Skip to main content
Log in

Respect for cultural diversity in bioethics. Empirical, conceptual and normative constraints

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In contemporary debates about the nature of bioethics there is a widespread view that bioethical decision making should involve certain knowledge of and respect for cultural diversity of persons to be affected. The aim of this article is to show that this view is untenable and misleading. It is argued that introducing the idea of respect for cultural diversity into bioethics encounters a series of conceptual and empirical constraints. While acknowledging that cultural diversity is something that decision makers in bioethical contexts should try to understand and, when possible, respect, it is argued that this cultural turn ignores the typically normative role of bioethics and thus threatens to undermine its very foundations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appel, J.M. 2005. Defining death: when physicians and families differ. Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 641–642.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, J.H., L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby (eds.). 1992. The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., and P.J. Richerson. 1985. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R. 1967. Ethical relativism. In The encyclopedia of philosophy, vol. 3, ed. Paul Edwards, 75–78. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, H. 1997. Medical bioethics and cultural diversity. Indian Journal of Pediatrics 64: 277–284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. 2003. Bioethics. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, 3rd ed, ed. S.G. Post, 278–287. New York: Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carese, J.A., and J. Sugarman. 2006. The inescapable relevance of bioethics for the practicing clinician. Chest 130: 1864–1872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childress, J.F. 2007. Methods in bioethics. In The Oxford handbook of bioethics, ed. B. Steinbock, 15–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coward, H., and T. Sidhu. 2008. Hindu and Sikh bioethics. In The Cambridge textbook of bioethics, ed. P.A. Singer, and A.M. Viens, 403–407. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Durham, W.H. 1991. Coevolution: Genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. 1993. Life’s dominion: An argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häyry, H. 1998. Should the decisions of ethics committees be based on community values? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1: 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedgecoe, A.M. 2004. Critical bioethics: Beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics 18: 120–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, R., J. McPhee, and I.H. Kerridge. 2002. The challenge of cultural and ethical pluralism to medical practice. Medical Journal of Australia 176: 174–175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, B.A., and P.A. Marshall. 2003. Anthropology and bioethics. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, 3rd ed, ed. S.G. Post, 215–225. New York: Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman, L.M. 1994. Female circumcision/genital mutilation and ethical relativism. Second Opinion 20: 55–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A.L., and C. Kluckhohn. 1952. Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, D. 1988. Moral vision: An introduction to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody-Adams, M. 1997. Fieldwork in familiar places: morality, culture, and philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muramoto, O. 2008. Jehovah’s Witness bioethics. In The Cambridge textbook of bioethics, ed. P.A. Singer, and A.M. Viens, 416–423. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E.D. 2007. Introduction: Culture and bioethics: Where ethics and mores meet. In African American bioethics: Culture, race, and identity, ed. L.J. Prograis Jr., and E.D. Pellegrino, ix–xxi. Washington D.C: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pence, G. 1993. Virtue theory. In A companion to ethics, ed. P. Singer, 249–258. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J. 1991. When philosophers shoot from the hip. Bioethics 5: 67–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J. 2003. The elements of moral philosophy, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. 1993. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P.A., and A.M. Viens (eds.). 2008. The Cambridge textbook of bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.). 2008a. Moral psychology, vol. 1: The evolution of morality: Adaptations and innateness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.). 2008b. Moral psychology, vol. 3: The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, M.Q., and E.N. Anderson. 2010. Introduction to cultural ecology. Lanham: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.J. 1971. A defense of abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1: 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H.C. 2007. Culture and psychology: A history of the study of their relationship. In Handbook of cultural psychology, ed. S. Kitayama, and D. Cohen, 59–76. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylor, E.B. 1871. Primitive culture. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R.M. 1999. The conscience clause: how much individual choice in defining death can our society tolerate? In The definition of death: Contemporary controversies, ed. S.J. Youngner, R.M. Arnold, and R. Schapiro, 137–160. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. 1996. Plan and purpose in nature: The limits of Darwinian evolution. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I am grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on the first version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomislav Bracanovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bracanovic, T. Respect for cultural diversity in bioethics. Empirical, conceptual and normative constraints. Med Health Care and Philos 14, 229–236 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9299-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9299-3

Keywords

Navigation