Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Firms engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) because they consider that some kind of competitive advantage accrues to them. We contend that resource-based perspectives (RBP) are useful to understand why firms engage in CSR activities and disclosure. From a resource-based perspective CSR is seen as providing internal or external benefits, or both. Investments in socially responsible activities may have internal benefits by helping a firm to develop new resources and capabilities which are related namely to know-how and corporate culture. In effect, investing in social responsibility activities and disclosure has important consequences on the creation or depletion of fundamental intangible resources, namely those associated with employees. The external benefits of CSR are related to its effect on corporate reputation. Corporate reputation can be understood as a fundamental intangible resource which can be created or depleted as a consequence of the decisions to engage or not in social responsibility activities and disclosure. Firms with good social responsibility reputation may improve relations with external actors. They may also attract better employees or increase current employees’ motivation, morale, commitment and loyalty to the firm. This article contributes to the understanding of why CSR may be seen as having strategic value for firms and how RBP can be used in such endeavour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albinger H. S., Freeman S. J. (2000). Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations. Journal of Business Ethics 28:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle K. E., Carroll A. B., Hatfield J. D. (1985). An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal 28(2):446–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus K. B., Stone B. A., Heiner K. (2002). Exploring the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness. Business and Society 41(3):292–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballou B., Godwin N. H., Shortridge R. T. (2003). Firm Value and Employee Attitudes on Workplace Quality. Accounting Horizons 17(4):329–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P. (2005). Evolving Sustainability: A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development. Strategic Management Journal 26:197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P., Clelland I. (2004). Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment. Academy of Management Journal 47(1):93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J. B. (2001). Resource-Based Theories of Competitive Advantage: A Ten-Year Perspective on the Resource-Based View. Journal of Management 27:643–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B.: 1999, ‘How a Firm’s Capabilities Affect Boundary Decisions’, Sloan Management Review 40, 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney J., Wright M., Ketchen D. (2001). The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years After 1991. Journal of Management 27(6):625–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya C. B., Sen S. (2004). Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review 47(1):9–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman C., Ambrosini V. (2003). How the Resource-based and the Dynamic Capability Views of the Firm Inform Corporate-level Strategy. British Journal of Management 14:289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer S., Pavelin S. (2004). Building a Good Reputation. European Management Journal 22(6):704–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell D., Craven B., Shrives P. (2003). Voluntary Social Reporting in Three FTSE Sectors: A Comment on Perception and Legitimacy. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 16(4):558–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business and Society 38(3):268–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1991, ‘The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’, Business Horizons July–August, 39–48.

  • Carroll A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review 4(4):497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor K., Prahalad C. K. (1996). A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism. Organization Science 7:477–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse D. L., Carter S. M. (2005). An Examination of Differences Between Organizational Legitimacy and Organizational Reputation. Journal of Management Studies 42(2):329–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick T., Hockerts K. (2002). Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 11:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What are They? Strategic Management Journal 21(10/11):1105–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethiraj S. K., Kale P., Krishnan M. S., Singh J. V. (2005). Where do Capabilities Come From and How do They matter? A Study From the Software Services Industry. Strategic Management Journal 26:25–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC): 2002, Corporate Social Responsibility – A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg).

  • Fombrun C., Shanley M. (1990). What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33:233–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun C., Gardberg N., Barnett M. (2000). Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk. Business and Society Review 105(1):85–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer I., Gerhart B., Scott K. (2003). Are the 100 Best better? An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Being a ‘Great Place to Work’ and Firm Performance. Personnel Psychology 56:965–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath J. (2005). Which Resources Matter the Most to Firm Success? An Exploratory Study of Resource-Based Theory. Technovation 25:979–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein D. (2002). Theoretical Perspectives on Strategic Environmental Management. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12:495–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greening D. W., Turban D. B. (2000). Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business and Society 39(3):254–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart S. (1995). A Natural Resource-based View of Strategy. Academy of Management Review 20:986–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasseldine J., Salama A. I., Toms J. S. (2005). Quantity Versus Quality: The Impact of Environmental Disclosures on the Reputations of UK Plcs. The British Accounting Review 37:231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat C. E., Peteraf M. A. (2003). The Dynamic Resource-based View: Capability Lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal 24:997–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess D., Rogovsky N., Dunfee T. W. (2002). The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review 44(2):110–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman A. J., Keim G. D. (2001). Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal 22:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson G. M. (1998). Evolutionary and Competence-Based Theories of the Firm. Journal of Economic Studies 25:25–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holme, R. and P. Watts: 2000, Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense (World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva).

