Wollstonecraft, Mill, and Women's Human Rights

Front Cover
Yale University Press, Jan 1, 2016 - Literary Criticism - 306 pages
How can women's rights be seen as a universal value rather than a Western value imposed upon the rest of the world? Addressing this question, Eileen Hunt Botting offers the first comparative study of writings by Mary Wollstonecraft and John Stuart Mill. Although Wollstonecraft and Mill were the primary philosophical architects of the view that women's rights are human rights, Botting shows how non-Western thinkers have revised and internationalized their original theories since the nineteenth century. Botting explains why this revised and internationalized theory of women's human rights--grown out of Wollstonecraft and Mill but stripped of their Eurocentric biases--is an important contribution to thinking about human rights in truly universal terms.
 

Contents

Womens Human Rights as Integral to Universal Human Rights
1
A Philosophical Genealogy of Womens Human Rights
26
Foundations of Universal Human Rights Wollstonecrafts Rational Theology and Mills Liberal Utilitarianism
70
Theories of Human Development Wollstonecraft and Mill on Sex Gender and Education
116
The Problem of Cultural Bias Wollstonecraft Mill and Western Narratives of Womens Progress
155
Human Stories Wollstonecraft Mill and the Literature of Human Rights
204
Notes
249
Index
293
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2016)

Eileen Hunt Botting is associate professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame. Her previous books include an edition of Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. She lives in South Bend, IN, and Sherman, ME.