Abstract
In this paper we survey some main arguments for and against epistemological contextualism. We distinguish and discuss various kinds of contextualism, such as attributer contextualism (the most influential version of which is semantic, conversational, or radical contextualism); indexicalism; proto-contextualism; Wittgensteinian contextualism; subject, inferential, or issue contextualism; epistemic contextualism; and virtue contextualism. Starting with a sketch of Dretske’s Relevant Alternatives Theory and Nozick’s Tracking Account of Knowledge, we reconstruct the history of various forms of contextualism and the ways contextualists try to handle some notorious epistemological quandaries, especially skepticism and the lottery paradox. Then we outline the most important problems that contextualist theories face, and give overviews of their criticisms and defenses as developed in this issue.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. Alston (1993) The Reliability of Sense Perception Cornell University Press Ithaca
D. Annis (1978) ArticleTitle‘A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification’ American Philosophical Quarterly 15 213–219
A. Barke (2002) The Closure of Knowledge in Context Mentis Paderborn
A. Brueckner (1985) ArticleTitle‘Skepticism and Epistemic Closure’ Philosophical Topics 13 89–117
S. Cohen (1986) ArticleTitle‘Knowledge and Context’ The Journal of Philosophy 83 574–583
S. Cohen (1988) ArticleTitle‘How to Be a Fallibilist’ Philosophical Perspectives 2 91–123
S. Cohen (1998) ArticleTitle‘Contextualist Solution to Epistemological Problems: Scepticism, Gettier, and the Lottery’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 289–306
S. Cohen (1999) ArticleTitle‘Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons’ Philosophical Perspectives: Epistemology 13 57–89
Cohen, S.: 2000, ‘Contextualism and Skepticism’, in E. Sosa and H. Villanueva, (eds.), Philosophical Issues 10: Skepticism, 94–107.
DeRose, K.: 1995, ‘Solving the Sceptical Problem’, The Philosophical Review 104, 1–52, quoted from the reprint, in K. DeRose and T. A. Warfield, (eds.), Skepticism – A Contemporary Reader, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 183–219.
K. DeRose (1999) Contextualism: An Explanation and Defense J. Greco E. Sosa (Eds) The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology Basil Blackwell Oxford 187–205
DeRose, K.: 2000, ‘Now You Know It, Now You Don’t’, Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Vol. V, Epistemology, 91–106.
DeRose, K.: forthcoming, ‘Single Scoreboard Semantics’, Philosophical Studies, prepublication 10/10/2003, 1–21.
F. Dretske (1970) ArticleTitle‘Epistemic Operators’ The Journal of Philosophy 67 1007–1023
F. Dretske (1971) ArticleTitle‘Conclusive Reasons’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49 1–22
F. Dretske (1981) ArticleTitle‘The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge’ Philosophical Studies 40 363–378
F. Dretske (2004) The Case Against Closure E. Sosa M. Steup (Eds) Contemporary Debates in Epistemology Basil Blackwell Oxford
J. Feinberg (1970) Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility Princeton University Press Princeton
R. Feldman (1999) ArticleTitle‘Contextualism and Skepticism’ Philosophical Perspectives 13 91–114
A. Goldman (1976) ArticleTitle‘Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge’ The Journal of Philosophy 73 771–791
S.D. Hales (1995) ArticleTitle‘Epistemic Closure Principles’ Southern Journal of Philosophy 33 185–201 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.2041-6962.1995.tb00739.x
M. Heller (1999) ArticleTitle‘Relevant Alternatives and Closure’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 196–208
Kornblith, H.: 2000, ‘The Contextualist Evasion of Epistemology’, in E. Sosa and H.␣Villanueva, (eds.), Philosophical Issues10:Skepticism, 24–32.
D. Lewis (1979) ArticleTitle‘Scorekeeping in a Language Game’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 339–359
D. Lewis (1996) ArticleTitle‘Elusive Knowledge’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 549–567
R. Nozick (1981) Philosophical Explanations Oxford University Press Oxford
D. Pritchard (2002) ArticleTitle‘Two Forms of Epistemological Contextualism’ Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 19–55
St. Schiffer (1996) ArticleTitle‘Contextualist Solutions to Scepticism’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96 317–333
Sosa, E.: 2000, ‘Skepticism and Contextualism’, in E. Sosa and H. Villanueva (eds.), Philosophical Issues10: Skepticism, 1–18.
G. Stine (1976) ArticleTitle‘Scepticism, Relevant Alternatives, and Deductive Closure’ Philosophical Studies 29 249–261
P. Unger (1984) Philosophical Relativity University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis
M. Williams (1996) Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Skepticism Princeton University Press Princeton, New Jersey
M. Williams (2001) Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology Oxford University Press Oxford
L. Wittgenstein (1969) On Certainty Basil Blackwell Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brendel, E., Jäger, C. Contextualist Approaches to Epistemology: Problems and Prospects. Erkenntnis 61, 143–172 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-004-0489-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-004-0489-3