Abstract
Pragma-dialectics is dynamic, context-sensitive, and multi-agent; it promises theories of fallacy and argumentative structure. But pragma-dialectic theory and practice are not yet fully in harmony. Key definitions of the theory fall short of explicating the analyses that pragma-dialecticians actually do. Many discussions involve more than two participants with different and mutually incompatible standpoints. Success in such a discussion may be more than success against each opponent. Pragma-dialectics does well at analyzing arguments advanced by one party, directed at another party; it does much less well at analyzing arguments directed at several opponents at once or at convincing an audience. I suggest a strategy of construing fallacies as defeasible arguments relying on reasonable default principles but applying them in circumstances in which they are undercut or overridden.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Fischer, D. H.: 1970, Historians' Fallacies, Harper and Row, New York.
Henkemans, A. F. S.: 1994, ‘Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion’, in van F. H. Eemeren and R. Grootendorst (ed.), Studies in Pragma-dialectics, Vale Press, Newport News.
Heyting, A.: 1951, ‘Disputation’, in Intuitionism, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1990, ‘Analyzing Argumentative Discourse’, in R. Trapp and J. Schuetz (eds.), Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in Honor of Wayne Brockriede, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL.
Van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Van Eemeren, F. H., R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs: 1993, Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Ala., and London.
Van Rees, M. A.: 2001, ‘The Diagnostic Power of the Stages of Critical Discussion in the Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussions’, Argumentation 15, 457–470.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonevac, D. Pragma-dialectics and Beyond. Argumentation 17, 451–459 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026311002268
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026311002268