Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Practical wisdom in complex medical practices: a critical proposal

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent times, daily, ordinary medical practices have incontrovertibly been developing under the condition of complexity. Complexity jeopardizes the moral core of practicing medicine: helping people, with their illnesses and suffering, in a medically competent way. Practical wisdom (a modification of the Aristotelian phronèsis) has been proposed as part of the solution to navigate complexity, aiming at the provision of morally good care. Practical wisdom should help practitioners to maneuver in complexity, where the presupposed linear ways of operating prove to be insufficient. However, this solution is unsatisfactory, because the proposed versions of practical wisdom are too individualistic of nature, while physicians are continuously operating in varying teams, and dealing with complicated technologies and pressing structures. A second point of critique is, that these versions are theory based, and thus insufficiently attuned to the actual context of everyday medical practices. Now, our proposal is to use an approach of practical wisdom that enables medical practices to counter the complexity issue and to re-invent the moral core of medical practicing as well. This implies a practice oriented approach, as thematized by practice theory, qualitative empirical research from the inside, and abduction from actual performed practical wisdom towards an apt understanding of phronèsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. A., and R. R. McDaniel Jr. 2000. Managing health care organizations: Where professionalism meets complexity science. Health Care Management Review 25 (1): 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 2009. The Nicomachean ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baart, A., and F. Vosman. 2015a. Zorgpraktijken onderzocht door professionals en onderzoekers. Care practices researched by professionals and researchers. In De patiënt terug van weggeweest, [The patient comeback], eds. A. Baart and F. Vosman, 7–21. Amsterdam: SWP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baart, A., and F. Vosman. 2015b. Een lastige familie die niet lastig is. Verslag van een onderzoek dat te denken geeft. [A difficult family, which is not difficult. Report of an inquiry that makes you think. In De patiënt terug van weggeweest, [The patient comeback], eds. A. Baart and 181–206. Amsterdam: Vosman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, C. M., et al. 2005. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: Implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 294 (6): 716–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J., and J. Plumb. 2015. Exposing hidden aspects of resilience and brittleness in everyday clinical practice using network theories. In Resilient health care. The resilience of everyday clinical work, eds. R. L. Wears, E. Hollnagel and J. Braithwaite, Vol 2, 115–129. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brothers, K. B. 2011. Dependant rational providers. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36: 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, D. F. 1996. Beyond caring. Hospitals, nurses, and the social organization of ethics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. 2013. A crisis of knowledge: Complexity, understanding and the problem of responsible action. In Genomics and democracy; Towards a ‘Lingua Democratica’ for the public debate on genomics, eds. P. Derkx, and H. Kunneman, 36–59. New York: Rodopi B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, M. 2013. A more ambitious agenda for medical education research. Journal of Graduate Medical Education 5 (2): 201–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, S. 2011. Drift into failure. From hunting broken components to understanding complex systems. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, J. 1993. Back to the rough ground: “Phronèsis” and “Technè” in modern philosophy and in Aristotle. Notre Dame: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikeland, O., and D. Nicolini. 2011. Turning practically: Broadening the horizon. Journal of Organizational Change Management 24 (2): 164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism: The third logic. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic injustice. Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Füchtbauer, L. M., B. Norgaard, and C. Backer Mogensen. 2013. Emergency department physicians spend only 25% of their working time on direct patient care. Danish Medical Journal 60 (1): A4558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawande, A. 2010. The checklist manifesto. How to get things right. London: Profile Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafferty, F. W., and D. Levinson. 2008. Moving beyond nostalgia and motives: Towards a complexity science view of medical professionalism. Perspectives Biology Medicine 51 (4): 599–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. E. 2011. The guild of surgeons as a tradition of moral enquiry. The Journal of Medicine Philosophy 36: 114–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heijst Van, A. 2011. Professional loving care. An ethical view of the healthcare sector. Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. 2006. The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford/NewYork: Oxford Univ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuts, F., and A. Mol. 2013. What is a good tomato? A case of valuing in practice. Valuation Studies 1 (2): 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E., R. L. Wears, and J. Braithwaite. 2015. From Safety-I to Safety-II: A white paper. http://www.england.nhs.uk/signuptosafety/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2015/10/safety-1-safety-2-whte-papr.pdf.

  • Judkins, S. 2015. Emergency; Real stories from Australia’s emergency department doctors. Australia: Penguin Groop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldjian, L. 2010. Teaching practical wisdom in medicine through clinical judgement, goals of care and ethical reasoning. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (5): 299–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldjian, L. 2014. Practising medicine and ethics: Integrating wisdom, conscience and goals of care. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. 2012. Phronèsis, experience, and the primacy of praxis. In Professional knowledge; Practical wisdom in the professions, eds. E. A. Kinsella, and A. Pitman, 147–163. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinghorn, W. A. 2010. Medical education as moral formation: an Aristotelian account of medical professionalism. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (1): 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella, E. A., and A. Pitman. 2012a. Engaging phronèsis in professional practice and education. In Phronèsis as professional knowledge; Practical wisdom in the professions, eds. E. A. Kinsella, and A. Pitman, 1–13. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella, E. A., and A. Pitman. 2012b. Phronèsis as professional knowledge: Implications for education and practice.”. In Phronèsis as professional knowledge; Practical wisdom in the professions, eds. E. A. Kinsella, and A. Pitman, 163–173. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klaver, K., E. van Elst, and A. Baart. 2014. Demarcation of the ethics of care as a discipline: Discussion article. Nursing Ethics 21 (7): 755–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotzee, B., A. Paton, and M. Conroy. 2016. Towards an empirically informed account of phronèsis in medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 59 (3): 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. 2015. Phronèsis as an ideal in professional medical ethics: Some preliminary positionings and problematics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36 (5): 299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunneman, H. 2010. Ethical Complexity. In Complexity, difference and identity, eds. P. Cilliers, and R. Preiser, 131–164. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laugier, S. 2015. The ethics of care as a politics of the ordinary. New Literary History. 46 (2): 217–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombarts, M. J. M. H. 2015. Competence-based education misses the essence of the medical profession. Perspectives on Medical Education 4: 326–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1985. After virtue. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesman, J. 2002. Uncertainty in medical innovation: Experienced pioneers in neonatal care. [Ervaren pioniers; Omgaan met twijfel in de intensive care voor pasgeborenen.] Maastricht: Aksant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. 2009. The logic of care; Health and the problem of patient choice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, K. 2006. How doctors think: Clinical Judgement and the practice of medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. 2005. Corporate character: Modern virtue ethics and the virtuous corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (4): 659–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G., and R. Beadle. 2006. In search of organizational virtue in business: Agents, goods, practices, institutions and environments. Organization Studies 27 (3): 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. 2012. Practice theory. Work and organization. An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D., and P. Monteiro. 2017. The practice approach: for a praxeology of organizational and management studies. In The Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies, eds. A. Langley, and H. Tsoukas., London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nortvedt, P., and F. Vosman. 2014. An ethics of care: New perspectives, both theoretically and empirically? Nursing Ethics 21 (7): 753–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olde Rikkert, M. 2017. Complexity-Science verbindt evidence en context based practice. Context en bewijs gaan prima samen. [Complexity-science links evidence and context based practice. Context and evidence can go hand in hand.]. Med Contact 72 (31–32): 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E. D., and D. C. Thomasma. 1993. The virtues in medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, A. 2012. Professionalism and professionalisation: Hostile ground for growing phronèsis? In Phronèsis as professional knowledge; Practical wisdom in the professions, eds. E. A. Kinsella, and A. Pitman, 131–147. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plsek, P. E., and T. Greenhalgh. 2001. Complexity science: The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ 323 (7313): 625–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. 1969. Knowing and being. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M. E., and E.O. Teisberg. 2006. Redefining health care: creating value-based competition on results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., et al. 2013. Generalist solutions to complex problems: Generating practice-based-evidence—the example of managing multi-morbidity. BMC Family Practice 14: 112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, H. 2013. Social acceleration. A new theory of modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. 1996. Social practices. A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. 2012. Soziologie der Praktiken. Konzeptuelle Studien und Empirische Analysen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellman, D. 2012. Reclaiming competence for professional phronesis. In Phronesis as practical knowledge; Practical wisdom in the professions, eds. E. A. Kinsella, and A. Pitman, 115–130. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilney, N. 2011. Invasion of the body; Revolutions in surgery. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, S., and I. Tavory. 2012. Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory 30 (3): 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkens, E. 2008. Mondige burgers, getemde professionals. Marktwerking en professionaliteit in de publieke sector. In [Empowered citizens, tamed professionals. The free market and professionalism in the public sector]. Amsterdam: Uitg. Van Gennep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. C. 1993. Moral boundaries. A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. C. 2013. Caring democracy, markets, equality and justice. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upshur, R. 2014. Do clinical guidelines still make sense? No. The Annals of Family Medicine 12 (3): 202–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, P. P. 2011. De grens van de mens. Over techniek, ethiek, en de menselijke natuur. [Human boundaries. About technology, ethics and human nature.]. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viafora, C. 1999. Toward a methodology for the ethical analysis of clinical practice. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2: 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosman, F., and A. Baart. 2008. Aannemelijke zorg. Over het uitkoken en verdringen van praktische wijsheid in de gezondheidszorg. In [Plausible care. About the vaporisation and suppression of practical wisdom in health care.]. The Hague: Uitgeverij Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosman, F., and A. Baart. 2011. Relationship based care and recognition. Part two: Good care and recognition.”. In Care, compassion and recognition: an ethical discussion, eds. C. Leget, C. Gastmans, and M. Verkerk, 201–229. Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosman, F., and A. Baart. 2015. Zorg uit zorg denken. [Thinking care from care.]. In De patiënt terug van weggeweest. [The patient comeback.] eds, eds. A. Baart, and F. Vosman, 43–57. Amsterdam: SWP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosman, F., and A. Niemeijer. 2017. Rethinking critical reflection on care: Late modern uncertainty and the implications for care ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (4): 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosman, F., J. den Bakker, and D. Weenink. 2016. How to make sense of suffering in complex care practices? In Practice theory and research; Exploring the dynamics of social life, eds. G. Spaargaren, D. Weenink, and M. Lamers, 117–130. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vriens, D., J. Achterbergh, and L. Gulpers. 2016. Virtuous structures. Journal of Business Ethics https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3174-y.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St Jansdal Hospital, Wethouder Jansenlaan 90, 3844 DC, Harderwijk, The Netherlands

    C. M. M. L. Bontemps-Hommen

  2. Optenta Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa

    A. Baart

  3. University of Humanistic Studies, Kromme Nieuwe Gracht 29, 3512 HD, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    F. T. H. Vosman

Authors
  1. C. M. M. L. Bontemps-Hommen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Baart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. T. H. Vosman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. M. L. Bontemps-Hommen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bontemps-Hommen, C.M.M.L., Baart, A. & Vosman, F.T.H. Practical wisdom in complex medical practices: a critical proposal. Med Health Care and Philos 22, 95–105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9846-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9846-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation