Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

On the (Re)Construction of Corruption in the Media: A Critical Discursive Approach

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although corruption has become a hot topic in organizational research, few studies have examined how it is socially constructed. To partially bridge this gap, the present paper takes a critical discursive perspective on the representation of corruption in the media. The empirical focus is on the media coverage of a corruption scandal that revolved around two instances of formal corruption charges and successive acquittals. Based on the analysis, the paper exemplifies how the media makes sense of and gives sense to controversial activities in response to changing and at times contradictory information. In particular, the paper highlights interplay between four dominant discourses—transgression, political, public scapegoating, and individualistic—that that were mobilized throughout the media coverage. These discourses were intimately linked with wider dynamics between problematizing and restorative media framings and thus provided crucial means of reconstructing and reformulating the (il)legitimacy of the reported activities throughout the scandal. While the findings are context specific, this study suggests that similar interplay and dynamics are important aspects of media sensemaking around controversial activities related to corruption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alvesson, M. and D. Kärreman.: 2000, ‹Varieties of Discourse: On the Study of Organizations through Discourse Analysis, Human Relations 53(9), 1125-1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argandoña, A.: 2005, ‹Corruption and Companies: The Use of Facilitating Payments’, Journal of Business Ethics 60(3), 251-264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E. and V. Anand: 2003, ‹The Normalization of Corruption in Organizations’, in R. M. Kramer and B. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25 (Elsevier, New York), pp. 1–52.

  • Ashforth, B. E, D. A. Gioia, S. L. Robinson, and L. K. Treviño.: 2008, ‹Re-viewing Organizational Corruption’, Academy of Management Review 33(3), 670-684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M.: 1986, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, C. Emerson and M. Holquist (eds.) (University of Texas Press, Austin).

  • Bourdieu, P.: 1998, On Television (The New Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J. and D. Miron.: 2002, ‹Entertainment as Media Effects’, in J. Bryant and D. D. Zillman (eds.) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), pp. 437-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantó-Milà, N. and J. M. Lozano.: 2008, ‹The Spanish Discourse on Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 87, 157-171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C. and J. R. Meindl.: 1991, ‹The Construction of Leadership Images in the Popular Press: The Case of Donald Burr and People Express’, Administrative Science Quarterly 36(4), 521-551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chibnall, S. and P. Saunders.: 1977, ‹Worlds Apart: Notes on the Social Reality of Corruption, British Journal of Sociology 28(2), 138-154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., M. Kornberger and C. Rhodes.: 2007, ‹Business Ethics as Practice’, British Journal of Management 18, 107-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S., T. Newton and M. Reed.: 2007, ‹Special Issue on ‹Responses to Social Constructionism and Critical Realism in Organization Studies’’, Organization Studies 28(1), 122-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. and M. E. Graebner.: 2007, ‹Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges’, Academy of Management Journal 50(1), 25-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, J., D. Neu and A. S. Rahaman.: 2006, ‹The Global Fight against Corruption. A Foucaultian, Virtue-Ethics Framing’, Journal of Business Ethics 65(1), 1-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N.: 1995, Media Discourse (Arnold, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N.: 2003, Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. and G. Kress: 1993, Critical Discourse Analysis. Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R.: 1997, ‹Critical Discourse Analysis’, in T. A. Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Structure and Process: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.: 1972, The Archaeology of Knowledge (Pantheon Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W., D. Croteau, W. Hoynes and T. Sasson.: 1992, ‹Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality’, Annual Review of Sociology 93, 373-393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedde-Dahl, S, A. Hafstad and A. E. Magnusson.: 2008, Korrupsjon i Norge (Corruption in Norway) (Kagge, Oslo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A.: 1992, ‹Pinto Fires and Personal Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities’, Journal of Business Ethics 11(5/6), 379-389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.: 1974, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber, D. A.: 1984, Processing the News: How People Tame the Information (Longman, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.: 2007, ‹The Social Construction of Corruption’, in R. Swedberg and V. Nee (eds.), On Capitalism (Stanford: Stanford University Press), pp. 152-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D and C. Hardy.: 2003, ‹Introduction: Struggles with Organizational Discourse’, Organization Studies 25(1), 5-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D., C. Hardy, C. Oswick and L. Putnam (eds).: 2004, The Handbook of Organizational Discourse (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, D. R. and C. D. Zatzick.: 2007, ‹An Examination of Leader Portrayals in the U.S. Business Press Following the Landmark Scandals of the Early 21st Century’, Journal of Business Ethics, 79(4), 361-377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., I. Palmer and N. Philips.: 2002, ‹Discourse as a strategic resource’, Human Relations 53(9), 1227-1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjellum, T.: 2006, Politisk Korrupsjon som Demokratisk Problem [Political Corruption as Democratic Problem] (Cappelen, Oslo).

  • Hodgkinson, P.: 1997, ‹The Sociology of Corruption–Some themes and Issues, Sociology 31(1), 17-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, M. and A. D. Brown.: 2007, ‹An Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility at Credit Line: A Narrative Approach’, Journal of Business Ethics 80(3), 403-418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, F.: 2004, ‹The Politics of Scandal in Spain: Morality Plays, Social trust, and the Battle for Public Opinion, The American Behavioral Scientist, 47(8), 1099-1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M.: 1996, ‹The Search for Definitions: The Vitality of Politics and the Issues of Corruption’, International Social Science Journal 48(3), pp. 321-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayes, D. C.: 2006, ‹Organizational Corruption as Theodicy’, Journal of Business Ethics 67(1), 51-62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenoy, T., C. Oswick and D. Grant.: 1997, ‹Organizational Discourses: Text and Context’, Organization 4(2), 147-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelan, E. K.: 2008, ‹The Discursive Construction of Gender in Contemporary Management Literature’, Journal of Business Ethics 81(2), 427-445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kippendorff, K.: 2004, Content Analysis: An introduction to its Methodology (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klitgaard, R.: 1988, Controlling corruption (University of California press, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornberger, M. and A. D. Brown.: 2007, ‹‹Ethics’ as a Discursive Resource for Identity Work’, Human Relations 60(3), 497-518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J.: 1980, Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, T. L. S. Roudiez (ed.) (Columbia University Press, New York).

  • Lange, D.: 2008, ‹A Multidimensional Conceptualization of Organizational Corruption Control’, Academy of Management Review 33(3), 710-729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lull, J. and S. Hinerman (eds.): 1997, Media Scandals: Morality and Desire in the Popular Culture Market Place (Polity, Cambridge, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovitz, A. A. and M. Silverstein (eds.): 1988, The Politics of Scandal: Power and Process in Liberal Democracies (Homes & Meier, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. D., J. L. Johnson and J. B. Cullen: 2009, ‹Organizational Change Normative Control Deinstitutionalzation, and Corruption’, Business Ethics Quarterly 19(1), 105-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, T. L.: 2007, ‹Framing and Organizational Misconduct: A Symbolic Interactionist Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 78, 3-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. and M. Huberman.: 1994, Qualitative Data (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, J., N. Vladi and A. J. Mills.: 2006, ‹Making Sense of the Walkerton Crisis’, Culture & Organization, 12(3), 207-220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R. P.: 2003, ‹Corruption Networks and Implications for Ethical Corruption Reform’, Journal of Business Ethics 42(2), 125-149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavarala, V.: 1993, ‹Corruption as a Site for Contested Meaning: Elite Constructions in India’, Qualitative Sociology 16(4), 405-422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philips, N. T. B. Lawrence and C. Hardy.: 2004, ‹Discourse and Institutions’, Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635-652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J., Leana, C. R., Pil, F. K.: 2008; ‹Corrupt Organizations or Organizations of Corrupt Individuals? Two Types of Organizational-Level Corruption’, Academy of Management Review 33(3), 685-709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabl, T. and T. M. Kühlmann.: 2008, ‹Understanding Corruption in Organizations–Development and Empirical Assessment of an Action Model’, Journal of Business Ethics 82(2), 477-495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindova, V. P., T. G Pollock and M. L. A. Hayward.: 2006, ‹Celebrity Firms: The Social Construction of Market Popularity’, Academy of Management Review 31(1), 50-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S.: 1999, Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences and Reform (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G. and G. Palazzo.: 2007, ‹Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen From a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 32(4), 1096-1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steidlmeier, P.: 1999, ‹Gift Giving, Bribery and Corruption: Ethical Management Business Relationships in China’, Journal of Business Ethics 20(2), 121-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiffen, R.: 1999, Scandals, Media, Politics and Corruption in Contemporary Australia, (University of New South Wales Press, Sydney).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H.: 1989, ‹The Validity of Idiographic Research Explanations’, Academy of Management Review 14(4), 551-561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tumber, H. and S. R. Waisbord.: 2004a, ‹Political Scandals and Media Across Democracies, volume I’, The American Behavioral Scientist, 47(8), 1031-1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tumber, H. and S. R. Waisbord.: 2004b, ‹Political Scandals and Media Across Democracies, volume II’, The American Behavioral Scientist, 47(9), 1143-1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E and J. Tienari.: 2002, ‹Justification, Legitimization and Naturalization of Mergers and Acquisitions: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Media Texts’, Organization 9(2), 275-304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E. and J. Tienari.: 2008, ‹A Discursive Perspective on Legitimation Strategies in Multinational Corporations’, Academy of Management Review 33(4), 985-993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T.A.: 1990, News as discourse (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hilldale, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A.: 1997, Discourse as Structure and Process: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach, Vol. I and II (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. E.: 2003, ‹Constructive and Destructive Deviance in Organizations’, Academy of Management Review 28(4), 622-632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. J.: 2003, ‹Ethical Choice in Managerial Work: The Scope for Moral Choices in an Ethically Irrational World’, Human Relations 56(2), 167-185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. W. and M. E. Beare.: 1999, ‹The Business of Bribery: Globalization, Economic Liberalization, and the “Problem” of Corruption’, Crime, Law & Social Change 32, 115-146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. and M. Meyer (eds.): 2001, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland

    Eric Breit

Authors
  1. Eric Breit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Breit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breit, E. On the (Re)Construction of Corruption in the Media: A Critical Discursive Approach. J Bus Ethics 92, 619–635 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0177-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0177-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation