Abstract
To contribute to the organizational turn in research on participatory democracy, this paper examines the effects of organizational hierarchy on individual thinking. Power corrupts, but neither political scientists nor psychologists can really tell us how. To identify mechanisms by which it does so, the paper introduces recent advances in the field of cognitive psychology, here to suspicious political theorists. The study of cognition shows that we actively make meaning, and that we do so with a discernable neurological apparatus. The paper presents hierarchy as a social construct that ‘fits’ this apparatus in such a way as to assist the capture of meaning by the interests of power. This process of capture takes place beneath individual awareness. For this reason, the concern here amounts to ideology critique: specifically, using cognitive psychology to reveal the ideological propagation of hierarchy. The fact that hierarchy has hidden cognitive costs has important implications for the prospects of a more participatory democracy. Any democratization of organizational life is seen to turn on the capacity of participants to selectively use and manage hierarchy and to minimize its cognitive costs. This entails, among other things, a recovery of our own thinking from the knowledge processing requirements of power saturated hierarchic organizations. In its examination of the personal effects of power, the paper seeks to reveal psychological mechanisms by which power corrupts, and by which, inadvertently, we come to serve the interests of power in the very way we think.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acton, E.E.D. (1887) ‘Letter to Mandell Creighton’, April 5, 1887.
Anderson, J.R. (1995) Cognitive Psychology and its Implications, New York: Freeman.
Ashenden, S. and Owen, D. (1999) Foucault Contra Habermas: Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory, London: Sage.
Augoustinos, M. and Walker, I. (1996) Social Cognition, London: Sage.
Bartlett, F.A. (1932) A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baynes, K. (1992) ‘Liberal neutrality, pluralism, and deliberative politics’, Praxis International 12 (1): 50–69.
Benveniste, G. (1996) ‘Survival Inside Bureaucracy’, in G. Thompson, J. Frances, R. Levacic and J. Mitchell (eds.) Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1967) The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Doubleday.
Blaug, R. (2002) ‘Blind hierarchism and radical organizational forms’, New Political Science 2 (3): 379–396.
Boulding, K.E. (1956) ‘The economics of knowledge and the knowledge of economics’, American Economic Review 56/1-2: 1–13.
Broadbent, D. (1958) Perception & Communication, London: Pergamon Press.
Chandler, A. (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1972) Language and Mind, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Clegg, C. (1994) ‘Psychology and Information Technology: the study of cognition in organizations’, British Journal of Psychology 85/4: 449–487.
Cohen, S. (2001) States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Connolly, W.E. (2002) Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
David, P. (1975) Technical Choice, Innovation and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deleuze, G. (1994) Difference and Repetition, New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987) A Thousand Plateaus, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Depret, E.F. and Fiske, S.T. (1993) ‘Social Cognition and Power: Some Cognitive Consequences of Social Structure as a Source of Control Deprivation’, in W.F. Gleicher and K. Marsh (eds.) Control Motivation and Social Cognition, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 176–202.
Dewey, J. (1988) The Public and its Problems, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Douglas, M. (1986) How Institutions Think, London: Routledge.
Durkheim, E. (1982) The Rules of Sociological Method, London: Macmillan.
Eder, K. (1993) The New Politics of Class: Social Movements and Cultural Dynamics in Advanced Societies, London: Sage.
Elster, J. (1983) Explaining Technical Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, J.St.B.T. (1989) Bias in Human Reasoning: Causes and Consequences, London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge, New York: Random House.
Freud, A. (1961) The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence, New York: International Universities Press.
Goffman, E. (1990) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, London: Penguin.
Haney, C., Banks, W.C. and Zimbardo, P.G. (1973) ‘Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison’, International Journal of Criminology and Penology 1: 69–97.
Haslam, S.A. (2001) Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1977) The Phenomenology of Spirit, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyppolite, J. (1974) Genesis and Structure of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1958) The Leviathan, New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
James, W. (1983) The Principles of Psychology, Cambridge: Harvard University Press [1890].
Johnson-Laird, P. (1983) Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kahneman, D. (1973) Attention and Effort, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (1982) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D.H. and Anderson, C. (2003) ‘Power, approach, and inhibition’, Psychological Review 110 (2): 265–284.
Kipnis, D. (1972) ‘Does power corrupt?’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24 (1): 33–41.
Kipnis, D. and Rind, B. (1999) ‘Changes in self-perceptions as a result of successfully persuading others’, Journal of Social Issues, Spring.
