Semantic priming: On the role of awareness in visual word recognition in the absence of an expectancy
Section snippets
Overview
It is well documented that semantic context and stimulus quality jointly affect the time to identify visually presented target words; the semantic context effect is larger when targets are degraded than when they are clear (e.g., Becker & Killion, 1977; Besner & Smith, 1992; Borowsky and Besner, 1991, Borowsky and Besner, 1993; Meyer, Schvaneveldt, & Ruddy, 1975). Moreover, this interaction is modulated by relatedness proportion (i.e., the proportion of word targets preceded by a related prime
Participants
Thirty-two University of Waterloo undergraduate students participated in a half-hour session. All participants spoke English as a first language and were assumed to have normal or corrected-to-normal vision. Each subject was paid six dollars.
Design
A 2 (semantic context: related vs unrelated) × 2 (stimulus quality: clear vs. degraded) repeated measures design was used. Both factors were within-subjects and trials from these conditions were randomly presented with the constraint that each of the four
Participants
Seventy-two University of Waterloo undergraduate students participated in a half-hour session. All participants spoke English as a first language and were assumed to have normal or corrected-to-normal vision. Each subject was paid six dollars.
Design
Experiment 2 was identical to Experiment 1 except that the prime exposure duration was decreased from 150 to 34 ms. The backward mask appeared as soon as the prime display terminated. To hold prime–target SOA (i.e., 784 ms) constant, the duration of the
Experiment 3
The intent of Experiment 3 is to provide evidence against the possibility that the absence of a semantic context by stimulus quality interaction in Experiment 2 is due simply to masking per se. Experiment 3 employs the same masking parameters but uses repetition context instead of semantic context. According to Besner and colleagues’ two-stage account (see Besner & Swan, 1982) repetition context and stimulus quality exert their effects at the same stage of processing as the effect of stimulus
General discussion
The pattern of results observed across Experiments 1 and 2 is strikingly clear. In Experiment 1 semantic context and stimulus quality interact, whereas in Experiment 2 they are additive factors. The only difference between. Experiments 1 and 2 is the prime duration. In Experiment 1 the prime was presented for 150 ms before being masked, whereas in Experiment 2 the prime was presented for 34 ms before being masked. It is argued that subjects were aware of the prime in Experiment 1, but not in
Conclusion
Our starting point was the observation that, despite the widely accepted view that visual word recognition can occur without awareness, there has been little to no research that discusses how awareness affects the processing dynamics in the visual word recognition system. The present research explores one well-known finding in the word recognition literature, namely the semantic context by stimulus quality interaction, and frames it in terms of Besner and colleagues’ two-stage model. In terms
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Grant A0998 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to DB.
References (43)
Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory encoding
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour
(1983)On the nature of the proportion effect in semantic priming
Acta Psychologica
(1985)A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory
Journal of Memory and Language
(1991)Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition
Cognitive Psychology
(1983)- et al.
Measuring the relative magnitude of unconscious influences
Consciousness and Cognition
(1995) - et al.
Perception without awareness: Perspectives from cognitive psychology
Cognition
(2001) A functional model for memory
- et al.
Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective/retrospective processing theory
Language, memory, and thought
(1976)The architecture of cognition
(1983)
Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies
Memory & Cognition
What do we really know about context effects?
Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Models of lexical access in visual word recognition
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology A
Visual word recognition across orthographies: On the interaction between context and degradation
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Word recognition and consciousness
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Unconscious perception: Attention, awareness, and control
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime–target pairs and the stimulus onset asynchrony of prime and target
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A
Cited by (24)
Is that what I wanted to do? Cued vocalizations influence the phenomenology of controlling a moving object
2012, Consciousness and CognitionCitation Excerpt :Auditory cues can also help orient attention to visual cues (Mazza, Turatto, Rossi, & Umiltà, 2007; Stein, Meredith, Huneycutt, & McDade, 1989), and the perception of causal relationships between two events tends to be strengthened by convergent visual and auditory evidence (Guski & Troje, 2003). Auditory semantic priming also influences the fluency of visual identifications, as demonstrated by semantic priming effects in letter search (Brown & Besner, 2002) and visual word recognition (Slowiaczek, 1994; Swinney, Onifer, Prather, & Hirshkowitz, 1979). However, it is also true that when conflicts arise among sensory cues, they are usually resolved in favor of the more precise and reliable sensory modality, which is task dependent (Ernst & Bülthoff, 2004).
Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming
2008, Journal of Memory and LanguageEffects of nonlinguistic auditory variations on lexical processing in Broca's aphasics
2006, Brain and LanguageInteractions of stimulus quality and semantic context on N400 in visual word recognition
2022, Applied PsycholinguisticsVisual word recognition: Evidence for global and local control over semantic feedback
2010, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and PerformanceMechanisms of Masked Priming: A Meta-Analysis
2009, Psychological Bulletin