Skip to main content
Log in

An Extended Branching-Time Ockhamist Temporal Logic

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For branching-time temporal logic based on an Ockhamist semantics, we explore a temporal language extended with two additional syntactic tools. For reference to the set of all possible futures at a moment of time we use syntactically designated “restricted variables” called fan-names. For reference to all possible futures alternative to the actual one we use a modification of a difference modality, localized to the set of all possible futures at the actual moment of time.

We construct an axiomatic system for this extended branching-time logic and prove its soundness and completeness with respect to bundle tree semantics. Finally, we show how our axiomatic system can be extended with a variety of important additional operators, such as Since and Until, a global difference operator, operators for undivided and divided histories, reference pointers, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blackburn, P., 1989, “Nominal tense logic,” Dissertation, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.

  • Belnap, N., 1992, “Branching space-time,” Synthese 92, 385–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, R., 1970, “An approach to tense logic,” Theoria 36(3), 282–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J., 1979, “Logic and time,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 44, 556–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J., 1980, “Decidability for branching time,” Studia Logica 39(2/3), 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rijke, M., 1989, “The modal logic of inequality,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 57(2), 566–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Maio, M.C. and Zanardo, A., 1994, “Synchronized histories in Prior-Thomason representation of branching time,” pp. 265–282 in Temporal Logic, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 827, D. Gabbay and H.-J. Ohlbach, eds., Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Maio, M.C. and Zanardo, A., 1996, “Gabbay-rule free axiomatization of T × W validity,” University of Padova, Department of Mathematics, Preprint No. 27, 1996.

  • Emerson, E.A., 1990, “Temporal and modal logic,” pp. 995–1072 in Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. B, J. van Leeuwen, ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D., 1981, “An irreflexivity lemma with applications to axiomatizations of conditions on tense frames,” pp. 67–89 in Aspects of Philosophical Logic, U. Monnich, ed., Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D. and Hodkinson, I., 1990, “An axiomatization of the temporal logic with Since and Until over the real numbers,” Journal of Logic and Computation 1, 229–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargov, G. and Goranko, V., 1993, “Modal logic with names,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 22(6), 607–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goranko, V., 1996, “Hierarchies of modal and temporal logics with reference pointers,” Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goranko, V., 1998, “Axiomatizations with context rules of inference in modal logic,” Studia Logica 61, 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurevich, Y. and Shelah, S., 1985, “The decision problem for branching-time logic,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(3), 668–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passy, S. and Tinchev, T., 1991, “An essay in combinatory dynamic logic,” Information and Computation 93(2), 263–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A., 1956, “Modality and quantification in S5,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 21(1), 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A., 1967, Past, Present, and Future, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, C., 1992, “Modal and temporal logics,” pp. 478–563 in Handbook of Logic in Computer Science, Vol. 2: Computational Structures, S. Abramski, D. Gabbay and T. Maibaum, eds., Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R., 1984, “Combinations of tense and modality,” pp. 135–165 in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. II, D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, eds., Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venema, Y., 1991, “Many-dimensional modal logic,” Dissertation, Department of Mathematics, University of Amsterdam.

  • Venema, Y., 1993, “Derivation rules as anti-axioms in modal logic,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 58(3), 1003–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Kutschera, F., 1997, “T × W completeness,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 26(3), 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanardo, A., 1985, “A finite axiomatization of the set of strongly valid Ockhamist formulas,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 14, 447–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanardo, A., 1991, “A complete deductive system for Since-Until branching-time logic,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 20, 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanardo, A., 1996, “Branching-time logic with quantification over branches: The point of view of modal logic,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 61(1), 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanardo, A., 1998, “Undivided and indistinguishable histories in branching time logics,” Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7, 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanardo, A. and Carmo, J., 1993, “Ockhamist computational logic: Past-sensitive necessitation in CTL*,” Journal of Logic and Computation 3(3), 249–268.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, M., Goranko, V. An Extended Branching-Time Ockhamist Temporal Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8, 143–166 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008398102653

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008398102653

Navigation