Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T08:29:34.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bindra's S-S contiguity theory of instrumental, learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

M. E. Bitterman
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Sensory Sciences, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Birch, H. G., and Bitterman, M. E.Reinforcement and learning: The process of sensory integration. Psychological Review. 56:292308, 1949.Google Scholar
Ellison, D. G., and Konorski, J.Separation of salivary and motor responses in instrumental conditioning. Science. 146:1071–2.1964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guthrie, E. R.The Psychology of Learning. New York, Harper & Brothers, 1935.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L.Principles of Behavior. New York: D. Appleton-Century Company, 1943.Google Scholar
A Behavior System. New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Lashley, K. S.Studies of cerebral functions in learning. IV. The theory that synaptic resistance is reduced by the passage of the nerve impulse. Psychological Review. 31:360–75.1924.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N. J.The Psychology of Animal Learning. New York, Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Mowrer, O. H.Learning Theory and Behavior. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1960.Google Scholar
Spence, K. W.Behavior Theory and Conditioning. New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar