Abstract
Contemporary developments in economicmethodology have produced a vibrant agenda ofcompeting positions. These include, amongothers, constructivism, critical realism andrhetoric, with each contributing to the Realistvs. Pragmatism debate in the philosophies of thesocial sciences. A major development in theneo-pragmatist contribution to economicmethodology has been Quine's pragmatic assaulton the dogmas of empiricism, which are nowclearly acknowledged within contemporaryeconomic methodology. This assault isencapsulated in the celebrated Duhem-Quinethesis, which according to a number ofcontemporary leading philosophers of economics,poses a particularly serious methodologicalproblem for economics. This problem, asreflected in Hausman's analysis, consists ofthe inability of economics to learn fromexperience, thereby subverting the capacity totest economic theories. In this paper wedispute this position. Our argument is basedon a combination of Quine's holism with VanFraassen's constructive empiricism, especiallythe latter's analysis of empirical adequacy andhis pragmatic approach to explanation. Theresulting reorientation of economic methodologyrestores the capacity of economics to learnfrom experience and reinstates the imperativeof developing alternatives to orthodoxtheorizing in economics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Blaug, M.: 1980, The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boitani, A. and A. Salanti: 1994, The Multifarious Role of Theories in Economics: The Case of Different Keynesianisms. In Philip A. Klein (ed.), The Role of Economic Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 121–158.
Boylan, T.A. and P.F. O'Gorman: 1995, Beyond Rhetoric and Realism in Economics. London: Routledge.
Cross, R.: 1982, The Duhem-Quine Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in Macroeconomics. Economic Journal 92: 320–340.
Cross, R.: 1984, Monetarism and Duhem's Thesis. In P. Wiles and G. Routh (eds.), Economics in Disarray. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Fog, B.: 1960, Industrial Pricing Policies: An Analysis of Pricing Policies of Danish Manufacturers. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hahn, F.H.: 1996, Rerum Cognoscere Census. Economics and Philosophy 12: 183–195.
Hausman, D.: 1992, The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hausman, D.: 1997, Why Does Evidence Matter so Little to Economic Theory? In Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara, Kees Doets, Daniele Mundici, Johan Van Bentham (eds.), Structures and Norms of Science, Volume 2 of the 10th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Florence, 1995. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 395–407.
Hausman, D.: 1998, Problems with Realism in Economics. Economics and Philosophy 14: 185–213.
Heijdra, B.J. and A.D. Lowenberg: 1986, Duhem-Quine, Lakatos and Research Programmes in Economics. The Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 1: 175–187.
Hesse, M.: 1970, Quine and a New Empiricism. In G.N.A. Vesey (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 3: Knowledge and Necessity. London: Macmillan, pp. 191–209.
Johnsen, E.: 1968, Studies in Multiobjective Decision Models. Lund: Studenlitteratur.
Kaplan, A.D.H., J.B. Dirlam and R.F. Lanzilloti: 1958, Pricing in Big Business: A Case Approach. Washington D.C.: Brookings.
Klamer, A.: 1988, Economics as Discourse. In N. de Marchi (ed.), The Popperian Legacy in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koopmans, T.: 1957, Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kuenne, R.E.: 1974a, Towards a Usable General Theory of Oligopoly. De Economist 122: 471–502.
Kuenne, R.E.: 1974b, Towards an Operational General Equilibrium Theory with Oligopoly: Some Experimental Results and Conjectures. Kyklos 27: 792–820.
Kuenne, R.E.: 1974c, Interproduct Distances in a Quality-Space: Inexact Measurement in Differentiated Oligopoly Analysis. Applied Economics 6: 255–273.
Kuenne, R.E.: 1986, Rivalrous Consonance: A Theory of General Oligopolistic Equilibrium. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Kuenne, R.E.: 1998, Price and Nonprice Rivalry in Oligopoly. London: Macmillan.
Lawson, T.: 1997, Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.
Mäki, U.: 1996, Two Portraits of Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 3: 1–38.
McCloskey, D.N.: 1985, The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Putnam, H.: 1995, Pragmatism: An Open Question. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Quine, W.V.O.: 1953, From a Logical Point of View. New York: Harper and Rowe.
Quine, W.V.O.: 1960, Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Quine, W.V.O.: 1969, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
Salanti, A.: 1989a, Internal Criticisms in Economic Theory: Are They Really Conclusive? Economic Notes 19: 1–15.
Salanti, A.: 1989b, Distinguishing “Internal” from “External” Criticisms in Economic Methodology. History of Political Economy 21: 635–639.
Sawyer, K.R., C. Beed and H. Sankey: 1997, Underdetermination in Economics: The Duhem-Quine Thesis. Economics and Philosophy 13: 1–23.
Wade Hands, D.: 1979, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9: 293–303.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boylan, T.A., O'Gorman, P.F. Pragmatism in Economic Methodology: The Duhem-Quine Thesis Revisited. Foundations of Science 8, 3–21 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022417025502
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022417025502