Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:01:05.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Invariant sequences, explanation, and other stage criteria: reflections and replies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Charles J. Brainerd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Author's Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 1978 , pp. 207 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achenbach, T. M., and Weisz, J. R.A longitudinal study of developmental synchrony between conceptual identity, seriation, and transitivity of color, number, and length. Child Development. 46:840–48. 1975.Google Scholar
Beilin, H., The training and acquisition of logical operations. In: (Rosskopf, M. F., Steffe, L. P., and Taback, S., eds.) Piagetian Cognitive Developmental Research and Mathematics Education. Washington: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1971.Google Scholar
Beth, E. W., and Piaget, J.Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel, 1966.Google Scholar
Brainerd, C. J.Training and transfer of transitivity, conservation, and class inclusion of length. Child Development. 45:324–34. 1974.Google Scholar
Brainerd, C. J.Rejoinder to Bingham-Newman and Hooper. American Educational Research Journal. 12:389–94. 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brainerd, C. J.Cognitive development and concept learning: An interpretative review. Psychological Bulletin. 84:919–39. 1977a.Google Scholar
Brainerd, C. J.Feedback, rule knowledge, and conservation learning. Child Development. 48:404–11. 1977b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brainerd, C. J. Technical appendix to “Invariant Sequences, Explanation, and Other Stage Criteria: Reflections and Replies [BBS 1(2) 1978]”. Research Report No. 448, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario. 1978a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brainerd, C. J. “Stage,” “structure,” and developmental theory. In: Steiner, G. (ed.), The Psychology of the Twentieth Century. Munich: Kindler, 1978b.Google Scholar
Brainerd, C. J. A neo-Piagetian model of children's concept learning, Le Bulletin de Psychologie. 1979. In press.Google Scholar
Brainerd, C. J. and Brainerd, S. H.Order of acquisition of number and quantity conservation. Child Development. 43:1401–06. 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brainerd, C. J., and Hooper, F. H.A methodological analysis of developmental studies of identity conservation and equivalence conservation. Psychological Bulletin. 82:725–37. 1975.Google Scholar
Elkind, D., and Schoenfeld, E.Identity and equivalence conservation at two age levels. Developmental Psychology. 6:529–33. 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greeno, J. G.Identifiability and statistical properties of two-stage learning with no successes in the initial stage. Psychometrika. 33:173–215. 1968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halff, H. M.Parameterization of Markov models for two-stage learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 14:123–29. 1976.Google Scholar
Hooper, F. H., and Toniolo, T. A. A longitudinal analysis of logical reasoning relationships: Conservation and transitive inference. Technical Report No. 380. Research & Developmental Center for Cognitive Learning, University of Wisconsin, 1977.Google Scholar
Kendler, H. H. and Kendler, T. S.Vertical and horizontal processes in problem solving. Psychological Review. 69:1–16. 1962.Google Scholar
Kofsky, E.A scalogram study of classificatory development. Child Development. 37:191–204. 1966.Google Scholar
Kramer, J. A., Hill, K. T., and Cohen, L. B.Infant's development of object permanence: A refined methodology and new evidence for Piaget's hypothesized ordinality. Child Development. 46:149–55. 1975.Google ScholarPubMed
Larsen, G. Y.Methodology in developmental psychology: An examination of research on Piagetian theory. Child Development. 48:1160–66. 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, M.A Cognitive Theory of Learning. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. 1975.Google Scholar
Litrownik, A. J., Franzini, L. R., Livingston, M. K., and Harvey, S. Developmental priority of identity conservation: Acceleration of identity and equivalence in normal and moderately retarded children, Child Development. 1978. In press.Google Scholar
Nagel, E.The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rybash, J. M., Roodin, P. A., and Sullivan, L. F.The effects of a memory aid on three types of conservation judgments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 19:358–70. 1975.Google Scholar
Wohlwill, J. F.A study of the development of the number concept by scalogram analysis. Journal of Genetic Psychology. 97:345–77. 1960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeaman, D. and House, B. J. The role of attention in retardate discrimination learning. In: (Ellis, N. R., ed.) Handbook of Mental Deficiency. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1963.Google Scholar