Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Downward causation without foundations

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emergence is interpreted in a non-dualist framework of thought. No metaphysical distinction between the higher and basic levels of organization is supposed, but only a duality of modes of access. Moreover, these modes of access are not construed as mere ways of revealing intrinsic patterns of organization: They are supposed to be constitutive of them, in Kant’s sense. The emergent levels of organization, and the inter-level causations as well, are therefore neither illusory nor ontologically real: They are objective in the sense of transcendental epistemology. This neo-Kantian approach defuses several paradoxes associated with the concept of downward causation, and enables one to make good sense of it independently of any prejudice about the existence (or inexistence) of a hierarchy of levels of being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apel K. O. (1984) Understanding and explanation: A transcendental-pragmatic perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmanspacher H., Filk T., Römer H. (2004) Quantum Zeno features of bistable perception. Biological Cybernetics 90: 33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batten, D. (2008, April 12–16). Demystifying emergence. Presentation at the conference emergence in the physical and biological world: A notion in search of clarification, Erice, Italy.

  • Beck L. W. (1963) A commentary on Kant’s critique of practical reason. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau M. (2002) Downward causation and the autonomy of weak emergence. Principia 6: 5–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau M. (2008a) Is weak emergence just in the mind. Minds and Machines 18(4): 443–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedau, M. (2008b, April 12–16). Pluralism about emergence. Presentation at the conference emergence in the physical and biological world: A notion in search of clarification, Erice, Italy.

  • Bensaude-Vincent B. (2005) Faut-il avoir peur de la chimie. Les Empêcheurs de Penser en Rond, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bich L. (2009) Downward causation and relatedness in emergent systems: Epistemological remarks. In: Minati G., Pessa E., Abram M. (eds) Processes of emergence of systems and systemic properties: Towards a general theory of emergence. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 591–602

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard M., Campbell D. T. (2000) Emergence. In: Andersen P. B., Emmeche C., Finnemann N. O., Christiansen P. V. (eds) Downward causation. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, pp 322–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol M. (1996) Schrödinger’s philosophy of quantum mechanics. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol M. (1997) Mécanique quantique, une introduction philosophique. Flammarion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol M. (1998) Some steps towards a transcendental deduction of quantum mechanics. Philosophia Naturalis 35: 253–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol M. (2000) Physique quantique et cognition. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 54: 299–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol M. (2001) Non-representationnalist theories of cognition and quantum mechanics. SATS (Nordic Journal of Philosophy) 2: 37–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol M. (2007a) Ontology, matter and emergence. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science 6: 293–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol M. (2007b) Materialism, stances, and open-mindedness. In: Monton B. (eds) Images of empiricism: Essays on science and stances, with a reply from Bas C. van Fraassen. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 229–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol M. (2008a) Is consciousness primary. NeuroQuantology 6: 53–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol M. (2008b) Consciousness, situations, and the measurement problem of quantum mechanics. NeuroQuantology 6: 203–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol, M. (Ed.). (2009). Théorie quantique et sciences humaines (CNRS éditions).

  • Bitbol, M. (2010). De l’intérieur du monde, Pour une philosophie des relations. Paris: Flammarion.

  • Campbell, R. J., & Bickhard, M. H. (2009). Physicalism, emergence, and downward causation. Synthese (in press).

  • Castellani E. (2002) Reductionism, emergence, and effective field theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33: 251–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Tannoudji C., Diu B., Laloe F. (2006) Quantum mechanics. Wiley Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon T. W. (2003) The hierarchic logic of emergence: Untangling the interdependence of evolution and self-organization. In: Weber B., Depew D. (eds) Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 273–308

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Espagnat B. (1989) Conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducheyne S. (2006) Galileo’s interventionist notion of ‘cause’. The Journal of the History of Ideas 67: 443–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. (1983) Sour grapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche C., Köppe S., Stjernfelt F. (2000) Levels, emergence, and three versions of downward causation. In: Andersen P. B., Emmeche C., Finneman N. O., Christiansen P. V. (eds) Downward causation, minds, bodies, and matter. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, pp 13–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei G. (1612) Discorso intorno alle cose che stanno in su l’aqua o che in quella si muovono In Opere I. (Torino U.T.E.T).

  • Geiser, F., & Halbrecht, U. (2008). Fear that freezes blood in your veins. Retrieved 20 August 2009, from http://www.uni-bonn.de/Press-releases/110_2008/.

  • Gibson J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies D. (2005) An action-related theory of causality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56: 823–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann S. (2001) Effective field theories: Reductionism and scientific explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32: 267–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hladik J. (1971) Elements de chimie quantique. Dunod, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer J. (1997) Biosemiotics: Towards a new synthesis in biology. European Journal for Semiotic Studies 9: 355–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys P. (1997) How properties emerge. Philosophy of Science 64: 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1955) Prolegomena to any future metaphysics. Open Court, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1987) Critique of judgment. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1992) Concerning the ultimate ground of the differentiation of directions in space. In: Walford D., Meerbote R. (eds) The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant. Theoretical philosophy 1755–1770. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 361–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1996) Critique of pure reason. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (2002) Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. (1999) Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies 95: 3–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kistler M. (1999) Causalité et lois de la nature. Vrin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • La Mura P. (2005) Correlated equilibrium of classical strategic game with quantum signals. International Journal of Quantum Information 3: 183–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert A., Zamir S., Zwirn H. (2006) Type indeterminacy: A model of the KT (Kahneman– Tversky)-man. Cornell University Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas E. (2001) En découvrant l’existence avec Husserl et Heidegger. Vrin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Libet, B., Freeman, A., Sutherland, J. K. B. (eds) (1999) The volitional brain: Towards a neuroscience of free will. Imprint Academic, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana H. R., Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maudlin T. (1998) Part and whole in quantum mechanics. In: Castellani E. (eds) Interpreting bodies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 46–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies P., Price H. (1993) Causation as a secondary quality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill J. S. (1851) System of logic. John W. Parker, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee H. H. (2000) Causation, control, and the evolution of complexity. In: Andersen P. B., Emmeche C., Finneman N. O., Christiansen P. V. (eds) Downward causation, minds, bodies, and matter. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, pp 63–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitmengin C., Navarro V., Baulac M. (2006) Seizure anticipation: Are neuro-phenomenological approaches able to detect preictal symptoms. Epilepsy and Behavior 9: 298–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price H. (1992) Agency and causal asymmetry. Mind 101: 501–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen R. (1991) Life itself: A comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin, and fabrication of life. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon W. (1984) Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E. (1935/1983). The present situation of quantum mechanics. In J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek (Eds.), Quantum theory and measurement (pp. 152–167). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Seevinck, M. P. (2003). Holism, physical theories and quantum mechanics. In International workshop on Holism in the philosophy of physics, Bonn, 4–5 July 2003. Retrieved 12 August 2009, from http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002191/.

  • Stephan A. (1998) Varieties of emergence in artificial and natural systems. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 53: 639–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller P. (1995) An interpretive introduction to quantum field theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. (1976). Not one, not two. The Coevolution Quarterly, 11(Fall), 62–67.

  • Vemulapalli G. K. (2003) Property reduction in chemistry. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 988: 90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright G. H. (1974) Causality and determinism. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber A., Varela F. J. (2002) Life after Kant. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1: 97–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J. (2003) Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CREA, CNRS/Ecole Polytechnique, ENSTA/CREA 32, Bd. Victor, Paris, 75015, France

    Michel Bitbol

Authors
  1. Michel Bitbol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Bitbol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bitbol, M. Downward causation without foundations. Synthese 185, 233–255 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9723-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9723-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation