Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T09:32:24.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Latin Literature - Ettore Paratore: Storia della Letteratura Latina. Pp. 991; 9 plates. Florence: Sansoni, 1950. Paper, L. 1400.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2009

Robert Browning
Affiliation:
University College, London

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 172 note 1 Cf. particularly the famous choral ode, II. 332–75:

page 172 note 2 Cf. particularly Theseus' speech, II. 196– 218:

page 173 note 1 The distinction is perhaps most clearly and succinctly stated in G. J. Theocharides, Beiträge zur Geschichte des byzantinischen Pro-fantheaters im IV. und V. Jahrhunderts (αOϒραφίας IIαράρτημα 3), Salonica, 1940, p. 10.

page 173 note 2 What he says is: ‘hinc (from the general belief in the efficacy of dirae deprecationes) Theocriti apud Graecos, Catulli apud nos proximeque Vergilii incantamentorum amatoria imitatio’ (N.H. xxviii. 19).

page 173 note 3 He was a Roman from Pannonia, the son of one Tatulus. Cf. Seeck, O., Geschichte des Untergangs der antiken Welt, vi. 377Google Scholar; E. Stein, Geschichte des spätrömischen Reiches, 585–6, and sources there quoted.

page 173 note 4 The main vehicle through which the Romance became known in the West was the version made by the Archipresbyter Leo of Naples about 960 from a manuscript brought from Constantinople.