Kipnis, D. (1976) The Powerholders, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kohut, H. (1971) The Analysis of the Self, New York: International Universities Press.
Lauer, Q. (1982) A Reading of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, New York: Fordham University Press.
Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. (1967) Organization and Environment, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lenski, G.E. (1984) Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Lukács, G. (1971) History and Class Consciousness, London: Merlin [1923].
Lukes, S. (2004) Power: A Radical View, New York: New York University Press.
Lukes, S. (1970) ‘Some Problems About Rationality’, in Wilson, B.R. (ed.) Rationality, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Machiavelli, N. (1979) ‘The Prince’, in P. Bondanella and M. Musa (eds.) The Portable Machiavelli, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Marglin, S.A. (1978) ‘What Do Bosses Do? The Origins and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production’, in A. Gorz (ed.) The Division of Labour: The Labour Process and Class-Struggle in Modern Capitalism, London: Harvester, pp. 13–54.
Marx, K. (1974) Capital, Vol. 1, New York: International Publishers [1867].
Mbembe, A. (1992) ‘The banality of power and the aesthetics of vulgarity in the postcolony’, Public Culture 4: 1–30.
McIntosh, J. (1998) ‘Symbolism, cognition, and political orders’, Science and Society 62 (4): 557–568.
Michels, R. (1958) Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.
Mill, J.S. (1972) Utilitarianism, On Liberty and Considerations on Representative Government, London: Dent.
Minow, M. (1990) Making All the Difference, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Passerin d’Entrèves, M. (1988) ‘Aristotle or burke? Some comments on H. Shnaedelbach's What is Neo-Aristotelianism?’ Praxis International 7/4: 238–245.
Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pfeffer, J. (1997) New Directions for Organizational Theory: Problems and Prospects, New York: Oxford University Press.
Prilleltensky, I. and Gonick, L. (1996) ‘Polities change, oppression remains: on the psychology and politics of oppression’, Political Psychology 17 (1): 127–148.
Radner, R. (1992) ‘Hierarchy: the economics of managing’, Journal of Economic Literature 30: 1382–1415.
Ramachandran, V.S. (1998) Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind, New York: Morrow.
Rose, N. (1993) ‘Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism’, Economy and Society 22: 283–299.
Rosenberg, N. (1976) ‘Marx as a student of technology’, Monthly Review 28 (3): 56–77.
Rousseau, J.J. (1968) The Social Contract, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Rousseau, J.J. (1984) Discourse on the Origins of Inequality among Men, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Sandelands, L.E. and Stablein, R.E. (1987) ‘The Concept of Organizational Mind’, in Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Greenwich: JAI Press.
Schank, R.C. and Abelson, R.P. (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures, Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Schneider, S.C. and Angelmar, R. (1993) ‘Cognition in organizational analysis: who's minding the store?’ Organization Studies 14 (3): 347–371.
Schott, R.L. (1991) ‘Administrative and organizational behavior: some insights from cognitive psychology’, Administration and Society 23/1: 54–73.
Scott, C. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance, New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 133.
Scott, J. (2001) Power, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Shusterman, R. (1997) ‘Putnam and Cavell on the ethics of democracy’, Political Theory 25/2: 193–214.
Snodgrass, S.E., Hecht, M.A. and Ploutz-Snyder, R. (1998) ‘Interpersonal sensitivity: expressivity or perceptivity?’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 797–811.
Sperber, D. (1985) On Anthropological Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stein, J. (1997) ‘How institutions learn: a socio-cognitive perspective’, Journal of Economic Issues 31: (3) 729–740.
Thau, M. (2002) Consciousness and Cognition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levacic, R. and Mitchell, J. (1996) Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Turner, M. (2001) Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science, New York: Oxford University Press.
Vetlesen, A.J. (1994) Perception, Empathy, and Judgment: An Inquiry into the Preconditions of Moral Performance, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Walker, G. (1985) ‘Network position and cognition in a computer software firm’, Administrative Science Quarterly 30: 103–130.
Warren, M. (1992) ‘Democratic theory and self-transformation’, American Political Science Review 86 (1): 8–23.
Weick, K. (1969) The Social Psychology of Organizing, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wilson, B.R. (ed.) (1970) Rationality, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wolff, R.P. (1970) In Defence of Anarchism, New York: Harper and Row.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blaug, R. Cognition in a Hierarchy. Contemp Polit Theory 6, 24–44 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300276
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300276