Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T17:15:29.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The stage question in cognitive-developmental theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Charles J. Brainerd
Charles J. Brainerd
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The term “stage” appears to be used in three general senses in theories of behavioral development: (a) as a metaphor: (b) as a description of behaviors that undergo age change; (c) as an explanation of age-related changes in behavior. Although most existing stage models are purely descriptive, a few of them purport to have explanatory power. One such model, Piaget's stages of cognitive development, is considered in this paper.

To be viewed as potentially explanatory, a stage model must describe some behaviors that undergo age change, posit antecedent variables believed to cause the changes, and provide procedures whereby the behavioral changes and the antecedent variables can be independently measured. Piaget's stages seem to satisfy some but not all of these requirements. Piaget's stages describe many agerelated changes in behavior, and some antecedent variables have been proposed. However, procedures do not exist for measuring the two factors independently. In lieu of such procedures, Piaget has outlined a “program” of five empirical criteria whereby the reality of his stages can ostensibly be verified. Some objections to these criteria are considered.

The five criteria in Piaget's program are invariant sequence, cognitive structure, integration, consolidation, and equilibration. Three of the criteria (invariant sequence, integration, and consolidation) lead to the same sorts of empirical predictions (culturally universal sequences in the acquisition of certain behaviors). Such predictions are subject to the objection that Piagetian invariant sequences are often measurement sequences. A measurement sequence is said to occur when some late-appearing behavior consists of some earlier-appearing behavior plus additional things. The cognitive structure criterion is subject to at least three criticisms: First, it yields, at most, descriptions of behavior; second, these are often nothing more than descriptions of task structure; third, they cannot be regarded as unique to the given stages for which they are posited. The fifth criterion, equilibration, generates some predictions that might be considered as prima facie evidence for the existence of stages. However, these predictions conflict with the current data base on Piaget's stages.

It is concluded that there is no compelling support for Piaget's hypothesis that his cognitive stages do more than describe age-related changes in behavior. Since explanatory statements involving stages appear with some regularity in Piagetian and neo-Piagetian writings, there are grounds for supposing this conclusion to be nontrivial.

Keywords

cognitive developmentcognitive structuredevelopmental stagesinvariant sequencesPiagetian theory
Type
Target Article
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 1978 , pp. 173 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bart, W. M.A generalization of Piaget's logical-mathematical model for the stage of formal operations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1971, 8:539–553.Google Scholar
Beilin, H. Developmental stages and developmental processes. In Green, D. R., Ford, M. P., & Flamer, G. B. (eds.), Measurement and Piaget. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.Google Scholar
Bijou, S. W.Development in the preschool years: A functional analysis. American Psychologist, 1975, 30:829–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijou, S. W. & Baer, D. M.Child Development. Vol. 1. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1963.Google Scholar
Bijou, S. W.Child Development. Vol. 2. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.Google Scholar
Brainerd, C. J.Response criteria in concept development research. Child Development, 1977, 48:360–366. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brainerd, C. J. Cognitive development and concept learning: An interpretative review. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, in press, (b)Google Scholar
Brainerd, C. J.Piaget's Theory of Intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1978.Google Scholar
Brainerd, C. J. Cognitive development and instructional theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
Brainerd, C. J. & Kaszor, P.An analysis of two proposed sources of children's inclusion errors. Developmental Psychology, 1974, 10:633–643.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. On cognitive growth: I. In Bruner, J. S., Olver, R. R., & Greenfield, P. M. (eds.), Studies in Cognitive Growth. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
Budden, F. J.The Fascination of Groups. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Buss, A. R., & Royce, J. R.Ontogenetic changes in cognitive structure from a multivariate perspective. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11:87–101.Google Scholar
Carmichael, L. The onset and early development of behavior. In Mussen, P. H. (ed.), Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
Coghill, G. E.The development of swimming movement in amphibian embryos. Anatomical Record, 1908, 2:148.Google Scholar
Coghill, G. E. The reaction to tactile stimuli and the development of the swimming movement in embryos of Diemyetylus torosus, Escholts. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 1909, 19:83–105.Google Scholar
Coghill, G. E.The correlation of structural development and function in the growth of the vertebrate nervous system. Science, 1912, 37:722–723.Google Scholar
Coghill, G. E.Anatomy and the problem of behavior. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1929.Google Scholar
Cornell, E. H. Learning to find things: A reinterpretation of object permanence studies. In Siegel, L. S. & Brainerd, C. J. (eds.), Alternatives to Piaget: Critical essays on the theory. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H.Children's ability to handle Piaget's propositional logic: A conceptual critique. Review of Educational Research, 1975, 45:1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, E. H.Childhood and Society. New York: Norton, 1950.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H.The Developmental Psychology of Jean Piaget. Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavell, J. H.Stage-related properties of cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 1971, 2:421–453.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H.An analysis of cognitive-developmental sequences. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1972, 86:279–350.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. & Wohlwill, J. F. Formal and functional aspects of cognitive development. In Elkind, D. & Flavell, J. H. (eds.), Studies in Cognitive Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Gesell, A., Thompson, H., & Amatruda, C. S.Infant Behavior: Its Genesis and Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgard, E. R., & Bower, G. H.Theories of learning. 4th Edition. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1975.Google Scholar
Hooper, F. H., & De Frain, J.The Search for a Distinctly Piagetian Contribution to Education. Technical Report, Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, University of Wisconsin, 1974.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. Criteria of the stages of mental development. In Tanner, J. M. & Inhelder, B. (eds.), Discussions on child development. Vol. 1. London: Tavistock, 1956.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J.The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence. New York: Basic Books, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhelder, B.The Early Growth of Logic in the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B., & Sinclair, H. Learning cognitive structures. In Mussen, P. H., Langer, J., & Covington, M. (eds.), Trends and Issues in Developmental Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1969.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B., & Bovet, M.Learning and the Development of Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Kessen, W. “Stage” and “structure” in the study of children. In Kessen, W. & Kuhlman, C. (eds.), Thought in the young child. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1962, 28:2 (Whole No. 83).Google Scholar
Klahr, D., & Wallace, J. G.An information processing analysis of some Piagetian experimental tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 1970, 1:358–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L.The development of children's orientation to the moral order: I. Sequence in the development of moral thought. Vita Humana, 1963, 6:11–33.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. Stage and sequence: The cognitive-development approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. (ed.), Handbook of Socialization. New York: Rand McNally, 1968.Google Scholar
Kraft, R. H., Languis, M. L., Wheatley, G., & Mitchell, O. R. Hypothesis of Ontogenetic Parallelism Between Piagetian Theory and Asymmetrical Hemispheric Brain Functioning Theory. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, 1977.Google Scholar
Kurtines, W., & Greif, E. G.The development of moral thought: Review and evaluation of Kohlberg's approach. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81:453–470.Google Scholar
Lawton, J. T., & Hooper, F. H. Developmental theory in the early childhood classroom: An analysis of Piagetian inspired principles and programs. In Siegel, L. S. & Brainerd, C. J. (eds.), Alternatives to Piaget: Critical Essays on the Theory. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. A variety of intelligent behavior in a General Problem Solver. In Yovits, M. C. & Cameron, S. (eds.), Self-Organizing Systems. London: Pergamon, 1960.Google Scholar
Parsons, C.Inhelder and Piaget's The Growth of Logical Thinking: II. A logician's viewpoint. British Journal of Psychology, 1960, 51:75–84.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.Classes, Relations et Nomhres: Essai sur les “groupements” de la Logistique et la Réversibilité de la Pensée. Paris: Vrin, 1942.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.Traité de Logique. Paris: Colin, 1949.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.The Psychology of Intelligence. New York: International Universities Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books, 1954.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. The general problems of the psychobiological development of the child. In Tanner, J. M. & Inhelder, B. (eds.), Discussions on Child Development. Vol. 4. London: Tavistock, 1960.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.On the Development of Memory and Identity. Worcester, Mass.: Clark University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.The Child's Conception of Time. New York: Basic Books, 1969.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. Piaget's theory. In Mussen, P. H. (ed.), Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1970. (a)Google Scholar
Piaget, J.The Child's Conception of Movement and Speed. New York: Basic-Books, 1970. (b)Google Scholar
Piaget, J.Essai de Logique Operatoire. Paris: Denod, 1972.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B.Le Développement des Quantités chez l'Enfant. Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Delaehaux et Niestlé, 1941.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B.The Child's Conception of Space. London; Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B.The Psychology of the Child. New York: Basic Books, 1969.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B.Mental Imagery in the Child. New York: Basic Books, 1969.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B.Memory and Intelligence. New York: Basic Books, 1971.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Szeminska, A.The Child's Conception of Geometry. New York: Harper, 1960.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Szeminska, A.La Genèse du Nombre chez L'Enfant. Neuchâtel & Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé, 1941.Google Scholar
Pinard, A., & Laurendeau, M. “Stage” in Piaget's cognitive developmental theory: Exegesis of a concept. In Elkind, D. & Flavell, J. H. (eds.), Studies in Cognitive Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Siegler, R. S.Three aspects of cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 1976, 8:481–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegler, R. S. The origins of scientific reasoning. In Siegler, R. S. (Ed.), Children's Thinking: What Develops? Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1978, in press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. An information processing theory of intellectual development. In Kessen, W. & Kuhlman, C. (eds.), Thought in the young child. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1962, 27. No. 2 (Whole No. 83).Google Scholar
Strauss, S.Inducing cognitive development and learning: A review of short-term training experiments. I. The organismic developmental approach. Cognition, 1972, 1:329–357.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. M. Criteria of the stages of mental development. In Tanner, J. M. & Inhelder, B. (eds.), Discussions on child development. Vol. 1. London: Tavistock, 1956.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. M. Physical growth. In Mussen, P. H. (ed.), Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
Wohlwill, J. F.Piaget's theory of the development of intelligence in the concrete operations period. American Journal of Mental Deficiency Monograph Supplement, 1966, 70:57–83.Google Scholar