Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A History of Animal Welfare Science

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human attitudes to animals have changed as non-humans have become more widely incorporated in the category of moral agents who deserve some respect. Parallels between the functioning of humans and non-humans have been made for thousands of years but the idea that the animals that we keep can suffer has spread recently. An improved understanding of motivation, cognition and the complexity of social behaviour in animals has led in the last 30 years to the rapid development of animal welfare science. Early attempts to define welfare referred to individuals being in harmony with nature but the first usable definition incorporated feelings and health as part of attempts to cope with the environment. Others considered that welfare is only about feelings but it is argued that as feelings are mechanisms that have evolved they are a part of welfare rather than all of it. Most reviews of welfare now start with listing the needs of the animal, including needs to show certain behaviours. This approach has used sophisticated studies of what is important to animals and has replaced the earlier general guidelines described as freedoms. Many measures of welfare are now used and indicate how good or how poor the welfare is. Naturalness is not a part of the definition of welfare but explains why some needs exist. In recent years, welfare has become established as one of various criteria used to decide on whether a system is sustainable because members of the public will not accept systems that cause poor welfare. The study of welfare has become part of the scientific basis upon which important political decisions are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bentham J (1789) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen MB, Moe RO, Spruijt B, Keeling LJ, Winckler C, Forkman B, Dimitrov I, Langbein J, Bakken M, Veissier I, Aubert A (2007) Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol Behav 92:375–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (1981) Biology of behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (1983) The stress concept and ways of assessing the effects of stress in farm animals. Appl Anim Ethol 11:79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (1986) Indicators of poor welfare. Br Vet J 142:524–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (1988) The scientific assessment of animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 20:5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (1991a) Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. J Anim Sci 69:4167–4175

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (1991b) Assessing welfare and suffering. Behav Process 25:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (1998) Welfare, stress and the evolution of feelings. Adv Study Behav 27:371–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2000) Welfare assessment and problem areas during handling and transport. In: Grandin T (ed) Livestock handling and transport, 2nd edn. C.A.B.I, Wallingford, pp 43–61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2001a) The use of the concept animal welfare in European conventions, regulations and directives. Food Chain. SLU Services, Uppsala, pp 148–151

  • Broom DM (2001b) Coping, stress and welfare. In: Broom DM (ed) Coping with challenge: welfare in animals including humans. Dahlem University Press, Berlin, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2002) Does present legislation help animal welfare? Landbauforschung Völkenrode 227:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2003) The evolution of morality and religion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 259

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2006a) Adaptation. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 119:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2006b) Behaviour and welfare in relation to pathology. Appl Anim Behav Sci 97:71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2006c) The evolution of morality. Appl Anim Behav Sci 100:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2007a) Cognitive ability and sentience: which aquatic animals should be protected? Dis Aquatic Org 75:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2007b) Quality of life means welfare: how is it related to other concepts and assessed? Anim Welf 16:45–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2008) Welfare assessment and relevant ethical decisions: key concepts. Ann Rev Biomed Sci 10:T79–T90

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2010a) Animal welfare: an aspect of care, sustainability, and food quality required by the public. J Veterinary Med Education 37:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM (2010b) Cognitive ability and awareness in domestic animals and decisions about obligations to animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci 126:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM, Fraser AF (2007) Domestic animal behaviour and welfare, 4th edn. CABI, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM, Johnson KG (1993) (reprinted with corrections 2000). Stress and animal welfare. Kluwer, Dordrecht

  • Broom DM, Sena H, Moynihan KL (2009) Pigs learn what a mirror image represents and use it to obtain information. Anim Behav 78:1037–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabanac M (1979) Sensory pleasure. Q Rev Biol 54:1–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabanac M (1992) Pleasure: the common currency. J Theor Biol 155:173–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dantzer R, Mormède P (1979) Stress in intensive husbandry. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins MS (1980) Animal suffering: the science of animal welfare. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins MS (1990) From an animal’s point of view: motivation, fitness and animal welfare. Behav Brain Sci 13:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal F (1996) Good natured. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1994) Elbow room: the varieties of free will worth wanting. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan IJH (1993) Welfare is to do with what animals feel. J Agric Environ Ethics 6(Suppl 2):8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan IJH (2006) The changing concept of animal sentience. Appl Anim Behav Sci 100:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan IJH, Petherick JC (1991) The implications of cognitive processes for animal welfare. J Anim Sci 69:5017–5022

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1971) Frustration and aggression in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav 19:500–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1972) Thwarting of feeding behaviour in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav 20:444–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer CM, Lawrence AB (2008) Introduction to animal welfare and the sheep. In: Dwyer CM (ed) The welfare of sheep. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engel JR, Engel JG (1990) Ethics of environment and development: global challenge and international response. Belhaven Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D (1999) Animal ethics and animal welfare science: bridging the two cultures. Appl Anim Behav Sci 65:171–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D (2008) Understanding animal welfare: the science in its cultural context. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D, Weary DM, Pajor EA, Milligan BN (1997) The scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Anim Welf 6:187–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Gert B (1988) Morality: a new justification of the moral rules. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen K, Broom DM (2004) Emotional reactions to learning in cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 85:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison R (1964) Animal machines. Vincent Stuart, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood D (1928) Love for animals and how it developed in Great Britain. In: Preece R, Fraser D (eds) Republished 2002 as Dix Harwood’s love for animals and how it developed in Great Britain. Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RP (2008) Animal and human health and welfare. A comparative philosophical analysis. J Agric Environ Ethics 21:91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmer H (1983) Domestikation: Verarmung der Merkwelt. Vieweg, Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde RA (1970) Animal behaviour: a synthesis of ethology and comparative psychology, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes BO (1982) The historical and ethical background of animal welfare. In: Uglow J (ed) How well do our animals fare? Proc. 15th annual conference of the reading University Agricultural Club, 1981, pp 1–9

