Skip to main content
Log in

Degree complexity for a modified pigeonhole principle

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

 We consider a modification of the pigeonhole principle, M P H P, introduced by Goerdt in [7]. M P H P is defined over n pigeons and log n holes, and more than one pigeon can go into a hole (according to some rules). Using a technique of Razborov [9] and simplified by Impagliazzo, Pudlák and Sgall [8], we prove that any Polynomial Calculus refutation of a set of polynomials encoding the M P H P, requires degree Ω(log n). We also prove a simple Lemma giving a simulation of Resolution by Polynomial Calculus. Using this lemma, and a Resolution upper bound by Goerdt [7], we obtain that the degree lower bound is tight.

Our lower bound establishes the optimality of the tree-like Resolution simulation by the Polynomial Calculus given in [6].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 29 March 2001 / Published online: 2 September 2002

RID="⋆"

ID="⋆" A prelimianry version appeared as part of the paper A Study of Proof Search Algorithms for Resolution and Polynomial Calculus published in the Proceedings of the 40-th IEEE Conference on Foundations of Computer Science, 1999

RID="†"

ID="†" Partly supported by Project CICYT, TIC 98-0410-C02-01 and Promoción General del Conocimiento PB98-0937-C04-03.

RID="††"

ID="††" Part of this work was done while the author was a member of the School of Mathematics at Institute for Advanced Study supported by a NSF grant n. 9987845

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonet, M., Galesi, N. Degree complexity for a modified pigeonhole principle. Arch. Math. Logic 42, 403–414 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001530200141

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001530200141

Keywords

Navigation