Il Teeteto e il suo rapporto con il Cratilo

Bibliografia

Ademollo, F. 2011. The Cratylus of Plato. A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511779022Search in Google Scholar

Alline, H. 1915. Histoire du texte de Platon. Paris: Champion.Search in Google Scholar

Aronadio, F. (a cura di) 2008. Dialoghi spuri di Platone. Torino: UTET.Search in Google Scholar

Aubenque, P. 1987. “Syntaxe et sémantique de l’être dans le poème de Parménide.” In Études sur Parménide, Vol. II: Problèmes d’interprétation, sous la direction de P. Aubenque, 102–37. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Barney, R. 2001. Names and Nature in Plato’s Cratylus. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203800645Search in Google Scholar

Baxter, T. M. S. 1992. The Cratylus: Plato’s Critique of Naming. Leiden, New York and Köln: Brill.10.1163/9789004320796Search in Google Scholar

Bluck, R. S. 1961. Plato’s Meno, edited with Introduction and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bluck, R. S. 1975. Plato’s Sophist. A Commentary. Manchester: The University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bostock, D. (ed.) 1991. Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198239307.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Brancacci, A. 1992. “La terza definizione di scienza nel Teeteto.” In AA.VV., Dimostrazione, argomentazione dialettica e argomentazione retorica nel pensiero greco, 107–32. La Spezia: Tipografa Tirrenia.Search in Google Scholar

Brancacci, A. 2001. “Antisthène, la troisième définition de la science et le songe du Théétète.” In Socrate et les Socratiques, textes réunis par J. B. Gourinat, edited by G. Romeyer-Dherbey (dir.), 345–74. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Brancacci, A. 2005. Antisthène. Le discours propre. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Brancacci, A. 2019. “Il Teeteto, l’anima, il pensare.” La Cultura 57: 141–66. https://doi.org/10.1403/93886.Search in Google Scholar

Brisson, L. 1982. Platon. Les mots et les mythes. Paris: Maspero.Search in Google Scholar

Brisson, L. 1989. Platon. Phèdre, suivi de J. Derrida, La pharmacie de Platon. Paris: GF Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar

Brisson, L. 1992. “Diogène Laërce, ‘Vies et doctrines des philosophes illustres’, Livre III: Structure et contenu.” In ANRW II 36.5, 3619–760. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110857023-014Search in Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. 2003. “Metaphysics. §5: ‘First genera’ (The So-Called Stoic Categories).” In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, edited by B. Inwood, 206–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL052177005X.009Search in Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. (ed.) 1990. The Theaetetus of Plato, with a Translation of Plato’s Theaetetus by M. J. Levett, Revised by M. Burnyeat. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Bussanich, J., and N. D. Smith. 2013. The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Calogero, G. 1935. “s.v. ‘Protagora’.” In Enciclopedia Italiana, vol. 35, Roma: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana. coll. 368b–370b, ora in G. Calogero, Il pensiero presocratico. Introduzione e cura diA. Brancacci Milano–Udine: Mimesis, 2020Search in Google Scholar

Calogero, G. 1967. Storia della logica antica, vol. I: L’età arcaica. Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Calogero, G. 2020. Il pensiero presocratico. Introduzione e cura diA. Brancacci. Milano–Udine: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar

Canto-Sperber, M. 1993. Platon. Ménon, Traduction inédite, Introduction. Paris: GF-Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar

Capizzi, A. 1955. Protagora. Le testimonianze e i frammenti, Edizione riveduta e ampliata con uno studio su la vita, le opere, il pensiero e la fortuna. Firenze: Sansoni.Search in Google Scholar

Cavallo, G. 1984. “I rotoli di Ercolano come prodotti scritti. Quattro riflessioni.” Scrittura e Civiltà 8: 5–30.Search in Google Scholar

Centrone, B. (a cura di) 1998. Platone. Fedro, Traduzione di P. Pucci. Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Chappell, T. 2005. Reading Plato’s Theaetetus. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Chroust, A. H. 1965. “The Organisation of the Corpus Platonicum in Antiquity.” Hermes 93: 34–46.Search in Google Scholar

Classen, C. J. 1959. “The Study of Language among Socrates’ Contemporaries.” Proceedings of the African Classical Associations 2: 33–49.Search in Google Scholar