  • Hughes BO, Duncan IJH (1988) Behavioural needs: can they be explained in terms of motivational models? Appl Anim Behav Sci 20:352–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen P (1986) Observations on the maternal behaviour of free ranging domestic pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 16:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeling L, Jensen P (2002) Behavioural disturbances, stress and welfare. In: Jensen P (ed) The ethology of domestic animals. CABI, Wallingford, pp 79–98

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick KM, Baldwin BA (1987) Cells in the temporal cortex of sheep can respond preferentially to the sight of faces. Sci NY 236:448–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick KM, Atkins K, Hinton MR, Borad KD, Fabre-Nys C, Keverne B (1995) Facial and vocal discrimination in sheep. Anim Behav 49:1665–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick KM, da Costa AP, Leigh AE, Hinton MR, Peirce JW (2001) Sheep don’t forget a face. Nature 414:165–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkden RD, Edwards JSS, Broom DM (2003) A theoretical comparison of the consumer surplus and the elasticities of demand as measures of motivational strength. Anim Behav 65:157–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason JW (1968) A review of psychoendocrine research on the pituitary adrenal cortical system. Psychosom Med 30:576–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason JW (1971) A re-evaluation of the concept of ‘non-specificity’ in stress theory. J Psychiatr Res 8:323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason GJ, Cooper JJ, Clarebrough C (2001) Frustrations of fur-farmed mink. Nature 410:35–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride G, Parer IP, Foenander F (1969) The social organisation of the feral domestic fowl. Anim Behav Monogr 2:125–181

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland DJ, Sibly RM (1975) The behavioural final common path. Philos Trans R Soc B 270:265–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendl M, Paul ES (2004) Consciousness, emotion and animal welfare: insights from cognitive science. Anim Welf 13:S17–S25

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendl M, Burman HP, Parker RMA, Paul ES (2009) Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Appl Anim Behav Sci 118:161–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller NE (1959) Liberalization of basic S-R concepts: extensions to conflict behaviour, motivation and social learning. In: Koch S (ed) Psychology: a study of a science, vol II. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg GP (1985) Biological response to stress: key to assessment of animal well-being? In: Moberg GP (ed) Animal stress. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD, pp 27–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton DB, Griffiths PHM (1985) Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment. Vet Rec 116:431–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mount LE (1979) Adaptation to thermal environment. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouedraogo AP (1998) Ethical consumers? Social representations of stock farming in France. In: Veissier I, Boissy A (eds) Proc. 32nd Cong. Int. Soc. Appl. Ethol. I.N.R.A, Clermont Ferrand, p 204

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp J (1998) Affective neuroscience. The foundation of human and animal emotion. O.U.P, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp J (2005) Affective consciousness: core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Conscious Cogn 14:30–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul ES, Harding EJ, Mendl M (2005) Measuring emotion processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:469–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price EO (2002) Animal domestication and behaviour. CABI, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Regan T (1990) In: Clarke PAB, Linzey A (eds) Political theory and animal rights. Pluto Press, London, pp 176–186

  • Ridley M (1996) The origins of virtue. Viking, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin BE (1990) The unheeded cry. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin BE (1995) Farm animal welfare: social, bioethical and research issues. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959) The principles of humane animal experimentation technique. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer P (1994) Ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Smulders FJM, Algers B (eds) (2009) Welfare of production animals: assessment and management of risks. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji R (1993) Animal minds and human morals: the origins of the western debate. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe WH (1965) The assessment of pain and distress in animals. Appendix III in report of the technical committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive husbandry conditions, F.W.R. Brambell (chairman). H.M.S.O., London

  • Toates F, Jensen P (1991) Ethological and psychological models of motivation: towards a synthesis. In: Meyer JA, Wilson S (eds) Farm animals to animats. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 194–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss JM (1971) Effects of coping behaviour in different warning signal conditions on stress pathology in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 77:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welfare Quality (2009a) Welfare Quality assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Welfare Quality (2009b) Welfare Quality assessment protocol for pigs. Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Welfare Quality (2009c) Welfare Quality assessment protocol for poultry. Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman PH, Lundberg A, Keeling LJ, Koene P (2003) The effect of an audience on the gakel-call and other frustration behaviours in the laying hen (Gallus gallus domesticus). Anim Welf 12:315–326

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Veterinary Medicine, Centre for Animal Welfare and Anthrozoology, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ES, UK

    Donald M. Broom

Authors
  1. Donald M. Broom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald M. Broom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broom, D.M. A History of Animal Welfare Science. Acta Biotheor 59, 121–137 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-011-9123-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-011-9123-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation