Abstract
Though clearly fallacious, the inference from determinism to fatalism (the ``Lazy Argument'') has appealed to such minds as Aristotle and his disciple, Alexander of Aphrodisias. It is argued here (1) that determinism does entail a rather similar position, dubbed ``futilism''; and (2) that distinctively Aristotelian determinism entails fatalism for any event to which it applies. The concept of ``fate'' is examined along the way.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Broadie, S. From Necessity to Fate: a Fallacy. The Journal of Ethics 5, 21–37 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011466914535
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011466914535