Cordero, N. L. 2004. By Being, it is. The Thesis of Parmenides. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. 1935. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge. The Theaetetus and the Sophist of Plato Translated with a Running Commentary. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Cornford, F. M. 1957. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge. The Theaetetus and the Sophist. Indianapolis and New York: The Liberal Arts Press.Search in Google Scholar

Deman, T. 1942. Le Témoignage d’Aristote sur Socrate. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1972. La pharmacie de Platon. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Di Lanzo, D. 2015. “Il frammento 80 B 1 DK. Sul conoscere.” Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 94: 264–80. https://doi.org/10.1400/272886.Search in Google Scholar

Dixsaut, M. 1994. Le Naturel philosophe. Essai sur les dialogues de Platon. Paris: Les Belles Lettres-Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Dixsaut, M. 2000. Platon et la question de la pensée. Études platoniciennes I. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Dixsaut, M. 2002. “Natura e ruolo dell’anima nella sensazione (Teeteto, 184b–186a).” In Il Teeteto di Platone: struttura e problematiche, a cura di G. Casertano, 39–62. Napoli: Loffredo.Search in Google Scholar

Dixsaut, M. (éd.) 2018. Platon. Le Politique, introduction, traduction (texte grec en vis à vis) et commentaire. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (ed.) 1968. Aristophanes. Clouds, Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/actrade/9780198143956.book.1Search in Google Scholar

Duhot, J.-J. 1991. “Y a-t-il des catégories stoïciennes?” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 45: 220–44.Search in Google Scholar

Erbert, T. 1989. “Wo beginnt der Weg der Doxa.” Phronesis 34: 121–38.10.1163/156852889X00099Search in Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. 2008. “Prädikate oder Ideen: der ontologische Status der koina im Theaitetos.” In Plato’s Theaetetus, Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium Platonicum Pragense, edited by A. Havlicek, F. Karfik, and S. Spinka, 160–79. Praga: Oikoymene.Search in Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (a cura di) 2011. Platone. Teeteto, Introduzione, traduzione e commento. Milano: Rizzoli.Search in Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. 2013. “Aporia e maieutica nel Teeteto di Platone.” In Philosophus orator: Rhetorische Strategien und Strukturen in philosophischer Literatur, hrsg. von I. Männlein-Robert et alii, 63–83. Basel: Schwabe.Search in Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F. 1987. Listening to the Cicadas. A Study of Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511659201Search in Google Scholar

Fine, G. 1979. “Knowledge and Logos in the Theaetetus.” The Philosophical Review 88: 366–97, https://doi.org/10.2307/2184956.10.2307/2184956Search in Google Scholar

Fronterotta, F. (a cura di) 2007. Platone. Sofista, Introduzione, traduzione e note. Milano: Rizzoli.Search in Google Scholar

Gambarara, D. 1989. “L’origine des noms et du langage dans la Grèce ancienne.” In Histoire des idées linguistiques, vol. 1, edited by S. Auroux. Liège and Bruxelles: Mardaga.Search in Google Scholar

Giannantoni, G. 1993. “Socrate nella Metafisica di Aristotele.” Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 85: 566–84.Search in Google Scholar

Giannantoni, G. 2005. Dialogo socratico e nascita della dialettica nella filosofia di Platone, edizione postuma a cura di B. Centrone. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar

Gigon, O. 1959. “Die Sokratesdoxographie bei Aristoteles.” Museum Helveticum 16: 174–212.Search in Google Scholar

Gill, M. L. 2003. “Why Does Theaetetus’ Final Definition of Knowledge Fail?.” In Ideal and Culture of Knowledge in Plato, Akten der 4. Tagung der Karl-und-Gertrud-Abel-Stiftung vom 1.–3. September 2000 in Frankfurt, hrsg. von W. Detel, A. Becker, P. Scholz, 159–73. Stuttgart: Steiner.Search in Google Scholar

Gill, M. L. 2012. Philosophos: Plato’s Missing Dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606184.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, V. 1940. Essai sur le Cratyle. Contribution à l’histoire de la pensée de Platon. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, V. 1979. Le Système stoïcien et l’idée de temps. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Gomperz, H. 1912. Sophistik und Rhetorik. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

Graeser, A. 1978. “The Stoic Categories.” In Les Stoïciens et leur logique, edited by J. Brunschwig, 199–221. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Griswold, C. L. 1986. Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Phaedrus. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. 1971. The Sophists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627385Search in Google Scholar

Hackfort, R. 1957. “Platonic Forms in the Theaetetus.” The Classical Quarterly 51: 53–8.10.1017/S0009838800016591Search in Google Scholar

Heitsch, E. 1988. Überlegungen Platons im Theaetet. Stuttgart: Steiner.Search in Google Scholar

Imbert, C. 1986. “Pour une réinterprétation des catégories stoïciennes.” In AA.VV., Philosophie du langage et grammaire dans l’Antiquité, 263–85. Bruxelles: Ousia.Search in Google Scholar

Ioppolo, A. M. (a cura di) 1999. Platone. Teeteto, Traduzione di M. Valgimigli, Introduzione e Note di A. M. I. Roma and Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1982. “Il pensiero politico greco dalle origini alla Sofistica.” In Storia delle idee politiche economiche e sociali, diretta da L. Firpo, vol. I: L’antichità classica, 167–9. Torino: UTET.Search in Google Scholar

Joël, K. 1921. Geschichte der antiken Philosophie. Tübingen: Mohr.Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. 1973. “Language and Ontology in the Cratylus.” In Exegesis and Argument. Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos, edited by E. N. Lee, A. P. D. Mourelatos, and R. M. Rorty. Assen: van Gorcum.Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. 2007. “Why is the Sophist a Sequel to the Theaetetus?” Phronesis 52: 33–57, https://doi.org/10.1163/156852807x177959.10.1163/156852807X177959Search in Google Scholar

Kerferd, G. 1981. The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, J. 1965. A Commentary on Plato’s Meno. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Konstantakos, I. M. 2004. “Antiphanes’ Agroikos-Plays. An Examination of the Ancient Evidence and Fragments.” Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medioevale 46: 9–40.Search in Google Scholar

Konstantakos, I. M. 2005. “Aspects of the Figure of the ΑΓΡΟΙΚΟΣ in Ancient Comedy.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 148: 1–25.Search in Google Scholar

Lafrance, Y. 1981. La Théorie platonicienne de la doxa. Paris and Montréal: Les Belles Lettres-Bellarmin.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, M.-K. 2005. Epistemology After Protagoras. Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199262225.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Luce, J. V. 1965. “The Theory of Ideas in the Cratylus.” Phronesis 10: 21–36, https://doi.org/10.1163/156852865x00031.10.1163/156852865X00031Search in Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 1994. Prolegomena. Questions to Be Settled before the Study of an Author, or a Text. Leiden, New York and Köln: Brill.10.1163/9789004320833Search in Google Scholar

McDowell, J. 1973. Plato, Theaetetus, Translated with Notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mecci, S. forthcoming. “Il demone di Socrate: l’interpretazione di Terpsione.” Maia 71.Search in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 1999. “The Stoic Theory of Categories.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 215–47.Search in Google Scholar

Nails, D. 2002. The People of Plato. A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics. Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar

Natorp, P. 1921. Platos Ideenlehre. Eine Einführung in den Idealismus. Leipzig: Meiner.Search in Google Scholar

Nicholson, G. 2011. Plato’s Phaedrus. The Philosophy of Love. West Lafayette (Indiana): Purdue University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Philip, J. A. 1970. “The Platonic Corpus.” Phoenix 24: 296–308, https://doi.org/10.2307/1087736.10.2307/1087736Search in Google Scholar

Polansky, R. M. 1992. Philosophy and Knowledge. A Commentary of Plato’s Theaetetus. Lewisburg, London and Toronto: Bucknell University Press-Associated University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reesor, M. E. 1957. “The Stoic Categories.” American Journal of Philology 75: 40–57.10.2307/291991Search in Google Scholar

Ribbeck, O. 1888. “Agroikos. Eine ethologische Studie.” Abhandlungen der phil.-hist. Klasse der Königl. Sächs. Gesell. der Wissenschaften 10: 1–68.Search in Google Scholar

Rispoli, G. M. 2000. “Pseudepigrafi platonici e filologia filosofica.” In La letteratura pseudepigrafa nella cultura greca e romana, Atti di un incontro di studi, Napoli 15–17 gennaio 1998, a cura di G. Cerri, 453–511. Napoli: Università degli Studi di Napoli L’Orientale.Search in Google Scholar

