Skip to main content
Log in

Anvil or Onion? Determinism as a Layered Concept

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kellert (In the Wake of Chars, University of Chicago press, Chicago, 1993) has argued that Laplacean determinism in classical physics is actually a layered concept, where various properties or layers composing this form of determinism can be peeled away. Here, I argue that a layered conception of determinism is inappropriate and that we should think in terms of different deterministic models applicable to different kinds of systems. The upshot of this analysis is that the notion of state is more closely tied to the kind of system being investigated than is usually considered in discussions of determinism. So when investigating determinism corresponding changes to the appropriate notion of state – and, perhaps, the state space itself – also need to be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D. Albert (2000) Time and Chance Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmanspacher H. (1994). ‘Is the Ontic/Epistemic Distinction Sufficient to Describe Quantum Systems Exhaustively?’. In: Laurikainen K., Montonen C., Sunnarborg K. (ed). Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1994, Editions Frontières, Gif-sur-Yvette, pp. 15–32

  • H. Atmanspacher R.C. Bishop A. Amann (2002) ‘Extrinsic and Intrinsic Irreversibility in Probabilistic Dynamical Laws’ A. Khrennikov (Eds) Quantum Probability and White Noise Analysis Volume XIII. World Scientific Singapore 50–70

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Atmanspacher F.K. Kronz (1999) ‘Relative Onticity’ H. Atmanspacher A. Amann U. Müller-Herold (Eds) On Quanta, Mind and Matter: Hans Primas in Context. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 273–294

    Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Batterman (1993) ArticleTitle‘Defining Chaos’ Philosophy of Science. 60 43–66 Occurrence Handle10.1086/289717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. d’Espagnat (1994) Veiled Reality: An Analysis of Present-Day Quantum Mechanical Concepts Addison-Wesley Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Earman (1986) A Primer on Determinism D. Reidel Publishing Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Earman (2002) ArticleTitle‘What Time Reversal Invariance Is and Why It Matters’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 16 245–264 Occurrence Handle10.1080/0269859022000013328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Fine (1971) ‘Probability in Quantum Mechanics and Other Statistical Theories’ M. Bunge (Eds) Problems in the Foundations of Physics. Springer-Verlag New York 79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Glymour (1971) ArticleTitle‘Determinism, Ignorance, and Quantum Mechanics’ The Journal of Philosophy 68 744–751

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hobbs (1991) ArticleTitle‘Chaos and Indeterminism’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 141–164

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kellert (1993) In the Wake of Chaos University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Laplace (1814/1951) A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities Dover Publications New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague R. (1974). Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, R. H. Thomason (ed.). Yale University Press, New Haven

  • H. Primas (1990) ‘Mathematical and Philosophical Questions in the Theory of Open and Macroscopic Quantum Systems’ A. Miller (Eds) Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty. Plenum New York 233–257

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Primas (1994) ‘Endo- and Exotheories of Matter’ H. Atmanspacher G. Dalenroot (Eds) Inside Versus Outside. Springer-Verlag Berlin 163–193

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Russell (1953) ‘On the Notion of Cause, with Applications to the Free-Will Problem’ H. Feigl M. Brodbeck (Eds) Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Appleton-Century-Crofts Inc New York 387–418

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Scheibe (1964/1973) The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics Pergamon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A. Stone (1989) ArticleTitle‘Chaos, Prediction and Laplacean Determinism’ American Philosophical Quarterly 26 123–131

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Teller (1979) ArticleTitle‘Quantum Mechanics and the Nature of Continuous Physical Magnitudes’ Journal of Philosophy 76 345–361

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Fraassen Particlevan (1989) Laws and Symmetry Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Fraassen Particlevan (1991) Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricists View Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • R.C. Bishop (2002) ‘Deterministic and Indeterministic Descriptions’ H. Atmanspacher R.C. Bishop (Eds) Between Chance and Choice. Imprint Academic Thorverton 5–31

    Google Scholar 

  • R.C. Bishop (2003) ArticleTitle‘On Separating Predictability and Determinism’ Erkenntnis 58 169–188 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1022003805614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop R.C.: submitted ‘What Could Be Worse than the Butterfly Effect?’

  • Bishop, R.C. and Kronz, F.K.:(1999). ‘Is Chaos Indeterministic?’ in M. Dalla Chiara, R. Guintini and f. Laudisa (eds.). Language, Quantum, Music: Selected Contributed Papers of the Tenth International Congress of Logic, Methodology & Philosophy of Science, Florence, August 1995, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp. 129–41

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert C. Bishop.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bishop, R.C. Anvil or Onion? Determinism as a Layered Concept. Erkenntnis 63, 55–71 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-0363-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-0363-y

Keywords

Navigation