Skip to main content
Log in

\( LE^{t}_{ \to } \), \(LR^{ \circ }_{{\widehat{ \sim }}}\), LK and Cutfree Proofs

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two consecution calculi are introduced: one for the implicational fragment of the logic of entailment with truth and another one for the disjunction free logic of nondistributive relevant implication. The proof technique—attributable to Gentzen—that uses a double induction on the degree and on the rank of the cut formula is shown to be insufficient to prove admissible various forms of cut and mix in these calculi. The elimination theorem is proven, however, by augmenting the earlier double inductive proof with additional inductions. We also give a new purely inductive proof of the cut theorem for the original single cut rule in Gentzen’s sequent calculus \( LK \) without any use of mix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D.: Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. I., Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, A. R., Belnap, N. D., and Dunn, J. M.: Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. II, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belnap, N. D. and Wallace, J. R.: A decision procedure for the system \( E_{{\overline{I} }} \), of entailment with negation. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 11 (1965), 277–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bimbó, K.: Admissibility of cut in LC with fixed point combinator. Studia Logica 81 (2005), 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bimbó, K.: Relevance logics, in D. Jacquette (ed.), Philosophy of logic, vol. 5 of Handbook of the philosophy of science. D. Gabbay, P. Thagard and J. Woods (eds.), Elsevier (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 2007, pp. 723–789.

  6. Bimbó, K. and Dunn, J. M.: Two extensions of the structurally free logic \( LC \), Logic Journal of IGPL 6 (1998), 403–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunn, J. M.: Relevance logic and entailment, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 3, 1st edn., Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986, pp. 117–229.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dunn, J. M. and Meyer, R. K.: Combinators and structurally free logic, Logic Journal of IGPL 5 (1997), 505–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gentzen, G.: Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen, I, Mathematische Zeitschrift 39 (1935a), 176–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gentzen, G.: Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen, II, Mathematische Zeitschrift 39 (1935b), 405–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Negri, S. and von Plato, J.: Structural Proof Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thistlewaite, P. B., McRobbie, M. A., and Meyer, R. K.: Automated Theorem Proving in Non-classical Logics, Pitman, London, UK, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Troelstra, A. S. and Schwichtenberg, H.: Basic proof theory, in Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 43, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katalin Bimbó.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bimbó, K. \( LE^{t}_{ \to } \), \(LR^{ \circ }_{{\widehat{ \sim }}}\), LK and Cutfree Proofs. J Philos Logic 36, 557–570 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-007-9048-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-007-9048-0

Key words

Navigation