Skip to main content
Log in

Colliding Interests – Age as an Automobile Insurance Rating Variable: Equitable Rate-Making or Unfair Discrimination?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many private business relationships are increasingly characterized by claims that certain actions should not be permitted since particular right claims are involved. Such claims should be taken seriously, but are they always ethically legitimate? This paper analyzes one context, the use of age as a rating variable in the pricing of automobile insurance, where such claims are made. By identifying, evaluating and assessing the relevant basis for the differentiation, actuarial equity, it is concluded that there is an ethical basis for such a practice. The analysis also provides an equivalent means for considering other such analogous claims where actuarial equity is involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Academy of Actuaries: 1980, Risk Classification: Statement of Principles, Washington D.C

  • Braver E. R., Trempel R. E. (2004) Are Older Drivers Actually at Higher Risk of Involvement in Collisions Resulting in Deaths or Non-Fatal Injuries Among their Passengers and Other Road Users? Injury Prevention 10: 27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Institute of Actuaries: 1980, Risk Classification: Statement of Principles, Ottawa

  • Flanagan T. (1985) Insurance, Human Rights, and Equality Rights in Canada: When is Discrimination “Reasonable”? Canadian Journal of Political Science XVIII:4 (December)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudry, M.: 1986, Un abrégé de DRAG, un modéle de la Demande Routière, des Accidents et de leur Gravité, appliqué au Québec de 1956 á 1982 (A␣Summary of DRAG, a model of Road Demand and␣of Accidents and their Seriousness, Applied to Quebec from 1956 to 1982), Montréal, Centre de recherche sur les transports

  • Insurance Bureau of Canada: 2003, Underwriting and Rate Regulation. Toronto, ON

  • Insurance Institute for Highway Safety: 2001, ‘Special Report: Older Drivers’, Status Report 36(8). Arlington, VA

  • Insurance Institute for Highway Safety: 2003, ‘Who Poses the Greater Risk: Older or Younger Drivers’? Status Report 38(3). Arlington, VA

  • Laing, S. J.: 2003, A Study of Age Differences in Accident Rates at Intersections in British Columbia (Master’s Thesis, Department of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC)

  • Long J. D. (1971) Ethics, Morality and Insurance. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman S., Ferguson S. A., Braver E. R., Williams A. F. (2002) Older Driver Involvements in Police Reported Crashes and Fatal Crashes: Trends and Projections. Injury Prevention 8: 116–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack E. (2001) In Defense of the Jurisdiction View of Rights. Journal of Ethics 4: 71–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew D. R., Simpson H. M. (1990) New to the Road: Young Drivers and Novice Drivers: Similar Problems and Solutions? Traffic Injury Research Foundation of Canada, Ottawa, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew D. R., Simpson H. M., Pak A. (2003) Changes in Collision Rates Among Novice Drivers During the First Months of Driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention 35: 683–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins M. (2003a) Cost of Public Auto Insurance According to New Study. The Fraser Institute, Vancouver, BC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins M. (2003b) Two Hundred Bucks More: The Premium Cost of Public Auto Insurance. The Fraser Institute, Vancouver, BC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins M. (2003c) Public Auto Insurance: A Mortality Warning for Motorists. The Fraser Institute, Vancouver, BC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins M. (2004) Public Auto Insurance Provinces Rank as Lemons. The Fraser Institute, Vancouver, BC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, J.: 1995, Discrimination. Entry in the CD version of the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy

  • Nolan, J. and J. M. Nolan-Haley (eds.): 1990, Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th edn. (West Publishing Co, St. Paul)

  • Nozick R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea S. A. Jr., Trebilcock M. J. (1982) Rate Determination in the Automobile Insurance Industry in Ontario: The Use of Age, Sex and Marital Status as Rating Variables. The Insurance Bureau of Canada, Toronto, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler S. (1992) Human Morality. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, M. and D. Grierson: 2004, ‘Mandatory Retirement and Older Worker Employment’, Canadian Journal of Economics 37(3), 528–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson H. M., Mayhew D. R. (1992) Reducing the Risks for New Drivers: A Graduated Licensing System for British Columbia. Ministry of the Attorney General, Victoria, BC

    Google Scholar 

  • Towers Perrin (2001) Summary of Relativities for Irish Private Motor. Irish Insurance Federation, Dublin, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • Traffic Injury and Research Foundation: 1997, Reducing the Risk of New Drivers Through Legislation and Regulation. Ottawa, ON

  • Traffic Injury and Research Foundation: 1999, Youth and Road Crashes: Solutions for Tomorrow. Ottawa, ON

  • Traffic Injury and Research Foundation: 2000, Why 16? Ottawa, ON

  • Traffic Injury and Research Foundation: 2002, The Safety Value of Driver Education and Training. Ottawa, ON

  • Traffic Injury and Research Foundation: 2003, The Evolution and Effectiveness of Graduated Licensing. Ottawa, ON

  • Wiegers W. (1989) The Use of Age, Sex, and Marital Status as Rating Variables in Automobile Insurance. University of Toronto Law Review 39(2): 149–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the generous support of the Law Commission of Canada and the Insurance Bureau of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sally Gunz.

Additional information

Robert L. Brown is a Professor of Actuarial Science, Director of the Institute of Insurance and Pension Research at the University of Waterloo, Fellow and former President of the Canadian Institute of Actuaries, Fellow and past President of the Society of Actuaries. His research focus is the evolution of financial security programs in times of rapidly shifting demographics.

Darren Charters is an Assistant Professor in business law in the School of Accountancy, University of Waterloo. He is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada and holds degrees in arts, law, and business. He has published in the areas of business ethics, competitive intelligence, privacy and employment law.

Sally Gunz is a professor in business law at the School of Accountancy, University of Waterloo, Canada. She is the Director of the Centre for Accounting Ethics, University of Waterloo and is a former president of the Academy of Legal Studies in Business. Her current research interests focus on the ethical decision making of professionals.

Neil Haddow is currently finishing his Ph.D in philosophy at the University of Waterloo. His Ph.D research focuses on reconciling value pluralism with rights theory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, R.L., Charters, D., Gunz, S. et al. Colliding Interests – Age as an Automobile Insurance Rating Variable: Equitable Rate-Making or Unfair Discrimination?. J Bus Ethics 72, 103–114 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9160-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9160-z

Keywords

Navigation