Rist, J. M. 1969. “Categories and Their Use.” In Stoic Philosophy, edited by J. M. Rist, 152–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, poi in A. A. Long, Problems in Stoicism, 38–57. London: Athlone Press, 1971.Search in Google Scholar

Robin, L. 1916. “Sur une hypothèse récente relative à Socrate.” Revue des Études Grecques 29: 129–65, https://doi.org/10.3406/reg.1916.7500.10.3406/reg.1916.7500Search in Google Scholar

Ross, D. 1951. Plato’s Theory of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schofield, M. 1982. “The dénouement of the Cratylus.” In Language and Logos. Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G.E.L. Owen, edited by M. Schofield, and M. Craven Nussbaum, 61–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511550874.005Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 1982. “The Stoic Criterion of Identity.” Phronesis 27: 255–75, https://doi.org/10.1163/156852882x00177.10.1163/156852882X00177Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2003. Plato’s Cratylus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511482649Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 2004. The Midwife of Platonism. Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199267030.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sillitti, G. 1982. Tragelaphos. Storia di una metafora e di un problema. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar

Sillitti, G. 1999. “Parmenide e Platone sull’aporia del nulla.” In Storia Filosofia Letteratura. Studi in onore di Gennaro Sasso, a cura di M. Herling e M. Reale, 45–59. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, N. D. 2017. “Aristotle on Socrates.” In Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue, edited by A. Stavru, and Ch. Moore, 601–22. Leiden and Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004341227_030Search in Google Scholar

Soulez, A. 1986. “Nommer et signifier dans le Cratyle de Platon.” In Sprachphilosophe in Antike und Mittelalter, Bochumer Kolloquium, 2.–4. Juni 1982, hrsg. von B. Mojsisch, 17–34. Amsterdam: Grüner.10.1075/bsp.3.03souSearch in Google Scholar

Szlezák, Th. A. 2004. Das Bild des Dialektikers in Platons späten Dialogen. Platon und die Schriftlichkeit der Philosophie, T. II. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110204803Search in Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. 1993. Thrasyllan Platonism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501737947Search in Google Scholar

Trabattoni, F. (a cura di) 2018. Platone. Teeteto, Traduzione di A. Capra. Torino: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar

Untersteiner, M. 1967. I Sofisti, Seconda edizione riveduta e notevolmente ampliata con un’Appendice su Le origini sociali della Sofistica, 2 voll. Milano: Lampugnani Nigri.Search in Google Scholar

Untersteiner, M. 1980. Problemi di filologia filosofica, a cura di L. Sichirollo e M. Venturi Ferriolo. Milano: Cisalpino-Goliardica.Search in Google Scholar

van Berkel, T. A. 2013. “Made to Measure: Protagoras’ μέτρον.” In Protagoras of Abdera: The Man, His Measure, edited by J. M. van Ophuijsen, M. van Raalte, and P. Stork, 37–67. Leiden and Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004251243_004Search in Google Scholar

van Groningen, B. A. 1963. “ΕΚΔΟΣΙΣ.” Mnemosyne 16: 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1163/156852563x00793.10.1163/156852563X00793Search in Google Scholar

Velardi, R. (a cura di) 2006. Platone. Fedro. Milano: Rizzoli.Search in Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. 1991. Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511518508Search in Google Scholar

Voigtländer, H.-D. 1995. “Sprachphilosophie bei Heraklit.” Hermes 123: 139–55.Search in Google Scholar

Waterfield, R. 2013. “The Quest for the Historical Socrates.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates, edited by J. Bussanich, and N. D. Smith, 1–19. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Search in Google Scholar

White, F. C. 1978. “On Essences in the Cratylus.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 16: 259–74, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1978.tb01343.x.10.1111/j.2041-6962.1978.tb01343.xSearch in Google Scholar

Williams, B. 1994. “Cratylus’ Theory of Names and Its Refutation.” In Language, edited by S. Everson, 28–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511550874.006Search in Google Scholar

Zaborowski, R. 2017. “Revisiting Protagoras’ Fragment DK B 1.” Elenchos 38: 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2017-0002.10.1515/elen-2017-0002Search in Google Scholar

Zeppi, S. 1961. Protagora e la filosofia del suo tempo. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Search in Google Scholar

Zilioli, U. 2007. Protagoras and the Challenge of Relativism. Plato’s Subtlest Enemy. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar