Skip to main content
Log in

Illegal products and the question of consumer redress

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the enormous size of the illicit market in the United States, there is a paucity of research concerning the rights of consumers of illegal products. In this article it is argued that the illicit nature of a transaction should not deny consumers the right to safety and redress. Recognition of these rights is not only in line with the public policy goal, i.e., protecting public interests, but it can also serve as a deterrent factor for the sales of illegal products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams v. Waggoner: 1870, Indiana Reports 33, pp. 531–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen v. Gornto, Jr.: 1959, South Eastern Report 2nd Series, 112, pp. 368–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barholt v. Wright: 1887, New Hampshire Reports 45, pp. 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumer Magan: 1988, ‘In Pari Delicto and Contribution’, Houston Law Review 25, pp. 693–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell v. Hansley: 1855, North Carolina Reports 48, p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlen Francis H.: 1924, ‘Consent As Affecting Civil Liability For Breaches of the Peace’, Columbia Law Review 24, pp. 819–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson Kenneth W., et al.: 1986, West's Business Law, 3rd ed., (West Publishing Company, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dole v. Erskine: 1858, New Hampshire Reports 35, pp. 503–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Executive Office of the President, Consumer Advisory Council, First Report, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, October 1963.

  • Furmston M. P.: 1972, ‘The Illegal Contracts Act 1970 — An English View’, New Zealand Universities Law Review 5, pp. 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gains v. Wolcott: 1969, South Eastern Reporter 2nd Series, 167, pp. 366–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary Marc: 1977, ‘Tort Liability of Participants in Consensual Crimes’, The Georgetown Law Journal 65, pp. 1619–1640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotton v. Glidden: 1892, Atlantic Reporter 24, pp. 1008–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper Fowler and Fleming James Jr.: 1956, The Law of Torts 1 (Little, Brown and Company, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart v. Geysel: 1930, Pacific Reporter 294, pp. 570–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman v. Johnson: 1775, English Reports (full print), 98, pp. 1120–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew v. Ollerton: 1693, English Reporter (full print), 90, p. 438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris Clarence: 1931, ‘Punitive Damages in Tort Cases’, Harvard Law Review 44, no. 8, pp. 1173–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 39: 4–50.

  • Prosser Willam L.: 1971, Handbook of the Law of Torts, 4th ed. (West Publishing Co., St. Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards A. J. David: 1981, ‘Drug Use and the Rights of the Person: A Moral Argument for Decriminalization of Certain Forms of Drug Use’, Rutgers Law Review 33, pp. 607–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Winston Hubert: 1942, ‘Antecedent Grounds of Liability in Practice of Surgery’, The Rocky Mountain Law Review 14, no. 4, pp. 233–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout v. Wren: 1821, North Carolina Reports 8, pp. 221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Time: 1988, ‘Flames of Anger’, 13, no. 3 (January 18) p. 28.

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Annual Report of the Attorney General of the United States, 1984–1985.

  • Wigmore John H. 1891, ‘A summary of Quasi-Contracts’, American Law Review 25, pp. 695–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley v. Carpenter: 1891, Atlantic Reporter 23, pp. 630–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodbine George E.: 1925, ‘The Origin of the Action of Trespass’, Yale Law Journal 34, pp. 343–370.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Shaheen Borna is an Associate Professor of Marketing in the College of Business Administration at Ball State University. He has published papers in the Journal of Business Ethics, Public Budgeting and Finance, Journal of Healthcare Marketing, and Journal of Accountancy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borna, S. Illegal products and the question of consumer redress. J Bus Ethics 8, 499–505 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381817

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381817

Keywords

Navigation