Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Raz on Necessity

  • Published:
Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Aristotle, The Complete Works of Aristotle (J. Barnes, ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (W.E. Rumble, ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bix, B., ‘Conceptual Jurisprudence and Socio-Legal Studies’, Rutgers Law Journal 32 (2000): 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bix, B., Jurisprudence: Theory and Context, 2nd ed. (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bix, B., ‘Patrolling the Boundaries: Inclusive Legal Positivism and the Nature of Jurisprudential Debate’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12 (1999): 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S., The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, S. J., ‘Law, Obligation, and a Good Faith Claim of Justice’, California Law Review 73 (1985): 1956–1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, M. T., Cicero: De Re Publica, De Legibus (C.W. Keyes, trans., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1928).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, F., ‘Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach’, Columbia Law Review 35 (1935): 809–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. L., ‘Incorporationism, Conventionality, and the Practical Difference Thesis’, Legal Theory 4 (1998a): 381–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. L., ‘Methodology’, in Jules L. Coleman and Scott Shapiro (eds.), Kenneth Einar Himma (assoc. ed.), Handbook of Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 311–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. L., The Practice of Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. L., ‘Second Thoughts and Other First Impressions’, in B. Bix (ed.), Analyzing Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998b), pp. 257–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, J., Evaluation and Legal Theory (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R., Law's Empire (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R., ‘Legal Theory and the Problem of Sense’, in R. Gavison (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987), pp. 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R., ‘On Gaps in the Law’, in P. Amselek and N. MacCormick (eds.), Controversies About Law's Ontology (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1991), pp. 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R., ‘A Reply’, in M. Cohen (ed.), Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence (London: Duckworth, 1984), pp. 247–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, J., Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W. B., ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1955–56): 167–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettier, E. L., ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’, Analysis 23 (1963): 121–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, H.-J., A Wittgenstein Dictionary (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A.,The Concept of Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F., From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, M. H., In Defense of Legal Positivism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. A., Naming and Necessity (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, B., ‘Naturalism in Legal Philosophy’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyc-lopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu (Spring 2003 edition) (last revised July 15, 2002).

  • Leiter, B., ‘Realism, Hard Positivism, and Conceptual Analysis’, Legal Theory 4 (1998): 533–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucy, W., Understanding and Explaining Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, D., ‘Book Review’ (reviewing Neil MacCormick, H. L. A. Hart), Cornell Law Review 68 (1983): 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, D., Ethics and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L.,Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. S., ‘Hart's Concluding Scientific Postscript’, Legal Theory 4 (1998): 301–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. S., ‘Law as a Functional Kind’, in R. P. George (ed.), Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), pp. 188–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, L., ‘The Political Question of the Concept of Law’, in J. L. Coleman (ed.), Hart's Postscript (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 371–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. R., ‘Interpretation and Methodology’, in A. Marmor (ed.), Law and Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), pp. 97–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. R., ‘The Varieties of Legal Positivism’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 9 (1996): 361–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putman, H., ‘The Meaning of "Meaning"’, in Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers Vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 215–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., The Authority of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., The Concept of a Legal System, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., Engaging Reason (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., Ethics in the Public Domain (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., ‘Legal Theory’, in M. P. Golding and W. A. Edmundson (eds.), Black-well Guide to The Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, forthcoming).

  • Raz, J., The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., ‘On the Nature of Law’ (Kobe Lectures of 1994), Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie 82 (1996): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., ‘Postema on Law's Autonomy and Public Practical Reasons: A Critical Comment’, Legal Theory 4 (1988): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., Practical Reason and Norms, rev. ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., The Practice of Value (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., ‘Two Views of the Nature of the Theory of Law: A Partial Comparison’, Legal Theory 4 (1998): 249–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., Value, Respect, and Attachment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A., On Law and Justice (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauer, F., ‘Critical Notice of Roger Shiner, Norm and Nature: The Movements of Legal Thought’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24 (1994): 495–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauer, F., ‘Fuller's Internal Point of View’, Law and Philosophy 13 (1994): 285–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, P., ‘Legal Systems, Normative Systems, and the Paradoxes of Positivism’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 8 (1995): 363–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavropoulos, N., Objectivity in Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamanaha, B. Z., ‘Conceptual Analysis, Continental Social Theory, and CLS: A Response to Bix, Rubin and Livingston’, Rutgers Law Journal 32 (2000): 281–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamanaha, B. Z., ‘The Folly of the "Social Scientific" Concept of Legal Plur-alism’, Journal of Law and Society 20 (1993): 192–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamanaha, B. Z., Realistic Socio-Legal Theory: Pragmatism and a Social Theory of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamanaha, B. Z., ‘Socio-legal Positivism and a General Jurisprudence’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (2001): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waluchow, W. J., Inclusive Legal Positivism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Minnesota, The Law School, 229 – 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN, 55455-0400, USA

    Brian H. Bix

Authors
  1. Brian H. Bix
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bix, B.H. Raz on Necessity. Law and Philosophy 22, 537–559 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025995612621

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025995612621

Keywords

Search

Navigation