Skip to main content
Log in

Plurals, All, and the Nonuniformity of Collective Predication

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Bach, Emmon: 1981, ‘On Time, Tense, and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics’, in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, David: 1996, ‘An Infinite Number of Monkeys’, in Acta Linguistica Hungarica (Special edition devoted to Proceedings of the 5th Hungarian Symposium on Logic and Language).

  • Beck, Sigrid: 2000, Exceptions in Relational Plurals, Talk presented at SALT 10, Cornell.

  • Brisson, Christine: 1998, Distributivity, Maximality, and Floating Quantifiers, Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, M., M. Kanazawa, Y. Kim, S. Mchombo, and S. Peters: 1998, ‘Reciprocal Expressions and the Concept of Reciprocity’, Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 159–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: 1967, ‘Causal Relations’, Journal of Philosophy 64. Reprinted in Donald Davidson: Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980, pp. 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1987, ‘Collective Predicates, Distributive Predicates, and All’, in F. Marshall (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd ESCOL, Ohio State University, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiengo, Robert and Howard Lasnik: 1973, ‘The Logical Structure of Reciprocal Sentences in English’, Foundations of Language 9, 447–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, Brendan: 1987, ‘The Readings of Plural Noun Phrases in English’, Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 477–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1990, Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane and Sten Vikner: 1993, ‘Obligatory Adjuncts and the Structure of Events’, in E. Reuland and W. Abraham (eds.), Knowledge and Language, Vol. II, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Ken and Samuel Jay Keyser: 1987, ‘Explaining and Constraining the English Middle’, in Carol Tenny (ed.), Studies in Generative Approaches to Aspect, Lexicon Project Working Papers 10, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.

  • Heim, Irene: 1983, ‘On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions’, in Proceedings of WCCFL 2.

  • Heim, Irene, Howard Lasnik, and Robert May: 1991, ‘Reciprocity and Plurality’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 63–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 1981, ‘Reciprocal Interpretation’, Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 1985, ‘On Semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Kyle: 1991, ‘Object Positions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 577–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon, Nirit and Fred Landman: 1993, ‘Any’, Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 353–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward and Leonard Faltz. 1985, Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1994, ‘On External Arguments’, in E. Benedicio and J. Runner (eds.), UMOP Occasional Papers 17-Functional Projections, GLSA, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1992, ‘Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution’, in Ivan Sag and Anna Szabolsci (eds.), Lexical Matters, Stanford University, Palo Alto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroch, Anthony: 1975, The Semantics of Scope of English, Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Fred: 1989, ‘Groups, I’, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 559–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Fred: 1996, ‘Plurality’, in S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Blackwell, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langendoen, D. Terence: 1978, ‘The Logic of Reciprocity’, Linguistic Inquiry 9, 177–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard: 1988, ‘On the Double Object Construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, Peter: 1995, Plurality, Conjunction, and Events, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, Peter: 1998, ‘Generalized Distributivity Operators’, Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, Peter: 1999, ‘Pragmatic Halos’ Language 75, 522–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach’, in Bauerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, DeGruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, William: 1994, Syntactic Projections of the Semantics of Aspect, Doctoral dissertation, Cornell, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittwoch, Anita: 1982, ‘On the Difference between Eating and Eating Something: Activities versus Accomplishments’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittwoch, Anita: 1991, ‘Defence of Vendler's Achievements’, in C. Vetters and W. Vandeweghe (eds.), Perspectives on Aspect and Aktionsart (Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6), Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, pp. 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, Friederike: 1997, Parts and Wholes in Semantics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Terence: 1990, Events in the Semantics of English, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1995, ‘Quantificational Structures and Compositionality’, in Emmon Bach et al. (eds.), Quantification in Natural Language, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara and Mats Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in Bauerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, DeGruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, James: 1991, ‘The Syntax of Event Structure’, Cognition 41, 47–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1980, Set Theory and its Logic, Cambridge. Revised edition, Harvard University Press.

  • Ross, J. R.: 1972, ‘Act’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, Roger: 1992, ‘Together as a Non-Distributivity Marker’, in P. Dekker and M. Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Amsterdam Colloquium, Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation, University of Amsterdam.

  • Schwarzschild, Roger: 1994, ‘Plurals, Presuppositions, and the Sources of Distributivity’, Natural Language Semantics 2, 201–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, Roger: 1996, Pluralities, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scha, Remko: 1981, ‘Distributive, Collective, and Cumulative Quantification’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Truth, Interpretation, and Information (GRASS 2), Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speas, Margaret: 1990, Phrase Structure in Natural Language, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, Robert: 1973, ‘Presuppositions’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taub, Alison: 1989, ‘Collective Predicates, Aktionsarten and All’, in Emmon Bach, Angelika Kratzer, and Barbara Partee (eds.), Papers on Quantification, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel, Kai: 1994, Restrictions on Quantifier Domains, Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerståhl, Dag: 1985, ‘Determiners and Context Sets’, in Johan van Bentham and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1991, ‘Reciprocal Scope’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Y.: 1996, ‘Total and Partial Predicates and the Weak and Strong Interpretations’, Natural Language Semantics 4, 217–236.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brisson, C. Plurals, All, and the Nonuniformity of Collective Predication. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 129–184 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022771705575

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022771705575

Keywords

Navigation