Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T01:35:07.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Applying Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Extract

Applied ethics work seems to me to be of three main kinds. There is participatory work, where a person whose specialism is ethics participates in a process leading to ethical judgments or decisions. And there are two kinds of teaching work where the teaching objective is to make learners better placed to participate in such processes; one kind of teaching work relates to matters which are specific to the future occupation of the learner, the other kind relates to matters which are not specific to it.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Caplan, (1982/1983) 314Google Scholar; MacIntyre, (1984) 498–9.Google Scholar

2 Cf. O'Neill, (1984).Google Scholar

3 O'Neill, (1984).Google Scholar

4 Cf. O'Neill, (1986) 25–6.Google Scholar

5 Caplan, (1982/1983) 318Google Scholar; see also Maxwell, (1980).Google Scholar

6 Cf. Thompson, et al. (1983) 1620.Google Scholar

7 Baier, (1985a) 240.Google Scholar

8 Williams, (1985) 117.Google Scholar

9 Feyerabend, (1968) 1415.Google Scholar

10 Baier, (1985b).Google Scholar

11 For a good example, see the paper by Barrie Paskins in this volume (pp. 95–116).

12 Maxwell, (1984)Google Scholar has argued that the exclusion of value-articulation and value-scrutiny from natural science has cost science dearly in rigour and self-understanding.

13 The present paper restores some material (mainly in section III) omitted from the version read at the Belfast conference, and also makes some minor changes from that version, some in response to comments by the conference participants and subsequently by my colleague Terence McKnight and, more recently, by the editor of the present volume, for which I am very grateful.