Skip to main content
Log in

From Necessity to Fate: a Fallacy

  • Published:
The Journal of Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Though clearly fallacious, the inference from determinism to fatalism (the ``Lazy Argument'') has appealed to such minds as Aristotle and his disciple, Alexander of Aphrodisias. It is argued here (1) that determinism does entail a rather similar position, dubbed ``futilism''; and (2) that distinctively Aristotelian determinism entails fatalism for any event to which it applies. The concept of ``fate'' is examined along the way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broadie, S. From Necessity to Fate: a Fallacy. The Journal of Ethics 5, 21–37 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011466914535

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011466914535

Navigation