  • Hoogiemstra R. (2000). Corporate Communication and Impression Management–New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 27(1/2):55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Grenville J. A., Hoffman A. J. (2003). The Importance of Cultural Framing to the Success of Social Initiatives in Business. Academy of Management Executive 17(2):70–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted B. W. (2000). A Contingency Theory of Corporate Social Performance. Business and Society 39(1):24–48

    Google Scholar 

  • King A., Lenox M. J. (2002). Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction. Management Science 48:289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen R. D., McLaughlin C. P. (1996). The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance. Management Science 42(8):1199–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen R. D., Whybark D. C. (1999). The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance. Academy of Management Journal 42:599–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konar S., Cohen M. A. (2001). Does the Market Value Environmental Performance? The Review of Economics and Statistics 83(2):281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantos G. P. (2001). The Boundaries of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing 18(7):595–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makadok R. (2001). Toward a Synthesis of the Resource-based and Dynamic Capability Views of Rent Creation. Strategic Management Journal 22:387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48:268–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews J. A. (2002). A Resource-based View of Schumpeterian Economic Dynamics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12:29–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews J. A. (2003). Competitive Dynamics and Economic Learning: An Extended Resource-Based View. Industrial and Corporate Change 12(1):115–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten D., Crane A., Chapple W. (2003). Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics 45(1):109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A., Siegel D. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification. Strategic Management Journal 21(5):603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A., Siegel D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review 26(1):117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams A., Siegel D., Wright P. M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies 43(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moldaschl M. (2004). Editorial: Near or Far Beyond. Management Revue 15(1):5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldaschl M., Fischer D. (2004). Beyond the Management View: A Resource-Centered Socio-Economic Perspective. Management Revue 15(1):122–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2):242–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer B., Owen D. L. (2005). Assurance Statement Practice in Environmental, Social and Sustainability Reporting: A Critical Evaluation. The British Accounting Review 37:205–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver C. (1997). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review 16(1):145–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M.: 2005, ‘Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Trade-off or Virtuous Circle?’, University of Auckland Business Review 7, 37–43.

  • Orlitzky M., Schmidt F. L., Rynes S. L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24(3):403–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pava M. L., Krausz J. (1995). The Association Between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost. Journal of Business Ethics 15:321–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson D. K. (2004). The Relationship Between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment. Business and Society 43(3):296–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2002, ‘The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy’, Harvard Business Review December, 56–68.

  • Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 1999, ‘Philanthropy’s New Agenda: Creating Value’, Harvard Business Review November-December, 121–130.

  • Porter M. E., Van der Linde C. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4):97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Post F. R. (2003). A Response to The Social Responsibility of Corporate Management: A Classical Critique. Mid-American Journal of Business 18(1):25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Post J. E., Preston L. E., Sachs S. (2002). Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. California Management Review 45(1):6–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray G., Barney J. B., Muhanna W. A. (2004). Capabilities, Business Processes, and Competitive Advantage: Choosing the Dependent Variable in Empirical Tests of the Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal 25:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riordan C. M., Gatewood R. D., Bill J. B. (1997). Corporate Image: Employee Reactions and Implications for Managing Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 16:401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts P. W., Dowling G. R. (2002). Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal 23:1077–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman A. M., Verbeke A. (2002). Edith Penrose’s Contribution to the Resource-Based View of Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 23:769–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo M. V., Fouts P. A. (1997). A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40(3):534–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S., Vredenburg H. (1998). Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and the Development of Competitively Valuable Organizational Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19(8):729–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith N. C. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How? California Management Review 45(4):52–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C.: 1994, ‘The New Corporate Philanthropy’, Harvard Business Review May–June, 105–116.

  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 18:509–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe J., Prakash-Mani K. (2003). Developing Value: The Business Case for Sustainability in Emerging Markets. Greener Management International 44:17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Toms J. S. (2002). Firm Resources, Quality Signals and the Determinants of Corporate Environmental Reputation: Some UK Evidence. British Accounting Review 34:257–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban D. B., Greening D. W. (1997). Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness. Academy of Management Journal 40:658–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman A. E. (1985). Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms. Academy of Management Review 10(3):540–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valor C. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability. Business and Society Review 110(2):191–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Marrewijk M. (2003). Conceptions and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. Journal of Business Ethics 44:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock S. A., Graves S. B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal 18(4):303–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M., Schaltegger S. (2003). How Does Sustainability Performance Relate to Business Competitiveness. Greener Management International 44:5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams R. J., Barret J. D. (2000). Corporate Philanthropy, Criminal Activity, and Firm Reputation: Is There a Link? Journal of Business Ethics 26:341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood D. J., Jones R. E. (1995). Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3(3):229–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright P. M., Dunford B. B., Snell S. A. (2001). Human Resources and the Resource Based View of the Firm. Journal of Management 27:701–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-464, Porto, Portugal

    Manuel Castelo Branco & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues

Authors
  1. Manuel Castelo Branco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lúcia Lima Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Castelo Branco.

Additional information

Manuel Castelo Branco is Invited Lecturer of Accounting at the Faculty of Economics, University of Porto. He is a Ph.D. candidate at the School of Economics and Management, University of Minho. His research has been published in journals such as the Social Responsibility Journal and Corporate Communications: An International Journal.

Lúcia Lima Rodrigues, Ph.D is Associate Professor at the School of Economics and Management, University of Minho. She is the Head of the Department of Management and the Director of the Master in Accounting and Management. She is the Editor of the Portuguese Journal of Accounting and Management, Editor for Europe of the international journal Accounting History. She is referee in several Portuguese and International journals. Her research has been published in several major international journals in Accounting such as The Accounting Historians Journal, Accounting Education: An International Journal, Critical Perspectives on Accounting and Accounting Forum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Branco, M.C., Rodrigues, L.L. Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives. J Bus Ethics 69, 111–132 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation