. (2010) Anti-Semitism in Poland and Ukraine: The belief in Jewish control as a mechanism of scapegoating. International Journal of Conflict and Violence 4 234–43.Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M. & Vollhardt, J. R. (2012) Evil transformations: Psychological processes underlying genocide and mass killing. In: Social psychology of social problems. The intergroup context, ed. Golec De Zavala, A. & Cichocka, A., pp. 280–307. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M., Winiewski, M., Kofta, M. & Wojcik, A. (in press) Harmful ideas. The structure and consequences of anti-Semitic beliefs in Poland. Political Psychology.Google Scholar
Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A. & O'Brien, L. T. (2002) Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82:359–78.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Brigham, J. C., Johnson, B. T. & Gaertner, S. L. (1996) Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: Another look. In: Stereotypes and stereotyping, ed. Macrae, C. N., Stangor, C. & Hewstone, M., pp. 276–319. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
EVS (2011) European Values Study 2008: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2008) GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4800 Data file Version 3.0.0, DOI: 10.4232/1.11004.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, W. W. & Blakely, E. J. (2010) Separate societies: Poverty and inequality in U.S. cities, Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. (2010) The weirdest people in the world? Brain and Behavioral Sciences 33:61–135.Google Scholar
Imhoff, R., Bilewicz, M. & Erb, H.-P. (2012) Collective regret versus collective guilt: Different emotional reactions to historical atrocities. European Journal of Social Psychology. 42:729–42. DOI:10.1002/ejsp.1886.Google Scholar
Kanyangara, P., Rimé, B., Philippot, P. & Yzerbyt, V. (2007) Collective rituals, emotional climate, and intergroup perception: Participation in “Gacaca” tribunals and assimilation of the Rwandan genocide. Journal of Social Issues 63:387–403.Google Scholar
Küpper, B., Wolf, C. & Zick, A. (2010) Social status and anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: An examination from the perspective of social dominance theory. International Journal of Conflict and Violence 4:205–19.Google Scholar
Marcu, A. & Chryssochoou, X. (2005) Exclusion of ethnic groups from the realm of humanity: Prejudice against the Gypsies in Britain and in Romania. Psicologia Politica 30:41–56.Google Scholar
McGrane, J. A. & White, F. A. (2007) Differences in Anglo and Asian Australians' explicit and implicit prejudice and the attenuation of their in-group bias. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 10:204–10.Google Scholar
Nadler, A. (2002) Inter-group helping relations as power relations: Helping relations as affirming or challenging inter-group hierarchy. Journal of Social Issues 58:487–503.Google Scholar
Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F. & Pratto, F. (2009) The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science 20:114–21.Google Scholar
Shnabel, N. & Nadler, A. (2008) A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential needs of victim and perpetrator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94:116–32.Google Scholar
Tileagă, C. (2007) Ideologies of moral exclusion: A critical discursive reframing of depersonalization, delegitimization and dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology. 46:717–37.Google Scholar
Winiewski, H. M. (2010) Warmth and competence as a structure of stereotype content. Modification and application of BIAS map model to individual-level cognitions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Wright, S. C. & Lubensky, M. (2009) The struggle for social equality: Collective action vs. prejudice reduction. In: Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities, ed. Demoulin, S., Leyens, J. P. & Dovidio, J. F., pp. 291–310. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Zawadzki, B. (1948) Limitations of the scapegoat theory of prejudice. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 43(2):127–41.Google Scholar