Skip to main content
Log in

Constructive mathematics and unbounded operators — A reply to Hellman

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is argued that Hellman's arguments purporting to demonstrate that constructive mathematics cannot cope with unbounded operators on a Hilbert space are seriously flawed, and that there is no evidence that his thesis is correct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bishop, Errett,Foundations of Constructive Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bridges, Douglas, ‘Towards a Constructive Foundation for Quantum Mechanics’, in F. Richman, ed.,Constructive Mathematics (Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics873), 260–273.

  3. Bridges, Douglas and Richman, Fred,Varieties of Constructive Mathematics, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes97, Cambridge Univ. Press, London, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calude, C.,Theories of Computational Complexity, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cooke, R., Keane, M. and Moran, W., ‘An Elementary Proof of Gleason's Theorem’, inThe Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (R. G. Hughes, ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. da Costa, N. C. A. and Doria, F. A., ‘Undecidability and Incompleteness in Classical Mechanics’,Int. J. Theoret. Physics 30 (1991), 1041–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  7. van Dalen, D.(ed.),Brouwer's Cambridge Lectures on Intuitionism, Cambridge Univ. Press, London, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dummett, M. A. E.,Elements of Intuitionism, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gleason, A. M., ‘Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space’,J. Mathematics and Mechanics 6 (1957), 885–893.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hellman, Geoffrey, ‘Gleason's Theorem is not Constructively Provable’,J. Phil. Logic 22 (1993), 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hellman, Geoffrey, ‘Constructive Mathematics and Quantum Mechanics: Unbounded Operators and the Spectral Theorem’,J. Phil. Logic 22 (1993), 221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ishihara, Hajime, ‘A Note on Constructive Unbounded Operators’, to appear.

  13. Kushner, B. A.,Lectures on Constructive Mathematical Analysis, American Mathematical Society, Providence R.I., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Penrose, R.,The Emperor's New Mind, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pour-El, M. B. and Richards, J. I.,Computability in Analysis and Physics, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richrnan, Fred, ‘The Frog Replies’ and ‘The Last Croak’,Math. Intelligencer 9(3) (1987), 22–24, 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Specker, E., ‘Nicht konstruktiv beweisbare Sätze der Analysis’,J. Symbolic Logic 14 (1949), 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart, Ian, ‘Frog and Mouse Revisited: a Review of ...Constructive Analysis by Errett Bishop and Douglas Bridges (Springer: 1985) andAn Introduction to Non-standard Real Analysis by A. E. Hurd and P. A. Loeb (Academic Press: 1985)’,Math. Intelligencer 8(4) (1986), 78–82.

  19. Stewart, Ian, ‘Is There a Mouse in the House?’ and ‘A Final Squeak’,Math. Intelligencer 9(3) (1987), 24–25, 26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bridges, D.S. Constructive mathematics and unbounded operators — A reply to Hellman. J Philos Logic 24, 549–561 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052602

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052602

Keywords

Navigation