Skip to main content
Log in

The politics of the human

Anne Phillips,The Politics of the Human. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

  • Critical Exchange
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  • Andrews, K. T., & Biggs, M. (2006) The dynamics of protest diffusion: Movements organizations, social networks, and news media in the 1960 sit-ins. American Sociological Review 71(5): 752–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. (1973) The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jonvanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azar, L. F. (2016) Book review: The politics of the human. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 45(1): 75–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black Lives Matter. (2016) http://blacklivesmatter.com/who-we-are/. (last accessed 23 May 2016).

  • Callahan, J. (2001) Introduction. In: Ellison (2001 [1952]).

  • Cavell, S. (1986) The Uncanniness of the Ordinary. Paper presented at the The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Delivered at Stanford University.

  • Cavell, S. (1990) Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome: The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism. La Salle, Ill.; Chicago: Open Court; University of Chicago Press.

  • Cavell, S. (1999) The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy (With new preface) (ed.). New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Cavell, S. (2002) ‘The Avoidance of Love: A Reading of King Lear’ in Must We Mean What We Say?, (ed.), Stanley Cavell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 267–353.

  • Cavell, S. (2003) Disowning Knowledge in Seven Plays of Shakespeare (Updated ed.). Cambridge, U.K. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Cavell, S. (2004) Cities of Words: Pedagogical Letters on a Register of the Moral Life. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (2005) Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, W. (1981) Civilities and Civil Rights: Greensboro, North Carolina, and the Black Struggle for Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, M. (1999) Normative Theory in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Das, V. (2007) Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deranty, J.-P. (ed.) (2010). Jacques Rancière: Key Concepts. Durham: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, M. (2014) What makes the world dangerous? In J. Edkins & M. Zehfuss (Eds.), Global Politics: A New Introduction (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, R. (2001 [1952]) Invisible Man. London: Penguin.

  • Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (1986 [1952]) Black Skins, White Masks. Transl. C. L. Markmann. London: Pluto.

  • Fricker, M. (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W.B. (1955–1956) ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’. Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society, Vol. 56, pp. 167–198.

  • Getachew, A. (2016) Universalism after the post-colonial turn: Interpreting the Haitian revolution. Political Theory 44(6): 821–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, D. A. (2015) How Did Jamar Clark Die?. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/11/jamar-clark-is-the-next-great-police-brutality-controversy/416418/. (last accessed 23 May 2016).

  • Hallward, P. (2009) Staging equality: Rancière’s theatrocracy and the limits of anarchic equality. In G. Rockhill & P. Watts (Eds.), Jacques Rancière: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, E. (2002) Stanley Cavell: Skepticism, Subjectivity, and the Ordinary. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. Online Etymology Dictionary, http://www.etymonline.com/bio.php. (last accessed 24 April 2017).

  • Kowal, R. (2004) Staging the greensboro sit-ins. TDR/The Drama Review 48(4): 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, T. (2010) Wrong, disagreement, subjectification. In: Deranty (ed.) (2010).

  • Morris, A. (1981) Black Southern student sit-in movement: An analysis of internal organization. American Sociological Review 46(6): 744–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2000) In defence of universal values in nussbaum women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Panagia, D. (2010) ‘Partage du Sensible’: The Distribution of the Sensible. In: Deranty (ed.) (2010).

  • Phillips, A. (2015) The Politics of the Human. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pin-Fat, V. (2010) Universality, Ethics and International Relations: A Grammatical Reading. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pin-Fat, V. (2013) Cosmopolitanism and the end of humanity: A grammatical reading of posthumanism. International Political Sociology, 7(3): 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pin-Fat, V. (2015) ‘Cosmopolitanism without Foundations’ in Politics and Cosmopolitanism in a Global Age (eds.), Sonika Gupta & Sudarsan Padmanabhan. New Delhi and London: Routledge.

  • Pin-Fat, V. (2016) ‘Seeing Humanity Anew: Grammatically Reading Liberal Cosmopolitanism’ in Re-Grounding Cosmopolitanism: Towards a Post-Foundational Cosmopolitanism, (eds.), Tamara Caraus & Elena Paris. Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Polletta, F. (1998) ‘It was like a fever…’: Narrative and identity in social protest. Social Problems 45(2): 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (1991) The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. Transl. with an Introduction by K. Ross. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Rancière, J. (1999) Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2004a) Introducing disagreement. Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities 9(3): 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2004b) Who is the subject of the rights of man? The South Atlantic Quarterly 103(2): 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999) A Theory of Justice, revised edition. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

  • Rawls, J. (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1998) Human rights, rationality, and sentimentality. Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers (Vol. 3, pp. 167–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. P. (1959) Cassell’s Latin-English, English-Latin Dictionary. London: Cassell Publishers Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2016) Ralph Ellison’s ‘Invisible Man’ as a Parable of Our Time. The New Yorker. December 4. http://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/ralph-ellisons-invisible-man-as-a-parable-of-our-time. (last accessed 24 February 2017).

  • SNCC Digital Gateway (n.d.) Sit-Ins Greensboro. https://snccdigital.org/events/sit-ins-greensboro/(last accessed 18 February 2017).

  • Sparks, H. (2016) Quarreling with Rancière: Race, Gender, and the Politics of Democratic Disruption. Philosophy and Rhetoric 49(4): 420–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staples, K. (2012a) Statelessness, sentimentality and human rights. Philosophy & Social Criticism 37(9): 1011–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staples, K. (2012b) Retheorising Statelessness: Towards a background theory of membership in world politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staples, K. (2012c) Statelessness and the politics of misrecognition. Res Publica 18(1): 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storm-Heter, T. (2006) Sartre’s Ethics of Engagement. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanke, J. (2011) Jacques Rancière: An Introduction. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR .(1977) Note on Determination of Refugee Status under International Instruments EC/SCP/5, http://www.unhcr.org/uk/excom/scip/3ae68cc04/note-determination-refugee-status-under-international-instruments.html. (last accessed 24 April 2017).

  • Waldron, J. (2012) The Harm in Hate Speech. London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yancy, G. & Butler, J. (2015, January 12) What’s Wrong with ‘All Lives Matter’? The New York Times. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/01/12/whats-wrong-with-all-lives-matter/?_r=0

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moya Lloyd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brace, L., Lloyd, M., Reid, A. et al. The politics of the human. Contemp Polit Theory 17, 207–240 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0198-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0198-3

Navigation