Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T19:04:09.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The integrative memory model is detailed, but skimps on false memories and development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2020

Glen E. Bodner  and
Daniel M. Bernstein Open the ORCID record for Daniel M. Bernstein [Opens in a new window]
Glen E. Bodner
Affiliation:
College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide5001, South Australia, Australiaglen.bodner@flinders.edu.auflinders.edu.au/people/glen.bodner
Daniel M. Bernstein
Affiliation:
Kwantlen Polytechnic University, Surrey, BCV3W 2MB, Canada. dbernste@kpu.cahttp://lifespancognition.org/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The integrative memory model combines five core memory systems with an attributional system. We agree with Bastin et al. that this melding is the most novel aspect of the model. But we await further evidence that the model's substantial complexity informs our understanding of false memories or of the development of recollection and familiarity.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e284
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, D. M. & Loftus, E. F. (2009) How to tell if a particular memory is true or false. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4:370–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brainerd, C. J. & Reyna, V. F. (2005) The science of false memory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F. & Ceci, S. J. (2008) Developmental reversals in false memory: A review of data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 134, 343–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deese, J. (1959) On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58:17–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frenda, S. J., Nichols, R. M. & Loftus, E. F. (2011) Current issues and advances in misinformation research. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20:20–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, D. A. (2010) False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion. Memory & Cognition 38:833–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leboe-McGowan, J. P. (2019) Constructions on an unwelcome exit: Bruce W. A. Whittlesea, 1950–2018. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 73:64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftus, E. F. (2018) Eyewitness science and the legal system. Annual Review of law and Social Science 14:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G. & Burns, H. J. (1978) Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4:19–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L. III & McDermott, K. B. (1995) Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21:803–14.Google Scholar
Scoboria, A., Wade, K. A., Lindsay, D. S., Azad, T., Strange, D., Ost, J. & Hyman, I. E. (2017) A mega-analysis of memory reports from eight peer reviewed false memory implantation studies. Memory 25:146–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1997) Production, evaluation, and preservation of experiences: Constructive processing in remembering and performance tasks. In: The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, vol. 37, ed. Medin, D. L., pp. 211–64. Academic Press.Google Scholar