1971 Theories of evolution of the biomelric school. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar

1973 ‘The biometric defense of Darwin’, J. hist. bio. 6, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1975a ‘Biology & philosophy: the methodological foundations of biometry’, J. hist. bio. 8, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1975b ‘Metaphysics & population genetics: Karl Pearson and the background to Fisher's multifactorial theory of inheritance’, Ann. sci. 32, 537–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1976a (with Pearson, E. S.) ‘A note on the background to, and refereeing of, R. A. Fisher's 1918 paper “On the correlation of relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance”’, Notes & rec. Roy. Soc. 31, 151–62.Google Scholar

1976 ‘The biometric-Mendelian debate from Galton to Fisher’, Proc. 9th international biometric conference, vol. 1 (Biometric Socy., Boston, 1976), 357–76.Google Scholar

1977 ‘Allan David Birnbaum, 1923–1976’, J. Roy. Stat. Soc., 140A, 564–5.Google Scholar

1978a Karl Pearson and the Galton tradition: Studies in the rise of quantitative social biology, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar

1978b ‘Karl Pearson & statistics: the social origins of scientific innovation’, Soc. stud, of sci. 8, 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1978c ‘Fisher and the neo-Darwinian synthesis’ in Forbes, E. (Ed.), Human implications of scientific advances. Proceedings of the xvth international congress on the history of science (Edinburgh), 481–94.Google Scholar

1978d ‘A “fashionable fallacy” defended’, New scientist, 78, 223–5.Google Scholar

1979 ‘Charles Spearman and the general factor in intelligence: genesis and interpretation in the light of socio-personal considerations’, J. hist, behavioural sciences 15, 142–57.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1980 ‘The meaning of intelligence’ in Hamilton, D. & Smith, J. V. (Eds.), The meritocratic intellect (Aberdeen), 59–66.Google Scholar

1981a ‘Psychologists & social class’ in Webster, C. (Ed.) Biology, medicine & society 1840–1940 (Cambridge), 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1981b ‘Evolution after Darwin’, Open University Course A381, Science and belief from Darwin to Einstein, Block 6, Unit 13, 31–61.Google Scholar

1981c 4 ‘The Pure Gamete’ [on Mendel & Bateson], script and film/video presentation, B.B.C./Open University Productions. (First shown 1 August 1981).Google Scholar

1981d ‘Potere intellettuale e denaro. Considerazioni Sulle origini della statistica’ in Girelli-Bruni, E. (Ed.), Teoria della decisioni in medicina (Verona, Bertani Editore), 29–41.Google Scholar

1981e ‘La situation intellectuelle au moment des debuts de Fisher en genetique des populations’, Revue de synthese, 102, 231–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1982a Entries for Lysenko, T. D. and Dobzhansky, T. in Williams, T. I. (Ed.) A biographical dictionary of scientists, 3rd ed. (London).Google Scholar

1982b Entries for Genotype/phenotype, statistics, eugenics, IQ, individual differences, mutation, population genetics, Mendelian, hybridization, Hardy/Weinberg, biometrics in Bynum, W. F., Browne, E. J. & Porter, R. (Eds.), Dictionary of the history of science (London), 2nd ed., 1985.Google Scholar

1983a Comments on Patricia Pots, Barker, David and Ray, L. J., Oxford rev. educ. 9, 223–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1983b ‘Fisher's entrance into evolutionary science: the role of eugenics’ Grene, M. (Ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism (Cambridge), 19–29.Google Scholar

1983c ‘The transfer of probabilistic methods into psychology’ in Heidelberger, M., Krüger, L. & Rheinwald, R. (Eds.), Probability since 1800: interdisciplinary studies of scientific development (workshop at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research of the University of Bielefeld, 16–20 September 1982) (Bielefeld), 237–45.Google Scholar