Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical study of ethical predispositions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a two-part instrument consisting of eight vignettes and twenty character traits, the study sampled 141 employees of a mid-west financial firm regarding their predispositions to prefer utilitarian or formalist forms of ethical reasoning. In contrast with earlier studies, we found that these respondents did not prefer utilitarian reasoning. Several other hypotheses were tested involving the relationship between (1) people's preferences for certain types of solutions to issues and (2) the forms of reasoning they use to arrive at those solutions; the nature of the relationship between utilitarian and formalist categories; and the possibility of measuring ethical predispositions using different methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boal, K. B. and N. Peery: 1985, ‘The Cognitive Structure of Corporate Social Responsibility’,Journal of Management 11(3), 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommer, M., C. Cratto, J. Gravander and M. Tuttle: 1987, ‘A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making’,Journal of Business Ethics 6(4), 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, F. N.: 1985, ‘A Janus-Headed Model of Ethical Theory: Looking Two Ways at Business/Society Issues’,The Academy of Management Review 10(3), 568–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, G. F., D. J. Moberg and M. Velasquez: 1981, ‘The Ethics of Organizational Politics’,Academy of Management Review 10(4), 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrington, D. J. and J. O. Cherrington: ‘Honesty vs Expediency: The Ethics of Business Leaders’, (unpublished manuscript).

  • Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’,Journal of Marketing 49, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, J.: 1983,Fundamentals of Ethics (Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R.: 1980, ‘A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J. and H. Becker: 1984, ‘Linking Management Behavior to Ethical Philosophy — An Empirical Investigation’,Academy of Management Journal 27, 166–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R.: 1970, ‘A Dimension of Moral Judgment’,Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 35, 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’,Journal of Macromarketing (Spring), 5–16.

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-developmental Approach to Socialization’, in D. A. Goslin, (ed.),Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research (Rand-McNally, Chicago), pp. 347–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. A. and S. A. Morris: 1993, ‘Refining Brady's (1990) Utilitarian/Formalist Aptitude Scale’, presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, March 21, 1993, San Diego, CA.

  • Nozick, R.: 1981,Philosophical Explanations (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastin, M.: 1986,The Hard Problems of Management: Gaining the Ethics Edge (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1979,Revised Manual for the Defining Issues Test: An Objective Test of Moral Judgement Development (Minnesota Moral Research Project, Minneapolis, MN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead, W. E., D. C. Worrell and J. G. Stead: 1990, ‘An Integrative Model for Understanding and Managing Ethical Behavior in Business Organizations’,Journal of Business Ethics 9(3), 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’,Journal of Management Review 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

F. Neil Brady is Professor of Public Management and Associate Director for the Center for the Study of Values in Organizations in the Marriott School of Management at Brigham Young University. He is the author of Ethical Managing: Rules and Resultsand has published numerous articles on business ethics, ethical theory, and moral reasoning.

Gloria E. Wheeler is Associate Professor of Public Management and Associate Director of the Institute of Public Management at Brigham Young University. Her primary areas are research methodology and human resource management. She has extensive survey research experience in many substantive fields and has published articles in journals covering such diverse areas as taxation, teaching, marketing, and human behavior in organizations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brady, F.N., Wheeler, G.E. An empirical study of ethical predispositions. J Bus Ethics 15, 927–940 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705573

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705573

Keywords

Navigation