Abstract
The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics, following the time-symmetric formulation of electrodynamics, uses retarded and advanced solutions of the Schrödinger equation and its complex conjugate to understand quantum phenomena by means of transactions. A transaction occurs between an emitter and a specific absorber when the emitter has received advanced waves from all possible absorbers. Advanced causation always raises the specter of paradoxes, and it must be addressed carefully. In particular, different devices involving contingent absorbers or various types of interaction-free measurements have been proposed as threatening the original version of the transactional interpretation. These proposals will be analyzed by examining in each case the configuration of absorbers and, in the special case of the so-called quantum liar experiment, by carefully following the development of retarded and advanced waves through the Mach-Zehnder interferometer. We will show that there is no need to resort to the hierarchy of transactions that some have proposed, and will argue that the transactional interpretation is consistent with the block-universe picture of time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It is argued in [20] that delayed-choice experiments present a very similar difficulty for standard quantum mechanics as do contingent absorber experiments for TI.
A related setup was proposed by D.J. Miller (private communication).
See [38]. The QLE has also been analyzed within the block-universe picture in [15, 36] which, like the present paper, avoid particle paths. These references, however, do not introduce real offer and confirmation waves, and claim that relations between the experimental equipment are the fundamental ontological constituents.
References
Heisenberg, W.: Physics and Philosophy. The Revolution in Modern Science. HarperCollins, New York (2007)
Jammer, M.: The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn. Tomash/American Institute of Physics, Woodbury (1989)
Audi, M.: The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1973)
De Broglie, L.: La mécanique ondulatoire et la structure atomique de la matière et du rayonnement. J. Phys. Radium 8, 225–241 (1927)
Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’ variables (I and II). Phys. Rev. 85, 166–193 (1952)
Everett, H.: ‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Modern Phys. 29, 454–462 (1957)
Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., Wallace, D. (eds.): Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, and Reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
Cramer, J.G.: Generalized absorber theory and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Phys. Rev. D 22, 362–376 (1980)
Cramer, J.G.: The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Modern Phys. 58, 647–687 (1986)
Cramer, J.G.: An overview of the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics. Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 27, 227–250 (1988)
Maudlin, T.: Quantum Non-locality and Relativity, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford (2002)
Elitzur, A.C., Vaidman, L.: Quantum mechanical interaction-free measurements. Found. Phys. 23, 987–997 (1993)
Elitzur, A.C., Dolev, S., Zeilinger, A.: Time-reversed EPR and the choice of histories in quantum mechanics. In: Antoniou, I., Sadovnichy, V.A., Walther, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the XXII Solvay Conference on Physics, pp. 452–461. World Scientific, Singapore (2003)
Elitzur, A.C., Dolev, S.: Multiple interaction-free measurement as a challenge to the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics. In: Sheehan, D.P. (ed.) Frontiers of Time: Retrocausation—Experiment and Theory. AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 863, pp. 27–43 (2006)
Stuckey, W.M., Silberstein, M., Cifone, M.: Reconciling spacetime and the quantum: relational blockworld and the quantum liar paradox. Found. Phys. 38, 348–383 (2008)
Cramer, J.G.: The quantum handshake: a review of the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics. http://faculty.washington.edu/jcramer/talks.html (2005)
Elitzur, A.C., Dolev, S.: Quantum phenomena within a new theory of time. In: Elitzur, A.C., Dolev, S., Kolenda, N. (eds.) Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics? pp. 325–349. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Elitzur, A.C., Dolev, S.: Undoing quantum measurements: novel twists to the physical account of time. In: Licata, I., Sakaji, A. (eds.) Physics of Emergence and Organization, pp. 61–75. World Scientific, Singapore (2008)
Kastner, R.E.: The quantum liar experiment in Cramer’s transactional interpretation. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. B Stud. Hist. Philos. Modern Phys. 41, 86–92 (2010)
Kastner, R.E.: On delayed choice and contingent absorber experiments. ISRN Math. Phys. 2012, 617291 (2012)
Bacciagaluppi, G., Valentini, A.: Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
Lewis, G.N.: The nature of light. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 12, 22–29 (1926)
Dirac, P.A.M.: Classical theory of radiating electrons. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 167, 148–169 (1938)
Wheeler, J.A., Feynman, R.P.: Interaction with the absorber as the mechanism of radiation. Rev. Modern Phys. 17, 157–181 (1945)
Wheeler, J.A., Feynman, R.P.: Classical electrodynamics in terms of direct interparticle action. Rev. Modern Phys. 21, 425–433 (1949)
Wheeler, J.A.: The ‘past’ and the ‘delayed-choice’ double-slit experiment. In: Marlow, A.R. (ed.) Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, pp. 9–48. Academic Press, New York (1978)
Berkovitz, J.: On causal loops in the quantum realm. In: Placek, T., Butterfield, J. (eds.) Non-locality and Modality, pp. 235–257. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002)
Kastner, R.E.: Cramer’s transactional interpretation and causal loops problems. Synthese 150, 1–14 (2006)
Evans, P.W.: Causal symmetry and the transactional interpretation, arXiv:1011.2287v2 (2012)
Marchildon, L.: Causal loops and collapse in the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics. Phys. Essays 19, 422–429 (2006)
Renninger, M.: On wave-particle duality. Z. Phys. 136, 251–261 (1953). English translation available in arXiv:physics/0504043v1
Cramer, J.G.: A transactional analysis of interaction-free measurements. Found. Phys. Lett. 19, 63–73 (2006)
Hardy, L.: On the existence of empty waves in quantum theory. Phys. Lett. A 167, 11–16 (1992)
Marchildon, L.: Quantum Mechanics: From Basic Principles to Numerical Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2002)
Hanbury Brown, R., Twiss, R.Q.: Interferometry of the intensity fluctuations in light. I. Basic theory: the correlation between photons in coherent beams of radiation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 242, 300–324 (1957)
Silberstein, M., Cifone, M., Stuckey, W.M.: Why quantum mechanics favors adynamical and acausal interpretations such as relational blockworld over backwardly causal and time-symmetric rivals. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. B Stud. Hist. Philos. Modern Phys. 39, 736–751 (2008)
Kastner, R.E.: The possibilist transactional interpretation and relativity. Found. Phys. 42, 1094–1113 (2012)
Compatibilism: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/
Acknowledgements
L.M. is grateful to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boisvert, JS., Marchildon, L. Absorbers in the Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Found Phys 43, 294–309 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-012-9695-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-012-9695-z